• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因难治性腹膜炎拔除导管后重新开始腹膜透析

Reinitiation of peritoneal dialysis after catheter removal for refractory peritonitis.

作者信息

Ram R, Swarnalatha G, Dakshinamurty K V

机构信息

Nizam's Insitute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, AP, India,

出版信息

J Nephrol. 2014 Aug;27(4):445-9. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0048-1. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1007/s40620-014-0048-1
PMID:24493391
Abstract

AIM

A high proportion of patients whose catheters are removed are unable to successfully reinitiate peritoneal dialysis (PD) due to irreversible peritoneal injury or to decisions made by the patient or the nephrologist for different and often empiric reasons. The present study examined the outcomes of patients reinitiated on PD after peritonitis.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with end-stage renal disease who were initiated on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis at our Institute in south India between 1998 and 2012, identifying those in whom the catheter was removed and the cases where PD was reinitiated, analysing the reasons and outcome. We compared data of patients who could be reinitiated on PD with those who could not be reinitiated and also data of patients who successfully continued PD after reinitiation with those who suffered technique failure.

RESULTS

Peritoneal dialysis was reinitiated in 31 (19.4%) of 159 patients whose catheter was removed owing to refractory peritonitis, including after an episode of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungal peritonitis. Some patients had the catheter placed for a third time. No significant difference was found between patients who reinitiated PD vs. did not, or between those who were successful in reinitiating PD vs. unsuccessful.

CONCLUSION

Notwithstanding the small cohort size, the present study demonstrates that reinitiating PD is feasible in a developing country, and also that reinitiation of PD is possible after an episode of P. aeruginosa and fungal peritonitis. However, future studies in a larger patient cohort and assessing dialysis adequacy are required to confirm and extend our findings.

摘要

目的

很大一部分导管被拔除的患者由于不可逆转的腹膜损伤,或由于患者或肾病科医生出于不同且通常是经验性的原因所做的决定,而无法成功重新开始腹膜透析(PD)。本研究调查了腹膜炎后重新开始PD的患者的结局。

方法

我们回顾了1998年至2012年期间在印度南部我们研究所开始接受持续性非卧床腹膜透析的所有终末期肾病患者,确定那些导管被拔除的患者以及重新开始PD的病例,分析原因和结局。我们将能够重新开始PD的患者的数据与无法重新开始的患者的数据进行了比较,并且还将重新开始后成功继续PD的患者的数据与那些遭受技术失败的患者的数据进行了比较。

结果

159例因难治性腹膜炎而拔除导管的患者中有31例(19.4%)重新开始了腹膜透析,包括在发生铜绿假单胞菌和真菌性腹膜炎之后。一些患者第三次置入了导管。重新开始PD的患者与未重新开始的患者之间,以及成功重新开始PD的患者与未成功的患者之间均未发现显著差异。

结论

尽管队列规模较小,但本研究表明在发展中国家重新开始PD是可行的,并且在发生铜绿假单胞菌和真菌性腹膜炎之后重新开始PD也是可能的。然而,需要在更大的患者队列中进行进一步研究并评估透析充分性,以证实和扩展我们的发现。

相似文献

1
Reinitiation of peritoneal dialysis after catheter removal for refractory peritonitis.因难治性腹膜炎拔除导管后重新开始腹膜透析
J Nephrol. 2014 Aug;27(4):445-9. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0048-1. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
2
A Retrospective Analysis of Etiology and Outcomes of Refractory CAPD Peritonitis in a Tertiary Care Center from North India.印度北部一家三级医疗中心难治性持续性非卧床腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的病因及转归回顾性分析
Perit Dial Int. 2018 Nov-Dec;38(6):441-446. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00145. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Outcomes of peritoneal dialysis catheter reinsertion: does the cause of initial removal matter?腹膜透析导管重新插入的结果:初次拔除的原因重要吗?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 May;46(5):1013-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0558-0. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
4
The culture from peritoneal dialysis catheter enhances yield of microorganism identification in peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis.腹腔透析导管的培养可提高腹腔透析相关性腹膜炎中微生物鉴定的阳性率。
Perit Dial Int. 2020 Jan;40(1):93-95. doi: 10.1177/0896860819878387.
5
Persistent sterile peritoneal inflammation after catheter removal for refractory bacterial peritonitis predicts full-blown encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.导管移除后持续无菌性腹膜炎症预示着难治性细菌性腹膜炎会发展为完全型包裹性腹膜硬化症。
Perit Dial Int. 2013 Sep-Oct;33(5):507-14. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00281. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
Simultaneous removal and replacement of the peritoneal catheter in CAPD patient with refractory peritonitis sustained by P. aeruginosa: A case-report.铜绿假单胞菌相关性腹膜炎患者经腹腔置管引流后行腹腔置管更换术 1 例报告
J Vasc Access. 2024 Jul;25(4):1341-1344. doi: 10.1177/11297298231178061. Epub 2023 May 30.
7
Determinants of catheter loss following continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis.持续性非卧床腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎后导管丢失的决定因素。
Perit Dial Int. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):361-70.
8
Characteristics and outcomes of fungal peritonitis in a modern North American cohort.现代北美队列中真菌性腹膜炎的特征与结局
Perit Dial Int. 2015 Jan-Feb;35(1):78-84. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00179. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
9
Risk Factors for and Outcomes of Catheter-Associated Peritonitis in Children: The SCOPE Collaborative.儿童导管相关腹膜炎的危险因素及结局:SCOPE协作研究
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Sep 7;11(9):1590-1596. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02540316. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Frequency and prognosis of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis in children.儿童腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的频率和预后。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2024 Jul;28(7):692-700. doi: 10.1007/s10157-024-02482-x. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review on Treatment and Outcomes of Tuberculous Peritonitis in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.腹膜透析患者结核性腹膜炎治疗及结局的系统评价
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Nov 19;9(2):277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.11.012. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis: Suggestions for Management and Mistakes to Avoid.腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎:管理建议及避免的错误
Kidney Med. 2020 Jul 3;2(4):467-475. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.04.010. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
3
Resuming peritoneal dialysis after catheter removal due to complicated peritonitis.

本文引用的文献

1
An Indian model for cost-effective CAPD with minimal man power and economic resources.一种利用最少人力和经济资源实现具有成本效益的持续性非卧床腹膜透析的印度模式。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Oct;26(10):3089-91. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr353. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
2
Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update.腹膜透析相关感染的建议:2010年更新版
Perit Dial Int. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):393-423. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2010.00049.
3
Peritoneal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of adhesions.腹膜闪烁扫描术在粘连诊断中的应用
因腹膜炎复杂而拔管后恢复腹膜透析。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020 Apr;24(4):349-355. doi: 10.1007/s10157-019-01833-3. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
4
Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2016 update. What is new?腹膜透析相关感染的建议:2016年更新版。有哪些新内容?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Dec;49(12):2177-2184. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1632-9. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
5
ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.国际腹膜透析学会腹膜炎推荐意见:2016年预防与治疗更新版
Perit Dial Int. 2016 Sep 10;36(5):481-508. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00078. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
Perit Dial Int. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):112-3. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00041.
4
Peritoneal catheter removal for severe peritonitis: landscape after a lost battle.因严重腹膜炎拔除腹膜导管:一场败仗后的局面。
Perit Dial Int. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):155-8.
5
Predictors of survival and technique success after reinsertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter following severe peritonitis.重症腹膜炎后腹膜透析导管重新置入术后生存及技术成功的预测因素
Perit Dial Int. 2007 Jan-Feb;27(1):67-73.
6
Outcome of patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis undergoing peritoneal catheter removal because of peritonitis.因腹膜炎而拔除腹膜导管的慢性腹膜透析患者的结局
Adv Perit Dial. 2005;21:98-101.
7
Peritonitis-related mortality in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis.接受慢性腹膜透析患者的腹膜炎相关死亡率。
Perit Dial Int. 2005 May-Jun;25(3):274-84.
8
Is it safe to simultaneously remove and replace infected peritoneal dialysis catheters? Review of the literature and suggested guidelines.同时移除和更换感染的腹膜透析导管是否安全?文献综述及建议指南。
Adv Perit Dial. 2003;19:255-9.
9
Analysis of factors predicting survival of a second peritoneal dialysis catheter.预测第二条腹膜透析导管存活情况的因素分析
Adv Perit Dial. 2003;19:252-4.
10
Peritoneal dialysis catheter removal for acute peritonitis: a retrospective analysis of factors associated with catheter removal and prolonged postoperative hospitalization.急性腹膜炎患者腹膜透析导管拔除术:与导管拔除及术后住院时间延长相关因素的回顾性分析
Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Jan;43(1):103-11. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.08.046.