• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同面型中线偏斜的认知。

Perceptions of midline deviations among different facial types.

机构信息

Private practice, Weatherford, Okla.

Associate program director, Center for Orthodontics, Seton Hill University, Greensburg, Pa.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.034.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.034
PMID:24485740
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The correction of a deviated midline can involve complicated mechanics and a protracted treatment. The threshold below which midline deviations are considered acceptable might depend on multiple factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of facial type on laypersons' perceptions of various degrees of midline deviation.

METHODS

Smiling photographs of male and female subjects were altered to create 3 facial type variations (euryprosopic, mesoprosopic, and leptoprosopic) and deviations in the midline ranging from 0.0 to 4.0 mm. Evaluators rated the overall attractiveness and acceptability of each photograph.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 160 raters. The overall threshold for the acceptability of a midline deviation was 2.92 ± 1.10 mm, with the threshold for the male subject significantly lower than that for the female subject. The euryprosopic facial type showed no decrease in mean attractiveness until the deviations were 2 mm or more. All other facial types were rated as decreasingly attractive from 1 mm onward. Among all facial types, the attractiveness of the male subject was only affected at deviations of 2 mm or greater; for the female subject, the attractiveness scores were significantly decreased at 1 mm. The mesoprosopic facial type was most attractive for the male subject but was the least attractive for the female subject.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial type and sex may affect the thresholds at which a midline deviation is detected and above which a midline deviation is considered unacceptable. Both the euryprosopic facial type and male sex were associated with higher levels of attractiveness at relatively small levels of deviations.

摘要

简介

中线偏斜的矫正可能涉及复杂的力学和漫长的治疗过程。可接受的中线偏斜的下限可能取决于多种因素。本研究的目的是评估面型对不同程度中线偏斜的非专业人士感知的影响。

方法

改变男性和女性受试者的微笑照片,创建 3 种面型变化(阔面型、中面型和狭面型)和中线偏差范围从 0.0 到 4.0 毫米。评估者对每张照片的整体吸引力和可接受性进行评分。

结果

从 160 名评分者中收集数据。中线偏斜可接受的总体阈值为 2.92 ± 1.10 毫米,男性受试者的阈值明显低于女性受试者。阔面型直到偏差 2 毫米或更大时,平均吸引力才没有下降。所有其他面型从 1 毫米开始,吸引力逐渐下降。在所有面型中,男性受试者的吸引力仅在偏差 2 毫米或更大时受到影响;对于女性受试者,吸引力评分在 1 毫米时显著降低。中面型对男性受试者最有吸引力,但对女性受试者最没有吸引力。

结论

面型和性别可能会影响到中线偏斜被检测到的阈值,以及中线偏斜被认为不可接受的阈值。阔面型和面型和男性都与较小程度的偏差下相对较高的吸引力相关。

相似文献

1
Perceptions of midline deviations among different facial types.不同面型中线偏斜的认知。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.034.
2
Effects of facial forms and midline deviations and rolls on female facial beauty according to laypeople, orthodontists, and prosthodontists or restorative dentists.根据普通人、正畸医生和修复科医生或牙髓科医生的看法,对面部形态、中线偏斜和颏部曲线对面部美观的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 8;14(1):20900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71262-0.
3
Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.从患者视角评估不同吸引力面孔的微笑美学。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):e171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.022.
4
The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics.轴向中线角度对牙齿美学的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):359-64. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0359:TEOAMA>2.0.CO;2.
5
Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines.面部及前牙中线可观察到的偏移。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Mar;89(3):282-5. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.68.
6
Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.上颌弓宽度和颊廊变化与正畸治疗相关。第 2 部分:拔牙和不拔牙治疗结果的正面微笑吸引力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Mar;145(3):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.019.
7
Quantification of maxillary dental midline deviation in 2D photographs: Methodology trial.二维照片中上颌牙中线偏差的量化:方法学试验。
Int Orthod. 2019 Jun;17(2):312-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
8
Perceptions of midline deviations among different facial types.不同面部类型中线偏差的认知
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jan;147(1):13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.020.
9
Laypersons' perception of facial and dental asymmetries.外行人对面部和牙齿不对称的认知。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(6):e162-71. doi: 10.11607/prd.1618.
10
Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.通过眼动追踪客观评估男性牙齿美学和面部吸引力的贡献。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):523-533. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.016.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Midline Deviation on Smile Attractiveness: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Laypersons.中线偏差对微笑吸引力的影响:一项针对普通人群的横断面研究。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 22;17(2):e79479. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79479. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Influence of facial pattern on the aesthetic assessment of the inclination of the occlusal plane in the frontal view.面部形态对正面观咬合平面倾斜度美学评价的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Mar 11;29(4):178. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06254-z.
3
Clinical Dental Midline Shift Is Not a Predictor of the Side of Shorter Hemimandible: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Diagnostic Study.
临床牙中线偏移并非较短半侧下颌骨一侧的预测指标:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描诊断研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;15(2):161. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020161.
4
Effects of facial forms and midline deviations and rolls on female facial beauty according to laypeople, orthodontists, and prosthodontists or restorative dentists.根据普通人、正畸医生和修复科医生或牙髓科医生的看法,对面部形态、中线偏斜和颏部曲线对面部美观的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 8;14(1):20900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71262-0.
5
Impact of Dental Midline Shift on the Perception of Facial Attractiveness in Young Adults.牙中线偏移对年轻成年人面部吸引力认知的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 5;13(13):3944. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133944.
6
Facial flow line and its effect on dental midline deviation on a female subject in an Asian population - A cross-sectional study.亚洲人群中一名女性受试者的面部流线及其对牙中线偏差的影响——一项横断面研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Nov 2;12:66. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_85_22. eCollection 2023.
7
Perception of facial and dental asymmetries and their impact on oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年对面部及牙齿不对称的认知及其对口腔健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 May;86(3):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00490-2. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
8
Differences in positions of cone-beam computed tomography landmarks in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry according to midsagittal planes.根据正中矢状面,骨骼Ⅲ类面部不对称患者锥束计算机断层扫描标志点位置的差异。
Korean J Orthod. 2023 Jul 25;53(4):219-231. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.015. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
9
Effect of the ethnic, profession, gender, and social background on the perception of upper dental midline deviations in smile esthetics by Chinese and Black raters.中国人和黑人评定者对微笑美观中上颌中线偏斜感知的种族、职业、性别和社会背景影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 14;23(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02893-4.
10
Perception of discrepancy in the upper midline position in conjunction with the gingival display according to various occupations in Iran.根据伊朗不同职业,对上中线位置差异与牙龈暴露情况的感知。
Korean J Orthod. 2023 May 25;53(3):163-174. doi: 10.4041/kjod22.164. Epub 2023 Mar 27.