Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, University of Aix-Marseille.
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh.
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1620-7. doi: 10.1037/a0035867. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
How does cognitive control change with age, and what are the processes underlying these changes? This question has been extensively studied using versions of the task-switching paradigm, which allow participants to actively prepare for the upcoming task (Kray, Eber, & Karbach, 2008). Little is known, however, about age-related changes in this ability across the life span when there is no opportunity to anticipate task goals. We examined the effect of 2 kinds of verbal self-instruction-labeling either the task goal or the relevant feature of the stimulus-on 2 components of cognitive control, goal setting and switching, in children, young adults, and older adults. All participants performed single-task blocks and mixed-task blocks (involving unpredictable switching between 2 tasks) in silent and labeling conditions. Participants categorized bidimensional stimuli either by picture or by color, depending on their spatial position in a 2-cell vertical grid. Response times revealed an inverted U shape in performance with age. These age differences were more pronounced for goal setting than for switching, thus generalizing results obtained in situations taping proactive control to this new context forcing reactive control. Further, differential age-related effects of verbalization were also obtained. Verbalizations were detrimental for young adults, beneficial for older adults, and had mixed effects in children. These differences are interpreted in terms of qualitative developmental changes in reactive goal-setting strategies.
认知控制随年龄如何变化,这些变化的背后过程是什么?这个问题已经通过任务转换范式的各种版本得到了广泛研究,该范式允许参与者主动为即将到来的任务做准备(Kray、Eber 和 Karbach,2008)。然而,当没有机会预测任务目标时,关于整个生命周期中这种能力的与年龄相关的变化,我们知之甚少。我们研究了 2 种口头自我指导——标签任务目标或刺激的相关特征——对认知控制的 2 个组成部分(目标设定和转换)的影响,参与者包括儿童、年轻人和老年人。所有参与者在静默和标签条件下执行单任务块和混合任务块(涉及在 2 个任务之间不可预测地切换)。参与者根据二维刺激在二维网格中的空间位置,通过图片或颜色对其进行分类。反应时间显示出与年龄相关的表现呈倒 U 形。与转换相比,这些年龄差异在目标设定方面更为明显,从而将在主动控制情况下获得的结果推广到这种新的需要反应性控制的情境中。此外,还得到了口头表达的与年龄相关的差异的影响。口头表达对年轻人不利,对老年人有益,对儿童则有混合影响。这些差异是根据反应性目标设定策略的定性发展变化来解释的。