Private practice, Weatherford, Okla.
Associate program director, Center for Orthodontics, Seton Hill University, Greensburg, Pa.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.034.
The correction of a deviated midline can involve complicated mechanics and a protracted treatment. The threshold below which midline deviations are considered acceptable might depend on multiple factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of facial type on laypersons' perceptions of various degrees of midline deviation.
Smiling photographs of male and female subjects were altered to create 3 facial type variations (euryprosopic, mesoprosopic, and leptoprosopic) and deviations in the midline ranging from 0.0 to 4.0 mm. Evaluators rated the overall attractiveness and acceptability of each photograph.
Data were collected from 160 raters. The overall threshold for the acceptability of a midline deviation was 2.92 ± 1.10 mm, with the threshold for the male subject significantly lower than that for the female subject. The euryprosopic facial type showed no decrease in mean attractiveness until the deviations were 2 mm or more. All other facial types were rated as decreasingly attractive from 1 mm onward. Among all facial types, the attractiveness of the male subject was only affected at deviations of 2 mm or greater; for the female subject, the attractiveness scores were significantly decreased at 1 mm. The mesoprosopic facial type was most attractive for the male subject but was the least attractive for the female subject.
Facial type and sex may affect the thresholds at which a midline deviation is detected and above which a midline deviation is considered unacceptable. Both the euryprosopic facial type and male sex were associated with higher levels of attractiveness at relatively small levels of deviations.
中线偏斜的矫正可能涉及复杂的力学和漫长的治疗过程。可接受的中线偏斜的下限可能取决于多种因素。本研究的目的是评估面型对不同程度中线偏斜的非专业人士感知的影响。
改变男性和女性受试者的微笑照片,创建 3 种面型变化(阔面型、中面型和狭面型)和中线偏差范围从 0.0 到 4.0 毫米。评估者对每张照片的整体吸引力和可接受性进行评分。
从 160 名评分者中收集数据。中线偏斜可接受的总体阈值为 2.92 ± 1.10 毫米,男性受试者的阈值明显低于女性受试者。阔面型直到偏差 2 毫米或更大时,平均吸引力才没有下降。所有其他面型从 1 毫米开始,吸引力逐渐下降。在所有面型中,男性受试者的吸引力仅在偏差 2 毫米或更大时受到影响;对于女性受试者,吸引力评分在 1 毫米时显著降低。中面型对男性受试者最有吸引力,但对女性受试者最没有吸引力。
面型和性别可能会影响到中线偏斜被检测到的阈值,以及中线偏斜被认为不可接受的阈值。阔面型和面型和男性都与较小程度的偏差下相对较高的吸引力相关。