Suppr超能文献

当前用于验证植物药分析方法的各项举措。

Current initiatives for the validation of analytical methods for botanicals.

机构信息

Natural Health and Food Products Research Group, British Columbia Institute of Technology, 3700 Willingdon Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia V5G 3H2, Canada.

Natural Health and Food Products Research Group, British Columbia Institute of Technology, 3700 Willingdon Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia V5G 3H2, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014 Feb;25:124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

Abstract

The demand for validated analytical methods for botanicals has grown in response to the increasing consumer market for botanical supplements. Government initiatives to increase the availability of validated analytical methods and botanical reference material have led to the publication of numerous validation studies in scientific journals. Single laboratory validation and collaborative validation studies are structured to confirm a method's ruggedness and fit for purpose. The performance characteristics and statistical protocols followed throughout a validation study vary with the source of guidelines. Analytical techniques and priority methods are influenced by the need for fast-screening techniques, the limited availability of reference material, market value, and the prevalence of contaminants in botanical supplements.

摘要

由于对植物补充剂的消费者市场不断增长,因此对经过验证的植物分析方法的需求也在增长。政府为增加经过验证的分析方法和植物参考物质的可获得性而采取的举措,导致在科学期刊上发表了许多验证研究。单一实验室验证和协作验证研究的结构旨在确认方法的稳健性和适用性。验证研究中遵循的性能特征和统计方案因指南来源而异。分析技术和优先方法受到快速筛选技术的需求、参考物质的有限可用性、市场价值以及植物补充剂中污染物的普遍性的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验