Department of Physiotherapy, College of Medical Sciences, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e87233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087233. eCollection 2014.
Accurate assessment of physical activity to identify current levels and changes within the population is dependent on the precision of the measurement tools. The aim of this study was to compare components of physical activity measured with an adapted version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Hausa IPAQ-SF) and the accelerometer in a sample of Nigeria adults.
One hundred and forty-four participants (Mean age = 32.6 ± 9.9 years, 40.3% women) in a cross-sectional study wore an accelerometer for seven consecutive days and completed the Hausa IPAQ-SF questionnaire on the eighth day. Total physical activity, time spent in moderate-to-vigorous activity (MVPA) and sedentary time assessed by Hausa IPAQ-SF and accelerometer were compared. The absolute and criterion- related validity of the Hausa IPAQ-SF was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and Spearman Correlation Coefficients, respectively. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated to classify individuals according to the global standard guideline for sufficient physical activity.
Compared with the accelerometer, higher time in MVPA and total physical activity were reported on the Hausa IPAQ-SF (p<0.001), while low to moderate correlations (Rs = 0.03-0.38) were found between the two methods. The 95% limits of agreement were wide between methods for total physical activity (-23019 to 20375 METmin.d(-1)) and sedentary time (-510 to 150 min.d(-1)). The sensitivity (76.2%) of Hausa IPAQ-SF to identify insufficiently active people was good, but its specificity (33.3%) to correctly classify sufficiently active people was low.
The Hausa IPAQ-SF overestimated components of physical activity among Nigerian adults, and demonstrated poor to moderate evidence of absolute and criterion validity. Further evaluation of IPAQ and other self-report physical activity instruments in other Africa populations could enhance accurate evaluation of physical activity data in the region countries.
准确评估体力活动以识别人群中的当前水平和变化取决于测量工具的精度。本研究的目的是比较用经过改编的国际体力活动问卷(豪萨 IPAQ-SF)和加速度计测量的体力活动成分,在尼日利亚成年人样本中。
在一项横断面研究中,144 名参与者(平均年龄=32.6±9.9 岁,40.3%为女性)佩戴加速度计连续 7 天,并在第 8 天完成豪萨 IPAQ-SF 问卷。比较豪萨 IPAQ-SF 和加速度计评估的总体力活动、中高强度体力活动(MVPA)时间和久坐时间。通过 Bland-Altman 分析和 Spearman 相关系数分别评估豪萨 IPAQ-SF 的绝对和标准相关性效度。根据全球足够体力活动标准指南,计算特异性和敏感性以对个体进行分类。
与加速度计相比,豪萨 IPAQ-SF 报告的 MVPA 和总体力活动时间更高(p<0.001),而两种方法之间的相关性较低(Rs=0.03-0.38)。两种方法之间的总体力活动(-23019 至 20375 METmin.d(-1))和久坐时间(-510 至 150 min.d(-1))的 95%一致性界限很宽。豪萨 IPAQ-SF 识别体力活动不足者的敏感性(76.2%)良好,但特异性(33.3%)正确分类体力活动充足者较低。
豪萨 IPAQ-SF 高估了尼日利亚成年人的体力活动成分,并且对绝对和标准有效性的证据较差。在其他非洲人群中进一步评估 IPAQ 和其他自我报告的体力活动工具可以增强该地区国家对体力活动数据的准确评估。