• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

触忽视是否可能发生在肢体内部水平?右侧大脑损伤患者的振动触觉反应时间。

Can tactile neglect occur at an intra-limb level? Vibrotactile reaction times in patients with right hemisphere damage.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Neurol. 1994;7(2):67-77. doi: 10.3233/BEN-1994-7204.

DOI:10.3233/BEN-1994-7204
PMID:24487290
Abstract

Visual reaction time (RT) studies on patients with right hemisphere (RH) damage have demonstrated that the attentional imbalance to stimuli occupying left and right positions exists even within the "intact" ipsilesional hemifield. The purpose of the present study was to test whether such patients might also exhibit relative left-sided impairments in the tactile modality, where stimuli and responses involve the index and middle fingers of the non-hemiplegic ipsilesional hand. Eight patients with RH damage, and eight matched normal controls, were tested using a vibrotactile choice RT paradigm, with the responding hand held in prone or supine posture, and located either at the body midline, or in left or right hemispace. Patients showed significantly slower RTs with the left than the right finger in both hand postures, a difference which remained constant as a function of the hemispatial location of the responding hand. In the prone posture, patients' left finger RTs were slower than those of controls, who showed no difference between left and right finger RTs, while their right finger RTs were faster than those of controls. In the supine posture, both patients and controls exhibited slower left than right finger RTs, though in controls the left finger disadvantage was attributed to biomechanical rather than attentional factors. Patients also made more errors with left than right finger stimuli, both as failures of detection and as incorrect responses, while controls made fewer errors overall and showed no differences between fingers. These data demonstrate a bias in the distribution of attention to tactile stimuli at an intra-limb level, and suggest that the attentional imbalance created by RH damage may be supramodal.

摘要

对右脑(RH)损伤患者的视觉反应时间(RT)研究表明,即使在“完整”的同侧视野内,对占据左右位置的刺激也存在注意力不平衡。本研究的目的是测试此类患者是否在触觉模态中也表现出相对的左侧损伤,其中刺激和反应涉及非偏瘫同侧手的食指和中指。使用振动触觉选择 RT 范式对 8 名右脑损伤患者和 8 名匹配的正常对照者进行了测试,反应手分别处于俯卧或仰卧姿势,位于身体中线或左侧或右侧半空间。患者在两种手姿势下用左手的 RT 明显慢于右手,这种差异随着反应手的半空间位置而保持不变。在俯卧姿势下,患者的左手 RT 比对照组慢,对照组左手和右手 RT 之间没有差异,而他们的右手 RT 比对照组快。在仰卧姿势下,患者和对照组的左手 RT 都比右手 RT 慢,尽管在对照组中,左手的劣势归因于生物力学因素而不是注意力因素。患者用左手刺激的错误也比右手多,既包括检测失败,也包括错误反应,而对照组总的错误较少,且手指之间没有差异。这些数据表明,在肢体内部水平上,触觉刺激的注意力分布存在偏差,并且表明右脑损伤引起的注意力不平衡可能是超模式的。

相似文献

1
Can tactile neglect occur at an intra-limb level? Vibrotactile reaction times in patients with right hemisphere damage.触忽视是否可能发生在肢体内部水平?右侧大脑损伤患者的振动触觉反应时间。
Behav Neurol. 1994;7(2):67-77. doi: 10.3233/BEN-1994-7204.
2
Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?右侧半球病变患者的目标驱动选择性注意:同侧视野的完整性如何?
Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):168-81. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh690. Epub 2005 Nov 29.
3
Severity of neglect predicts accuracy of imitation in patients with right hemisphere lesions.忽视的严重程度可预测右半球病变患者的模仿准确性。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov;47(13):2948-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.024. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
4
Vibrotactile reaction times in unilateral neglect. The effects of hand location, rehabilitation and eyes open/closed.单侧忽视中的振动触觉反应时间。手部位置、康复治疗以及睁眼/闭眼的影响。
Brain. 1988 Dec;111 ( Pt 6):1531-45. doi: 10.1093/brain/111.6.1531.
5
Visual and spatial modulation of tactile extinction: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.触觉消退的视觉和空间调制:行为学和电生理学证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 25;6:217. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00217. eCollection 2012.
6
Where are my hands? Influence of limb posture on tactile extinction.我的手在哪里?肢体姿势对触觉失认的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2012 May;26(3):323-33. doi: 10.1037/a0027994. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
7
Dissecting the component deficits of perceptual imbalance in visual neglect: evidence from horizontal-vertical length comparisons.剖析视觉忽视中知觉失衡的成分缺失:来自水平-垂直长度比较的证据。
Cortex. 2012 May;48(5):540-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
8
Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect.动态自下而上特征和自上而下控制对视空间忽略症患者对移动真实场景视觉探索的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Aug;50(10):2415-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
9
Visuospatial asymmetry and non-spatial attention in subacute stroke patients with and without neglect.亚急性期忽视症和非忽视症脑卒中患者的视空间不对称与非空间注意力
Cortex. 2010 May;46(5):602-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
10
The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients.偏侧忽视患者完整视野中视觉注意力的分配
Cortex. 1990 Sep;26(3):307-17. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80083-4.