• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用美国索赔数据库评估多非利特的使用情况。

Assessment of dronedarone utilization using US claims databases.

机构信息

Global Phamacovigilance and Epidemiology, Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey.

Global Phamacovigilance and Epidemiology, Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2014 Feb 1;36(2):264-72.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.01.002
PMID:24486334
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A dronedarone utilization study using US MarketScan and InVision Data Mart databases was conducted to estimate the prevalence of the following: (1) dronedarone use in contraindicated patients with worsening heart failure (HF) or hospitalization for HF within 1 month before dronedarone prescription; (2) concomitant prescribing of contraindicated drugs; and (3) recommended creatinine testing after dronedarone initiation among dronedarone users.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data in the MarketScan database between July 20, 2009, and December 31, 2011, and in the InVision Data Mart database between July 20, 2009, and March 31, 2012, were analyzed. The study population included patients who received ≥1 dronedarone prescription during the study period. The following variables were reported: worsening of or hospitalization for HF, concomitant prescribing of potent cytochrome P450 CYP 3A4 inhibitors or QT-prolonging drugs, and creatinine testing.

RESULTS

There were 31,408 and 7025 dronedarone users identified in the MarketScan and InVision Data Mart databases, respectively. Approximately 86% to 90% of patients had a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in each database. In the MarketScan database, 40% were women and 54% were aged ≥65 years. In the InVision Data Mart database, 31% were women and 32% were aged ≥65 years. The corresponding prevalence of worsening or hospitalization for HF was 6.4% (95% CI, 6.2-6.7) and 4.7% (95% CI, 4.2-5.2) in each database, respectively. The corresponding estimates of concomitant prescribing of potent cytochrome P450 CYP 3A4 inhibitors and QT-prolonging drugs within 30 days before initiation or refilling of dronedarone were 2.0% (95% CI, 1.8-2.1) and 10.0% (95% CI, 9.7-10.4), respectively, in the MarketScan database, and 2.3% (95% CI, 2.0-2.7) and 11.2% (95% CI, 10.5-12.0) in the InVision Data Mart database. More than 50% of patients in each database had serum creatinine tests conducted after dronedarone initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present analysis based on a long-term follow-up (nearly 3 years) were consistent with the previous findings that dronedarone has mostly been used appropriately in compliance with US prescribing in the target populations.

摘要

背景

使用美国 MarketScan 和 InVision 数据集市数据库进行了一项关于决奈达隆使用情况的研究,旨在评估以下情况的发生率:(1)在开始决奈达隆处方前 1 个月内,因心力衰竭(HF)恶化或因 HF 住院而被禁忌的患者使用决奈达隆;(2)同时开禁忌药物;(3)在开始决奈达隆后建议进行肌酐检测。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了 MarketScan 数据库中 2009 年 7 月 20 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日和 InVision 数据集市数据库中 2009 年 7 月 20 日至 2012 年 3 月 31 日的数据。研究人群包括在研究期间至少接受 1 次决奈达隆处方的患者。报告了以下变量:HF 恶化或住院、同时开具强细胞色素 P450 CYP3A4 抑制剂或 QT 延长药物、以及肌酐检测。

结果

在 MarketScan 和 InVision 数据集市数据库中分别确定了 31408 例和 7025 例决奈达隆使用者。每个数据库中约有 86%至 90%的患者被诊断为心房颤动。在 MarketScan 数据库中,40%为女性,54%年龄≥65 岁。在 InVision 数据集市数据库中,31%为女性,32%年龄≥65 岁。每个数据库中 HF 恶化或住院的发生率分别为 6.4%(95%CI,6.2-6.7)和 4.7%(95%CI,4.2-5.2)。在开始或重新开决奈达隆处方前 30 天内,同时开具强细胞色素 P450 CYP3A4 抑制剂和 QT 延长药物的估计比例分别为 2.0%(95%CI,1.8-2.1)和 10.0%(95%CI,9.7-10.4),在 MarketScan 数据库中为 2.3%(95%CI,2.0-2.7)和 11.2%(95%CI,10.5-12.0)。每个数据库中超过 50%的患者在开始决奈达隆后进行了血清肌酐检测。

结论

本分析基于长期随访(近 3 年)的结果与之前的发现一致,即决奈达隆主要是在美国目标人群中按照规定使用,符合规定。

相似文献

1
Assessment of dronedarone utilization using US claims databases.利用美国索赔数据库评估多非利特的使用情况。
Clin Ther. 2014 Feb 1;36(2):264-72.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
2
Evaluation of dronedarone use in the US patient population between 2009 and 2010: a descriptive study using a claims database.2009 年至 2010 年期间美国患者人群中使用多非利特的评估:使用索赔数据库进行的描述性研究。
Clin Ther. 2011 Oct;33(10):1483-1490.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
3
Antiarrhythmic drug use in patients <65 years with atrial fibrillation and without structural heart disease.年龄<65岁且无结构性心脏病的房颤患者使用抗心律失常药物的情况。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 1;115(3):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
4
Dronedarone: current evidence and future questions.多非利特:现有证据和未来问题。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Spring;28(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2009.00112.x.
5
Dronedarone. atrial fibrillation: too many questions about long-term adverse effects.决奈达隆。心房颤动:关于长期不良反应存在诸多疑问。
Prescrire Int. 2010 Aug;19(108):149-52.
6
Meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes with dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation or heart failure.达比加群酯在心房颤动或心力衰竭患者中的心血管结局的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Aug 15;110(4):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.034. Epub 2012 May 19.
7
Increased mortality after dronedarone therapy for severe heart failure.决奈达隆治疗严重心力衰竭后死亡率增加。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2678-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800456.
8
Rhythm- and rate-controlling effects of dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation (from the ATHENA trial).在心房颤动患者中(来自 ATHENA 试验),决奈达隆的节律和速率控制作用。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):1019-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.028. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
9
Efficacy and safety of dronedarone: a review of randomized trials.盐酸决奈达隆的有效性和安全性:随机试验的综述。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010 Jan;9(1):189-99. doi: 10.1517/14740330903514105.
10
Cost-effectiveness of dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation in the ATHENA trial.ATHENA 试验中,使用决奈达隆治疗心房颤动患者的成本效益分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Oct;29(10):1249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Reporting on the Evaluation of Risk Minimization Programs: A Systematic Review.风险最小化计划评估报告质量的评价:系统综述。
Drug Saf. 2020 May;43(5):427-446. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00905-8.