Suppr超能文献

交叉性失语症。二:为什么深部病变相对于标准失语症而言更为多见?

Crossed aphasia. II: Why are deep lesions overrepresented with respect to standard aphasia?

机构信息

Neuropsychology Unit, Neurology Department, Salvatore Maugeri Clinica del Lavoro Foundation, Medical Centre of Rehabilitation, Veruno (NO), Italy.

Milan University, Clinic for Nervous Diseases, S. Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Neurol. 1996;9(3):163-70. doi: 10.3233/BEN-1996-93-408.

Abstract

In this paper we have reviewed the cases of vascular crossed aphasia reported in the literature, in order to check whether deep lesions are really overrepresented in crossed aphasia with respect to standard aphasia. The comparison with a large sample of standard left-hemisphere-damaged aphasics revealed a significantly higher incidence of purely deep lesions in crossed aphasics than in standard aphasics. The overrepresentation of deep lesions in crossed aphasia appears to be contingent on the co-occurrence of aphasia and Unilateral Neglect after right-hemisphere lesion. This suggests an interaction between language and attentional mechanisms in the case of reversed language lateralisation: the overcrowding of these functions in the right hemisphere could make language more vulnerable after right deep lesions.

摘要

在本文中,我们回顾了文献中报道的血管交叉性失语症病例,以检查在交叉性失语症中,深部病变是否真的比标准失语症更为常见。与大量标准左半球损伤性失语症患者的比较显示,交叉性失语症患者中纯深部病变的发生率明显高于标准失语症患者。交叉性失语症中深部病变的过度表现似乎取决于右侧半球损伤后失语症和单侧忽略的共同发生。这表明在语言侧化逆转的情况下,语言和注意力机制之间存在相互作用:这些功能在右半球过度拥挤可能会使右半球深部病变后语言更加脆弱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验