• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于药物不良反应检测与评估的临床药理学视角

A clinical pharmacologic perspective on the detection and assessment of adverse drug reactions.

作者信息

Naranjo C A

出版信息

Drug Inf J. 1986;20(4):387-93. doi: 10.1177/009286158602000403.

DOI:10.1177/009286158602000403
PMID:24482869
Abstract

The study of a new drug includes the assessment of its pharmacologic effects, benefits (efficacy), and risks (safety). Most recent drug discontinuations in the United States and the United Kingdom have been associated with problems of safety. The assessment of clinical drug safety is difficult. Those assessing drug safety are confronted with the need to make causality assessment judgments of drug-related events. Several procedures for assessing causality of adverse reactions have been proposed; however, none of them is completely satisfactory. Global introspection (the unaided judgment based on knowledge and experience) and the currently available standardized decision aids (questionnaires or algorithms) have serious limitations that hamper their use. There is a need for better procedures.

摘要

对新药的研究包括对其药理作用、益处(疗效)和风险(安全性)的评估。美国和英国近期停用的大多数药物都与安全性问题有关。临床药物安全性评估很困难。评估药物安全性的人员面临着对药物相关事件进行因果关系评估判断的需求。已经提出了几种评估不良反应因果关系的程序;然而,没有一种是完全令人满意的。整体自省(基于知识和经验的无辅助判断)和目前可用的标准化决策辅助工具(问卷或算法)存在严重局限性,阻碍了它们的使用。需要更好的程序。

相似文献

1
A clinical pharmacologic perspective on the detection and assessment of adverse drug reactions.关于药物不良反应检测与评估的临床药理学视角
Drug Inf J. 1986;20(4):387-93. doi: 10.1177/009286158602000403.
2
Agreement of expert judgment in causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.药物不良反应因果关系评估中专家判断的一致性
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 May;61(3):169-73. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0869-2. Epub 2005 Apr 13.
3
MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale for ICSRs (MONARCSi): A Decision Support Tool for Safety Scientists.改良的 ICSR 中的 Naranjo 因果关系量表(MONARCSi):安全科学家的决策支持工具。
Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1073-1085. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0690-y.
4
Can decisional algorithms replace global introspection in the individual causality assessment of spontaneously reported ADRs?在自发报告的药品不良反应个体因果关系评估中,决策算法能否取代全面的自省?
Drug Saf. 2006;29(8):697-702. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629080-00006.
5
Assessment of causality of individual adverse events following immunization (AEFI): a WHO tool for global use.疫苗不良反应(AEFI)个体不良事件因果关系评估:全球使用的世卫组织工具。
Vaccine. 2013 Oct 17;31(44):5041-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.087. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
6
Causality assessment of adverse drug reaction reports using an expert-defined Bayesian network.使用专家定义的贝叶斯网络评估药物不良反应报告的因果关系。
Artif Intell Med. 2018 Sep;91:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
Can causality assessment fulfill the new European definition of adverse drug reaction? A review of methods used in spontaneous reporting.因果关系评估能否满足新的欧洲药物不良反应定义?自发报告中使用方法的综述。
Pharmacol Res. 2017 Sep;123:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
Drug safety discontinuations in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Spain from 1974 through 1993: a regulatory perspective.1974年至1993年英国、美国和西班牙因药物安全问题导致的药物停用:监管视角
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Jul;58(1):108-17. doi: 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90078-0.
9
Adverse events following immunization: is this time for the use of WHO causality assessment?免疫接种后的不良事件:现在是使用世界卫生组织因果关系评估的时候了吗?
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015 May;14(5):625-7. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1029460. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
10
Causality assessment of adverse effects: when is re-challenge ethically acceptable?
Drug Saf. 2001;24(11):793-9. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124110-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Evidence-Based Herbal Medicines for Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Conceptional Framework for Risk-Benefit Assessment and Regulatory Approaches.基于证据的草药药物在功能性胃肠疾病患者中的应用:风险-效益评估和监管方法的概念框架。
Dig Dis. 2020;38(4):269-279. doi: 10.1159/000504570. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
Pharmacokinetic Properties of Micafungin in Critically Ill Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Candidiasis.重症侵袭性念珠菌病患者米卡芬净的药代动力学特征。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01398-17. Print 2017 Dec.
3
Ertapenem-associated neurotoxicity in the spinal cord injury (SCI) population: A case series.
脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中与厄他培南相关的神经毒性:病例系列
J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Nov;41(6):735-740. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1368960. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
4
The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists.沉思体验的种类:一项关于西方佛教徒中与冥想相关挑战的混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0176239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176239. eCollection 2017.
5
How to Diagnose Early 5-Azacytidine-Induced Pneumonitis: A Case Report.如何早期诊断5-氮杂胞苷所致肺炎:一例报告
Drug Saf Case Rep. 2017 Dec;4(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s40800-017-0047-y.
6
Recent developments in computer-assisted diagnosis of putative adverse drug reactions.计算机辅助诊断疑似药物不良反应的最新进展。
Drug Saf. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(5):315-22. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199106050-00001.