Parker Scott L, Amin Anubhav G, Santiago-Dieppa David, Liauw Jason A, Bydon Ali, Sciubba Daniel M, Wolinsky Jean-Paul, Gokaslan Ziya L, Witham Timothy F
*Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; and †Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15;39(8):683-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000221.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the incidence and clinical significance of vascular encroachment resulting from freehand placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screws are routinely used to effectively stabilize all 3 columns of the spine but can be technically demanding to place in the setting of variable anatomy. There is a paucity of data regarding iatrogenic major vascular injuries during posterior instrumentation procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients undergoing freehand pedicle screw placement without image guidance in the thoracic or lumbar spine during a 7-year period. The incidence and extent of vascular encroachment by a pedicle screw was determined by review of routine postoperative computed tomographic scans obtained within 24 hours of all surgical procedures. Vascular encroachment was defined as a pedicle screw that was touching or deforming the wall of a major vessel. RESULTS: A total of 964 patients received 6816 freehand-placed pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine. Fifteen (0.22%) screws that encroached a major vascular structure were identified. Ten (0.29%) thoracic pedicle screws encroached on the aorta, 4 (0.14%) lumbar screws on the common iliac vein, and 1 S1 screw (0.19%) on the internal iliac vein. In consultation with vascular surgery, it was determined whether revision surgery and the technique/approach for the revision procedure should be recommended. Two (0.21%) patients required revision surgery to remove the encroaching pedicle screw (T5 and T8) due to concern for vascular injury. Both patients were asymptomatic and recovered without further complications after revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Vascular encroachment of major vessels occurs rarely in the setting of freehand pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine. Although rare, delayed vascular injury from errant pedicle screw placement has been reported in the literature. The aorta seems to be the vessel at the highest risk of injury. Routine intraoperative or postoperative computed tomographic scanning allows for early identification of pedicle screws encroaching on vascular structures thereby facilitating early revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
研究设计:回顾性病例系列研究。 目的:评估在胸腰椎徒手置入椎弓根螺钉导致血管侵犯的发生率及临床意义。 背景资料总结:椎弓根螺钉常用于有效稳定脊柱的三柱结构,但在解剖结构多变的情况下置入技术要求较高。关于后路内固定手术期间医源性大血管损伤的数据较少。 方法:我们回顾性分析了7年间所有在胸腰椎无影像引导下徒手置入椎弓根螺钉患者的记录。通过回顾所有手术24小时内常规术后计算机断层扫描,确定椎弓根螺钉对血管侵犯的发生率和程度。血管侵犯定义为椎弓根螺钉接触或使大血管壁变形。 结果:共有964例患者在胸腰椎接受了6816枚徒手置入的椎弓根螺钉。发现15枚(0.22%)螺钉侵犯了主要血管结构。10枚(0.29%)胸椎椎弓根螺钉侵犯主动脉,4枚(0.14%)腰椎螺钉侵犯髂总静脉,1枚S1螺钉(0.19%)侵犯髂内静脉。与血管外科会诊后,确定是否应建议翻修手术及翻修手术的技术/入路。2例(0.21%)患者因担心血管损伤,需要翻修手术取出侵犯的椎弓根螺钉(T5和T8)。两名患者均无症状,翻修手术后恢复良好,无进一步并发症。 结论:在胸腰椎徒手置入椎弓根螺钉的情况下,主要血管的侵犯很少发生。虽然罕见,但文献报道了因错误的椎弓根螺钉置入导致的迟发性血管损伤。主动脉似乎是受伤风险最高的血管。术中或术后常规计算机断层扫描有助于早期识别侵犯血管结构的椎弓根螺钉,从而便于早期翻修手术。 证据等级:4级。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010-9
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008-5-1
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008-2
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017-12
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2025-7-9
Front Surg. 2023-6-13
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023-2-27
Neurosurg Rev. 2021-12