• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大脑中语义和词汇知识的分类组织。

The categorical organization of semantic and lexical knowledge in the brain.

机构信息

Institute of Neurology of the Catholic University of Rome, Policlinico Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli, 8-00168 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Neurol. 1990;3(2):109-15. doi: 10.3233/BEN-1990-3205.

DOI:10.3233/BEN-1990-3205
PMID:24487149
Abstract

In recent years several papers have shown that different verbal and non-verbal semantic categories can be selectively disrupted by brain damage and that consistent anatomical localizations correspond to each category-specific semantic disorder.This paper aims to suggest that the brain regions typically damaged in a given type of category-specific semantic disorder might be critically involved in processing the kind of information which mainly contributes to organizing that semantic category and to distinguishing among its members.This general hypothesis is discussed taking into account: (a) comprehension and production of object names (nouns) and of action names (verbs) in agrammatic and in anomic aphasic patients; (b) verbal and non-verbal identification of body parts; (c) verbal and non-verbal identification of living beings and of man made artefacts.

摘要

近年来,有几篇论文表明,不同的言语和非言语语义类别可以被大脑损伤选择性地破坏,并且一致的解剖定位与每个特定语义障碍类别相对应。本文旨在提出这样一种假设,即特定类型的语义障碍中通常受损的大脑区域可能在处理主要有助于组织该语义类别并区分其成员的信息方面起着关键作用。在考虑到以下因素的情况下,讨论了这一一般假设:(a)语法和命名性失语症患者对物体名称(名词)和动作名称(动词)的理解和产生;(b)身体部位的言语和非言语识别;(c)生物和人造物品的言语和非言语识别。

相似文献

1
The categorical organization of semantic and lexical knowledge in the brain.大脑中语义和词汇知识的分类组织。
Behav Neurol. 1990;3(2):109-15. doi: 10.3233/BEN-1990-3205.
2
Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: a critical survey.类别特异性语义障碍的神经解剖学关联:一项批判性综述。
Memory. 1995 Sep-Dec;3(3-4):247-64. doi: 10.1080/09658219508253153.
3
Selective preservation of a lexical category in aphasia: dissociations in comprehension of body parts and geographical place names following focal brain lesion.失语症中词汇类别的选择性保留:局灶性脑损伤后身体部位和地理名称理解的分离
Memory. 1993 Dec;1(4):313-28. doi: 10.1080/09658219308258241.
4
The trouble with nouns and verbs in Greek fluent aphasia.希腊语流利性失语症中名词和动词的问题。
J Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb;41(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
5
Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain.大脑中名词和动词的词汇组织
Nature. 1991 Feb 28;349(6312):788-90. doi: 10.1038/349788a0.
6
Selectivity of lexical-semantic disorders in Polish-speaking patients with aphasia: evidence from single-word comprehension.波兰语失语症患者词汇语义障碍的选择性:来自单词理解的证据。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Sep;23(5):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
7
Selective impairment of living things and musical instruments on a verbal 'Semantic Knowledge Questionnaire' in a case of apperceptive visual agnosia.知觉性视觉失认症病例在言语“语义知识问卷”上对生物和乐器的选择性损伤。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Oct;80(1):155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
8
Selective preservation of memory for people in the context of semantic memory disorder: patterns of association and dissociation.语义记忆障碍背景下对人的记忆选择性保存:关联与分离模式
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(14):2887-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
9
The noun/verb dissociation in language production: varieties of causes.语言产生中的名词/动词分离:各种原因。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar 1;21(2):103-23. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000311.
10
Preservation of memory for people in semantic memory disorder: Further category-specific semantic dissociation.语义记忆障碍人群的记忆保存:进一步的类别特异性语义分离。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Mar 1;19(2):113-33. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000114.

引用本文的文献

1
Why are the right and left hemisphere conceptual representations different?左右半球的概念表示为何不同?
Behav Neurol. 2014;2014:603134. doi: 10.1155/2014/603134. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
2
The evaluation of sources of knowledge underlying different conceptual categories.不同概念类别知识来源的评估。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Feb 21;7:40. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00040. eCollection 2013.
3
The role of body-related and environmental sources of knowledge in the construction of different conceptual categories.身体相关和环境知识源在不同概念类别构建中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 29;3:430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00430. eCollection 2012.
4
Repetition priming within and between languages in verb generation: evidence for shared verb concepts.在动词生成中,语言内和语言间的重复启动:动词概念共享的证据。
Memory. 2012;20(4):358-73. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.667109. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
5
Category-specific deficits for grammatical classes of words: evidence for possible anatomical correlates.
Ital J Neurol Sci. 1993 Jan;14(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02339048.