Holst Mette, Rasmussen Henrik Højgaard
Department of Gastroenterology, Centre for Nutrition and Bowel Disease (CET), Aalborg University Hospital, Faculty of Planning, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
J Nutr Metab. 2013;2013:463751. doi: 10.1155/2013/463751. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
Aims and Objectives. This study aimed to investigate barriers for nutrition therapy in the transition between hospital and home and hereby to identify areas for potential improvements. Background. Though the focus on nutritional risk is improving in hospital, there seems to be less effort to maintain or even improve nutritional status after discharge and during the rehabilitation period. Design. Qualitative focus group interviews. Methods. Semistructured focus group interviews with experienced multiprofessional staff from hospital, home care, nursing homes, and general practise. The study was done in the county of Aalborg with about 280.000 inhabitants regarding homecare and general practise as well as Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark. Results. Interviews were generated with 41 professionals from hospital, general practise, and home care. Barriers identified between settings included the following aspects: economic, organisation, and education. The impression of professionals was that few patients are discharged with nutrition therapy, compared to who could benefit from nutrition therapy after discharge. Most often, reasons were a short in-hospital stay and lack of knowledge and interest. Moreover, lack of clinical guidelines throughout all settings, time consumption, lack of transparency regarding economy and workflows, and lack of assistance from experts regarding complicated nutritional problems were identified. Conclusions. Many barriers were found in hospital as well as in the community and general practise. These were most often practical as well as organizational. Improvements of clinical guidelines and instructions and improvement of knowledge and communication at all levels are needed. Relevance to Clinical Practise. This study emphasizes that responsibility needs to be taken for patients whom are still at nutritional risk at discharge, and even before hospitalization. Nurses and doctors in and outside hospital are in need of improved knowledge, standard care plans, and instructions.
目的。本研究旨在调查医院与家庭过渡阶段营养治疗的障碍,从而确定潜在的改进领域。背景。尽管医院对营养风险的关注度有所提高,但出院后及康复期间在维持甚至改善营养状况方面的努力似乎较少。设计。定性焦点小组访谈。方法。对来自医院、家庭护理、养老院和全科医疗的经验丰富的多专业工作人员进行半结构化焦点小组访谈。该研究在奥尔堡县进行,涉及约28万居民的家庭护理和全科医疗以及丹麦奥尔堡大学医院。结果。对来自医院、全科医疗和家庭护理的41名专业人员进行了访谈。不同机构之间发现的障碍包括以下方面:经济、组织和教育。专业人员的印象是,与出院后可从营养治疗中获益的患者相比,出院时接受营养治疗的患者很少。最常见的原因是住院时间短以及缺乏知识和兴趣。此外,还发现所有机构都缺乏临床指南、时间消耗大、经济和工作流程缺乏透明度,以及在处理复杂营养问题方面缺乏专家协助。结论。在医院以及社区和全科医疗中发现了许多障碍。这些障碍大多是实际操作和组织方面的。需要改进临床指南和说明,并提高各级的知识水平和沟通能力。与临床实践的相关性。本研究强调,对于出院时甚至住院前仍存在营养风险的患者,需要承担责任。医院内外的护士和医生需要提高知识水平、制定标准护理计划并提供说明。