Magazine H I, Carter J M, Russell J K, Torres B A, Dunn B M, Johnson H M
Department of Comparative and Experimental Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Feb;85(4):1237-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.4.1237.
We previously have assigned N-terminal specificity to three hamster monoclonal antibodies (mAbs I, II, and III) produced to mouse recombinant gamma interferon (IFN-gamma), based on the ability of the N-terminal peptide IFN-gamma-(1-39) to block binding of 125I-labeled IFN-gamma (125I-IFN-gamma) and on the ability of these antibodies to bind 125I-IFN-gamma-(1-39). Only mAb I blocked function and binding to the IFN-gamma receptor, suggesting that it may bind to a region of the molecule involved in interaction with the receptor. To further define the epitope specificities of the antibodies, a series of N-terminal peptides were synthesized and tested for their ability to block antibody binding of 125I-IFN-gamma. Peptides IFN-gamma-(1-39), IFN-gamma-(1-20), IFN-gamma-(3-20), and IFN-gamma-(5-20) inhibited binding of 125I-IFN-gamma by mAb I in order of decreasing effectiveness, while peptide IFN-gamma-(7-20) was without effect. Peptides IFN-gamma-(1-39), IFN-gamma-(1-20), and IFN-gamma-(3-20) also inhibited binding of 125I-IFN-gamma by mAb II but were less effective when compared with their inhibition of mAb I. IFN-gamma-(5-20) and IFN-gamma-(7-20) did not inhibit binding by mAb II. Peptides IFN-gamma-(1-10), IFN-gamma-(10-30), and IFN-gamma-(21-44) did not inhibit either mAb I or mAb II. While IFN-gamma-(1-39) and IFN-gamma-(10-30) inhibited binding by mAb III, neither IFN-gamma-(1-20) nor any of its truncated forms were inhibitory. All three antibodies had similar Kd values for 125I-IFN-gamma. A prediction of the secondary structure of the molecule and the peptide inhibition data suggest that the epitope (possible receptor binding region) for mAb I involves a loop in the area containing residues 12-20, with sequences N-terminal to these residues possibly stabilizing the loop conformation. Direct evidence that the N-terminal 1-39 region of IFN-gamma is important in receptor binding was the observation that IFN-gamma-(1-39), but not the C-terminal IFN-gamma-(95-133), competed with 125I-IFN-gamma for the receptor on mouse L cells. IFN-gamma-(1-39) also specifically blocked IFN-gamma antiviral activity at concentrations that blocked binding to the receptor. The fact that IFN-gamma-(1-39) was the only peptide that blocked both IFN-gamma binding to receptor and function is consistent with the antibody competition data, where it was the most effective peptide in blocking binding of 125I-IFN-gamma by the N-terminal-specific mAbs. The combination of peptide mapping of epitope specificities and receptor competition should further help define the structural basis for IFN-gamma action.
我们之前根据N端肽IFN-γ-(1-39)阻断125I标记的IFN-γ(125I-IFN-γ)结合的能力以及这些抗体结合125I-IFN-γ-(1-39)的能力,将针对小鼠重组γ干扰素(IFN-γ)产生的三种仓鼠单克隆抗体(单克隆抗体I、II和III)的N端特异性进行了分配。只有单克隆抗体I阻断功能并与IFN-γ受体结合,这表明它可能与分子中参与与受体相互作用的区域结合。为了进一步确定抗体的表位特异性,合成了一系列N端肽,并测试它们阻断125I-IFN-γ抗体结合的能力。肽IFN-γ-(1-39)、IFN-γ-(1-20)、IFN-γ-(3-20)和IFN-γ-(5-20)按效力递减顺序抑制单克隆抗体I对125I-IFN-γ的结合,而肽IFN-γ-(7-20)无效。肽IFN-γ-(1-39)、IFN-γ-(1-20)和IFN-γ-(3-20)也抑制单克隆抗体II对125I-IFN-γ的结合,但与它们对单克隆抗体I的抑制作用相比效果较差。IFN-γ-(5-20)和IFN-γ-(7-20)不抑制单克隆抗体II的结合。肽IFN-γ-(1-10)、IFN-γ-(10-30)和IFN-γ-(21-44)既不抑制单克隆抗体I也不抑制单克隆抗体II。虽然IFN-γ-(1-39)和IFN-γ-(10-30)抑制单克隆抗体III的结合,但IFN-γ-(1-20)及其任何截短形式均无抑制作用。所有三种抗体对125I-IFN-γ的Kd值相似。分子二级结构预测和肽抑制数据表明,单克隆抗体I的表位(可能的受体结合区域)涉及包含残基12-20区域的一个环,这些残基N端的序列可能稳定环的构象。IFN-γ的N端1-39区域在受体结合中很重要的直接证据是观察到IFN-γ-(1-39)而非C端的IFN-γ-(95-133)与125I-IFN-γ竞争小鼠L细胞上的受体。IFN-γ-(1-39)在阻断与受体结合的浓度下也特异性阻断IFN-γ的抗病毒活性。IFN-γ-(1-39)是唯一既能阻断IFN-γ与受体结合又能阻断其功能的肽,这与抗体竞争数据一致,在该数据中它是阻断N端特异性单克隆抗体对125I-IFN-γ结合的最有效肽。表位特异性的肽图谱分析和受体竞争的结合应进一步有助于确定IFN-γ作用的结构基础。