• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[西班牙复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的预算影响分析]

[Budget impact analysis of the first-line treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in Spain].

作者信息

Sánchez-De la Rosa R, Sabater E, Casado M A

机构信息

Departamento Médico, Teva Pharma SLU, Alcobendas, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Rev Neurol. 2011 Aug 1;53(3):129-38.

PMID:21748710
Abstract

AIM

To assess the budget impact of the treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), interferons, and glatiramer acetate, from the National Health System perspective in Spain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A budget impact model was designed to compare the cost of RRMS treatment in different settings, using a five year time-horizon, considering different percentages of administration of each medication. A reference setting o base case using all the available first line treatments (interferons and glatiramer acetate) was compared with five alternatives scenarios excluding each one of these treatments. The cost analysis (euros, year 2010) includes direct medical resources (drugs, administration, visits, disease management, diagnostic tests). Unitary cost data was obtained from the health costs database e-Salud and drugs catalogue.

RESULTS

Considering a cohort of 22 255 patients with RRMS, the mean global budget impact per year would be 260 775 470 euros in the base case. The setting that excluded glatiramer acetate increases the budget impact in a 3.23% (372 euros per patient per year). Pharmacological costs were the key drivers of total cost (90%).

CONCLUSION

The use of glatiramer acetate in the first-line-treatment of RRMS patients is a cost-saving strategy, which may decrease the budget impact from the National Health System perspective in Spain.

摘要

目的

从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度评估复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)治疗药物干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷的预算影响。

患者与方法

设计了一个预算影响模型,以五年时间跨度比较不同情况下RRMS治疗的成本,考虑每种药物不同的给药百分比。将使用所有可用一线治疗(干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷)的参考情况或基础病例与排除这些治疗中每一种的五个替代方案进行比较。成本分析(2010年欧元)包括直接医疗资源(药物、给药、就诊、疾病管理、诊断测试)。单位成本数据来自卫生成本数据库e-Salud和药品目录。

结果

考虑到22255名RRMS患者队列,基础病例中每年的平均总体预算影响为260775470欧元。排除醋酸格拉替雷的情况使预算影响增加3.23%(每位患者每年372欧元)。药物成本是总成本的主要驱动因素(90%)。

结论

在RRMS患者的一线治疗中使用醋酸格拉替雷是一种节省成本的策略,从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度来看,这可能会降低预算影响。

相似文献

1
[Budget impact analysis of the first-line treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in Spain].[西班牙复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的预算影响分析]
Rev Neurol. 2011 Aug 1;53(3):129-38.
2
[Cost-utility analisys of multiple sclerosis treatment with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta in Spain].[西班牙醋酸格拉替雷或β-干扰素治疗多发性硬化症的成本效用分析]
Farm Hosp. 2003 May-Jun;27(3):159-65.
3
A health-economic evaluation of disease-modifying drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from the German societal perspective.从德国社会角度评估治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疾病修正药物的卫生经济学价值。
Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):717-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.019.
4
Cost-effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, based on the CombiRx study.基于 CombiRx 研究的结果,来评价醋酸格拉替雷和干扰素 β-1a 治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2014 Mar;17(3):215-22. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.890936.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of disease modifiying drugs (interferons and glatiramer acetate) as first line treatments in remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.疾病修饰药物(干扰素和格拉替雷)作为缓解复发型多发性硬化症患者一线治疗的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):424-33. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.654868. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
6
Cost effectiveness and budget impact of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.那他珠单抗治疗复发型多发性硬化症的成本效果及预算影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jun;25(6):1445-54. doi: 10.1185/03007990902876040.
7
Benefits of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.醋酸格拉替雷治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的益处。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009 Jun;9(3):205-14. doi: 10.1586/erp.09.20.
8
Cost of care according to disease-modifying therapy in Mexicans with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.根据疾病修正疗法,对墨西哥复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者进行的治疗费用评估。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2013 Dec;113(4):415-20. doi: 10.1007/s13760-013-0200-z. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Cost-effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.在美国,芬戈莫德与干扰素β-1a 治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1088-96. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.693553. Epub 2012 May 24.
10
[The efficiency and cost-utility ratio of interferon beta in the treatment of multiple sclerosis in Andalusia].[安达卢西亚地区干扰素β治疗多发性硬化症的疗效及成本效益比]
Rev Neurol. 2004;39(1):1-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost analysis of glatiramer acetate versus interferon-β for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in patients with spasticity: the Escala study.伴有痉挛的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者用醋酸格拉替雷与干扰素-β治疗的成本分析:Escala 研究。
Health Econ Rev. 2015 Dec;5(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0066-2. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
2
Clinical utility of glatiramer acetate in the management of relapse frequency in multiple sclerosis.醋酸格拉替雷在控制多发性硬化症复发频率方面的临床效用。
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2012 Aug 29;4:117-33. doi: 10.4137/JCNSD.S8755. Print 2012.
3
Cost analysis of glatiramer acetate vs. fingolimod for the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Spain.
在西班牙,用醋酸格拉替雷与芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本分析。
Health Econ Rev. 2013 May 7;3:13. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-13. eCollection 2013.
4
Modelling the cost effectiveness of disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: issues to consider.模拟多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗的成本效益:需要考虑的问题。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jun;31(6):455-69. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0063-4.
5
Cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: a systematic review of the literature.多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法的成本效益:文献系统评价
Autoimmune Dis. 2012;2012:784364. doi: 10.1155/2012/784364. Epub 2012 Dec 6.