Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.029. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Radical cystectomy (RC) is a morbid procedure associated with high costs. Limited population-based data exist on the complication profile and costs of robot-assisted RC (RARC) compared with open RC (ORC).
To evaluate morbidity and cost differences between ORC and RARC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent RC at 279 hospitals across the United States between 2004 and 2010.
Multivariable logistic and median regression was performed to evaluate 90-d mortality, postoperative complications (Clavien classification), readmission rates, length of stay (LOS), and direct costs. To reduce selection bias, we used propensity weighting with survey weighting to obtain nationally representative estimates.
The final weighted cohort included 34 672 ORC and 2101 RARC patients. RARC use increased from 0.6% in 2004 to 12.8% in 2010. Major complication rates (Clavien grade ≥ 3; 17.0% vs 19.8%, p = 0.2) were similar between ORC and RARC (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32; p = 0.42). RARC had 46% decreased odds of minor complications (Clavien grade 1-2; OR: 0.54; p = 0.03). RARC had $4326 higher adjusted 90-d median direct costs (p = 0.004). Although RARC had a significantly shorter LOS (11.8 d vs 10.2 d; p = 0.008), no significant differences in room and board costs existed (p = 0.20). Supply costs for RARC were significantly higher ($6041 vs $3638; p < 0.0001). Morbidity and cost differences were not present among the highest-volume surgeons (≥ 7 cases per year) and hospitals (≥ 19 cases per year). Limitations include use of an administrative database and lack of oncologic characteristics.
The use of RARC has increased between 2004 and 2010. Compared with ORC, RARC was associated with decreased odds of minor but not major complications and with increased expenditures attributed primarily to higher supply costs. Centralization of ORC and RARC to high-volume providers may minimize these morbidity and cost differences.
Using a US population-based cohort, we found that robotic surgery for bladder cancer decreased minor complications, had no impact on major complications and was more costly than open surgery.
根治性膀胱切除术(RC)是一种高发病率的手术,费用昂贵。与开放 RC(ORC)相比,机器人辅助 RC(RARC)的并发症谱和成本方面的有限人群数据尚不存在。
评估 ORC 和 RARC 之间的发病率和成本差异。
设计、设置和参与者:我们对美国 279 家医院 2004 年至 2010 年间接受 RC 的患者进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
多变量逻辑回归和中位数回归用于评估 90 天死亡率、术后并发症(Clavien 分类)、再入院率、住院时间(LOS)和直接成本。为了减少选择偏差,我们使用倾向评分和调查权重来获得具有全国代表性的估计值。
最终加权队列包括 34672 例 ORC 和 2101 例 RARC 患者。RARC 的使用率从 2004 年的 0.6%增加到 2010 年的 12.8%。ORC 和 RARC 的主要并发症发生率(Clavien 分级≥3;17.0% vs 19.8%,p=0.2)相似(比值比[OR]:1.32;p=0.42)。RARC 发生轻度并发症的几率降低了 46%(Clavien 分级 1-2;OR:0.54;p=0.03)。RARC 的调整后 90 天中位数直接成本高 4326 美元(p=0.004)。尽管 RARC 的 LOS 明显缩短(11.8d 比 10.2d;p=0.008),但房间和董事会费用没有显著差异(p=0.20)。RARC 的供应成本明显更高($6041 比 $3638;p<0.0001)。在最高手术量的外科医生(≥7 例/年)和医院(≥19 例/年)中,发病率和成本差异并不存在。局限性包括使用行政数据库和缺乏肿瘤特征。
2004 年至 2010 年间,RARC 的使用有所增加。与 ORC 相比,RARC 与较低的轻度并发症几率相关,但与主要并发症无关,且与主要归因于更高供应成本的更高支出相关。将 ORC 和 RARC 集中到高手术量的提供者手中可能会最小化这些发病率和成本差异。
使用美国人群队列,我们发现膀胱癌的机器人手术降低了轻度并发症的几率,对重度并发症没有影响,而且比开放性手术更昂贵。