• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 CombiRx 研究的结果,来评价醋酸格拉替雷和干扰素 β-1a 治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, based on the CombiRx study.

机构信息

Universitat de Barcelona , Barcelona , Spain.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2014 Mar;17(3):215-22. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.890936.

DOI:10.3111/13696998.2014.890936
PMID:24494728
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the cost-effectiveness of the Disease Modifying Treatments (DMT), Glatiramer Acetate (GA) and Interferon beta-1a (IFN) in monotherapy alone and in combination for the prevention of relapses among Spanish patients aged between 18-60 years old with established Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to represent the transition of a cohort of patients over a 10 year period using the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service (NHS). The model considered five different health states with 1-year cycles including without relapse, patients with suspect, non-protocol defined and protocol defined exacerbations, as well as a category information lost. Efficacy data was obtained from the 3-year CombiRx Study. Costs were reported in 2013 Euros and a 3% discount rate was applied for health and benefits. Deterministic results were presented as the annual treatment cost for the number of relapses. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

Deterministic results showed that the expected annual cost per patient was lower when treated with GA (€13,843) compared with IFN (€15,589) and the combined treatment with IFN+GA (€21,539). The annual number of relapses were lower in the GA cohort with 3.81 vs 4.18 in the IFN cohort and 4.08 in the cohort treated with IFN+GA. Results from probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that GA has a higher probability of being cost-effective than treatment with IFN or IFN+GA for threshold values from €28,000 onwards, independent of the maximum that the Spanish NHS is willing to pay for avoiding relapses.

CONCLUSION

GA was shown to be a cost-effective treatment option for the prevention of relapses in Spanish patients diagnosed with RRMS. When GA in monotherapy is compared with INF in monotherapy and IFN+GA combined, it may be concluded that the first is the dominant strategy.

摘要

背景

评估疾病修正治疗(DMT),醋酸格拉替雷(GA)和干扰素β-1a(IFN)单独和联合用于预防已确诊的复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的 18-60 岁西班牙患者复发的成本效益。

方法

使用西班牙国家卫生服务(NHS)的观点,开发了一个马尔可夫模型来代表患者队列在 10 年内的过渡。该模型考虑了五种不同的健康状态,每个状态有 1 年的周期,包括无复发、疑似、非方案定义和方案定义的恶化,以及信息丢失类别。疗效数据来自 3 年的 CombiRx 研究。成本以 2013 年欧元报告,并对健康和收益应用了 3%的贴现率。确定性结果以每例患者的复发年治疗成本表示。进行了概率敏感性分析以测试模型的稳健性。

结果

确定性结果表明,与 IFN(€15589)和 IFN+GA(€21539)联合治疗相比,GA(€13843)治疗的患者预期年度人均成本较低。GA 队列的年复发次数较低,为 3.81 次,IFN 队列为 4.18 次,IFN+GA 队列为 4.08 次。概率敏感性分析结果表明,对于从€28000 起的阈值值,GA 比 IFN 或 IFN+GA 更有可能具有成本效益,这与西班牙 NHS 愿意为避免复发而支付的最高金额无关。

结论

GA 被证明是预防西班牙 RRMS 患者复发的一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。当 GA 单药治疗与 IFN 单药治疗和 IFN+GA 联合治疗相比时,可以得出结论,第一种是主导策略。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, based on the CombiRx study.基于 CombiRx 研究的结果,来评价醋酸格拉替雷和干扰素 β-1a 治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2014 Mar;17(3):215-22. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.890936.
2
Cost-effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.在美国,芬戈莫德与干扰素β-1a 治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1088-96. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.693553. Epub 2012 May 24.
3
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较疾病修饰药物用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的成本效益。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Sep;15(7):543-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.7.543.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of disease modifiying drugs (interferons and glatiramer acetate) as first line treatments in remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.疾病修饰药物(干扰素和格拉替雷)作为缓解复发型多发性硬化症患者一线治疗的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):424-33. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.654868. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of peginterferon beta-1a compared with interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.在美国,用聚乙二醇干扰素β-1a 与干扰素β-1a 和那他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2016 Jul;19(7):684-95. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1157080. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Peginterferon Beta-1a and Alemtuzumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.聚乙二醇干扰素 β-1a 和阿仑单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jun;23(6):666-676. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.6.666.
7
[Budget impact analysis of the first-line treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in Spain].[西班牙复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的预算影响分析]
Rev Neurol. 2011 Aug 1;53(3):129-38.
8
Peginterferon beta-1a versus other self-injectable disease-modifying therapies in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Scotland: a cost-effectiveness analysis.聚乙二醇化干扰素β-1a与其他自我注射疾病修正疗法治疗苏格兰复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2017 Mar;20(3):228-238. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1247712. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
A health-economic evaluation of disease-modifying drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from the German societal perspective.从德国社会角度评估治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疾病修正药物的卫生经济学价值。
Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):717-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.019.
10
Cost of care according to disease-modifying therapy in Mexicans with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.根据疾病修正疗法,对墨西哥复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者进行的治疗费用评估。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2013 Dec;113(4):415-20. doi: 10.1007/s13760-013-0200-z. Epub 2013 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.复发型多发性硬化症的经济学评估如何随时间演变?一项系统文献综述。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):557-583. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
2
Modeling Approaches in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.疾病修正治疗缓解复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析中的建模方法:更新的系统评价和对未来经济评估的建议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Oct;36(10):1223-1252. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0683-9.
3
Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies.
多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗:成本效益研究的系统文献回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):189-204. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0577-2.
4
Cost analysis of glatiramer acetate versus interferon-β for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in patients with spasticity: the Escala study.伴有痉挛的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者用醋酸格拉替雷与干扰素-β治疗的成本分析:Escala 研究。
Health Econ Rev. 2015 Dec;5(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0066-2. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Modeling in Multiple Sclerosis: Playing Around with Non-Healthcare Costs?多发性硬化症的成本效益建模:是否要考虑非医疗保健成本?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Dec;33(12):1241-4. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0322-7.