U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA;
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Richard Russell Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Eastern Laboratory Outbreaks Section, Athens, GA 30605, USA.
J Food Prot. 2014 Feb;77(2):180-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-248.
The "top-six" non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) most frequently associated with outbreaks and cases of foodborne illnesses have been declared as adulterants in beef by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Regulatory testing in beef began in June 2012. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the DuPont BAX System method for detecting these top six STEC strains and strains of E. coli O157:H7. For STEC, the BAX System real-time STEC suite was evaluated, including a screening assay for the stx and eae virulence genes and two panel assays to identify the target serogroups: panel 1 detects O26, O111, and O121, and panel 2 detects O45, O103, O145. For E. coli O157:H7, the BAX System real-time PCR assay for this specific serotype was used. Sensitivity of each assay for the PCR targets was ≥1.23 × 10(3) CFU/ml in pure culture. Each assay was 100% inclusive for the strains tested (20 to 50 per assay), and no cross-reactivity with closely related strains was observed in any of the assays. The performance of the BAX System methods was compared with that of the FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) methods for detection of the top six STEC and E. coli O157:H7 strains in ground beef and beef trim. Generally, results of the BAX System method were similar to those of the MLG methods for detecting non-O157 STEC and E. coli O157:H7. Reducing or eliminating novobiocin in modified tryptic soy broth (mTSB) may improve the detection of STEC O111 strains; one beef trim sample inoculated with STEC O111 produced a negative result when enriched in mTSB with 8 mg/liter novobiocin but was positive when enriched in mTSB without novobiocin. The results of this study indicate the feasibility of deploying a panel of real-time PCR assay configurations for the detection and monitoring of the top six STEC and E. coli O157:H7 strains in beef. The approach could easily be adapted for additional multiplex assays should regulations expand to include other O serogroups or virulence genes.
“六大”非 O157 志贺毒素产生大肠杆菌(STEC)血清群(O26、O45、O103、O111、O121 和 O145)与食源性疾病暴发和病例最常相关,已被美国农业部食品安全检验局(FSIS)宣布为牛肉中的掺杂物。2012 年 6 月开始对牛肉进行监管测试。本研究旨在评估杜邦 BAX 系统方法检测这六种主要 STEC 菌株和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 菌株的能力。对于 STEC,评估了 BAX System 实时 STEC 套件,包括stx 和 eae 毒力基因的筛选检测以及两个用于鉴定目标血清群的小组检测:第 1 组检测 O26、O111 和 O121,第 2 组检测 O45、O103、O145。对于大肠杆菌 O157:H7,使用了 BAX System 针对该特定血清型的实时 PCR 检测。每种检测方法对 PCR 靶标的灵敏度均≥1.23×103CFU/ml 在纯培养物中。每种检测方法对所测试的菌株均具有 100%包容性(每种检测方法 20 至 50 株),并且在任何检测中都没有观察到与密切相关菌株的交叉反应。BAX System 方法的性能与 FSIS 微生物实验室指南(MLG)方法进行比较,以检测 ground beef 和 beef trim 中的六种主要 STEC 和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 菌株。一般来说,BAX System 方法检测非 O157 STEC 和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的结果与 MLG 方法相似。在改良胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤(mTSB)中减少或消除新生霉素可能会提高 STEC O111 菌株的检测能力;在添加 8mg/L 新生霉素的 mTSB 中富集时,一种牛肉修剪样本接种 STEC O111 后产生阴性结果,但在没有新生霉素的 mTSB 中富集时呈阳性。本研究结果表明,在牛肉中检测和监测六大 STEC 和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 菌株的实时 PCR 检测面板配置具有可行性。如果法规扩展到包括其他 O 血清群或毒力基因,则可以轻松适应额外的多重检测。