Mirza Aleem K, Alvi Mohammed Ali, Naylor Ryan M, Kerezoudis Panagiotis, Krauss William E, Clarke Michelle J, Shepherd Daniel L, Nassr Ahmad, DeMartino Randall R, Bydon Mohamad
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;163:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
Vascular injury is a rare complication of spinal instrumentation. Presentation can vary from immediate hemorrhage to pseudoaneurysm formation. In the literature, surgical approach to repair has varied based on anatomy, acuity of diagnosis, infection, and available technology. In this manuscript, we aim to describe our institutional experience with vascular injuries in thoraco-lumbar spine surgery.
We report our institutional experience of three cases of vascular injury secondary to pedicle screw misplacement and their management, as well as a review of the literature.
The first case had a history of previous instrumentation and presented with back pain and fever. The patient was taken for instrumentation exploration via a posterior approach. Aortic violation was discovered at T6 intraoperatively during instrumentation removal and the patient underwent emergent endovascular repair. The second case presented with chronic back pain after multiple prior posterior fusions and CT angiogram showing screw perforation on the aorta at T10. The patient underwent elective endovascular repair with synchronous removal of the instrumentation. The third case presented with radicular leg pain 6 months after L4-S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion, with CT scan demonstrating the left S1 screw abutting the L5 nerve root and common iliac vein. The patient underwent elective instrumentation revision with intraoperative venography.
Major vascular injury is a known complication of spinal surgery, especially if it involves instrumentation with pedicle screws. Treatment approach has evolved with the advancement of endovascular technology; however, open surgery remains an option when anatomy or infection is prohibitive. In the elective setting, preoperative planning with attention to surgical approach, positioning, and contingencies, should occur in a multidisciplinary fashion. Repair with an aortic stent-graft cuff may minimize unnecessary coverage of the descending thoracic aorta and intercostal arteries.
血管损伤是脊柱内固定术一种罕见的并发症。其表现形式多样,从即刻出血到假性动脉瘤形成不等。在文献中,基于解剖结构、诊断的紧急程度、感染情况以及现有技术,修复手术的方式各不相同。在本论文中,我们旨在描述我们机构在胸腰椎脊柱手术中处理血管损伤的经验。
我们报告了我们机构3例因椎弓根螺钉误置继发血管损伤的病例及其处理方法,并对相关文献进行了综述。
第一例患者曾接受过内固定手术,出现背痛和发热症状。患者通过后路接受内固定探查。在术中取出内固定时于T6发现主动脉受损,患者接受了急诊血管内修复。第二例患者在多次先前的后路融合手术后出现慢性背痛,CT血管造影显示T10处螺钉穿透主动脉。患者接受了择期血管内修复并同步取出内固定。第三例患者在L4 - S1后路腰椎椎间融合术后6个月出现神经根性腿痛,CT扫描显示左侧S1螺钉紧靠L5神经根和髂总静脉。患者接受了择期内固定翻修手术并术中进行了静脉造影。
严重血管损伤是脊柱手术已知的并发症,尤其是涉及椎弓根螺钉内固定时。随着血管内技术的进步,治疗方法也在不断发展;然而,当解剖结构或感染情况不允许时,开放手术仍是一种选择。在择期手术中,应采用多学科方式进行术前规划,关注手术入路、体位和应对措施。使用主动脉覆膜支架袖带进行修复可减少对降主动脉和肋间动脉不必要的覆盖。