Manoucheri Elmira, Fuchs-Weizman Noga, Cohen Sarah L, Wang Karen C, Einarsson Jon
Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):592-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.122. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
To evaluate the adverse events encountered during robotic gynecologic surgery, as reported to the FDA MAUDE database from January 2006 to December 2012.
Database search (Canadian Task Force classification III).
A search of the FDA MAUDE database was performed by brand name "da Vinci" and manufacturer "Intuitive Surgical." Reports reflecting gynecologic procedures either by description or procedure name were included. A record of reports was kept to ensure that no duplicates were added. The date and type of event (operator-related error, technical system failure, or surgical injuries attributed to use of the robot) and the clinical outcome were recorded.
Twenty-six percent of reported events (n = 73) resulted in injury, and 8.5% (n = 24) resulted in death. Of note, although adnexal procedures were performed in <3% of the cohort, they accounted for 20% of the fatalities. Twenty-one percent of injuries were attributed to operator-related error, and 14% to technical system failure; 65% were not directly related to use of the robot. Fifteen deaths were reported during planned hysterectomy. Four of those were due to injury to a major blood vessel (iliac artery in 3, and aorta in 1), although a detailed description of how the injury occurred was absent from the event description.
It is important to continue to evaluate the occurrence of injuries during robot-assisted surgery in an effort to identify unique challenges associated with this advanced technology.
评估2006年1月至2012年12月期间向美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告数据库(FDA MAUDE数据库)报告的机器人妇科手术中遇到的不良事件。
数据库检索(加拿大工作组分类III级)。
通过品牌名“达芬奇”和制造商“直观外科公司”对FDA MAUDE数据库进行检索。纳入通过描述或手术名称反映妇科手术的报告。保留报告记录以确保不添加重复报告。记录事件的日期和类型(与操作者相关的错误、技术系统故障或因使用机器人导致的手术损伤)以及临床结果。
报告的事件中有26%(n = 73)导致受伤,8.5%(n = 24)导致死亡。值得注意的是,尽管附件手术在队列中占比不到3%,但却占死亡病例的20%。21%的损伤归因于与操作者相关的错误,14%归因于技术系统故障;65%与使用机器人没有直接关系。在计划性子宫切除术中报告了15例死亡。其中4例是由于主要血管损伤(3例为髂动脉,1例为主动脉),尽管事件描述中没有关于损伤如何发生的详细描述。
继续评估机器人辅助手术期间损伤的发生情况,以识别与这项先进技术相关的独特挑战,这一点很重要。