Killawi Amal, Khidir Amal, Elnashar Maha, Abdelrahim Huda, Hammoud Maya, Elliott Heather, Thurston Michelle, Asad Humna, Al-Khal Abdul Latif, Fetters Michael D
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Feb 4;15:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-9.
Very few researchers have reported on procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating participants in health research in the Arabian Gulf Region. Empirical research can inform the debate about whether to adjust these procedures for culturally diverse settings. Our objective was to delineate procedures related to recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating health research participants in the extremely high-density multicultural setting of Qatar.
During a multistage mixed methods project, field observations and qualitative interviews were conducted in a general medicine clinic of a major medical center in Qatar. Participants were chosen based on gender, age, literacy, and preferred language, i.e., Arabic, English, Hindi and Urdu. Qualitative analysis identified themes about recruitment, informed consent, compensation, and other research procedures.
A total of 153 individuals were approached and 84 enrolled; the latter showed a diverse age range (18 to 75 years); varied language representation: Arabic (n = 24), English (n = 20), Hindi (n = 20), and Urdu (n = 20); and balanced gender distribution: women (n = 43) and men (n = 41). Primary reasons for 30 declinations included concern about interview length and recording. The study achieved a 74% participation rate. Qualitative analytics revealed key themes about hesitation to participate, decisions about participation with family members as well as discussions with them as "incidental research participants", the informed consent process, privacy and gender rules of the interview environment, reactions to member checking and compensation, and motivation for participating. Vulnerability emerged as a recurring issue throughout the process among a minority of participants.
This study from Qatar is the first to provide empirical data on recruitment, informed consent, compensation and other research procedures in a general adult population in the Middle East and Arabian Gulf. This investigation illustrates how potential research participants perceive research participation. Fundamentally, Western ethical research principles were applicable, but required flexibility and culturally informed adaptations.
在阿拉伯海湾地区,很少有研究人员报道健康研究中招募参与者、获取知情同意及给予补偿的相关程序。实证研究可为是否针对文化多元环境调整这些程序的辩论提供依据。我们的目标是描绘在卡塔尔人口密度极高的多元文化环境中招募健康研究参与者、获取知情同意及给予补偿的相关程序。
在一个多阶段混合方法项目中,对卡塔尔一家主要医疗中心的普通内科诊所进行了实地观察和定性访谈。根据性别、年龄、识字率和首选语言(即阿拉伯语、英语、印地语和乌尔都语)选择参与者。定性分析确定了有关招募、知情同意、补偿及其他研究程序的主题。
共接触了153人,84人登记参与;后者年龄范围多样(18至75岁);语言代表性各异:阿拉伯语(n = 24)、英语(n = 20)、印地语(n = 20)和乌尔都语(n = 20);性别分布均衡:女性(n = 43)和男性(n = 41)。30人拒绝参与的主要原因包括担心访谈时长和录音。该研究的参与率为74%。定性分析揭示了关于参与的犹豫、与家庭成员共同决定参与以及将他们作为“附带研究参与者”进行讨论、知情同意过程、访谈环境的隐私和性别规则、对成员核对和补偿的反应以及参与动机等关键主题。在少数参与者中,易受伤害性在整个过程中反复出现。
这项来自卡塔尔的研究首次提供了中东和阿拉伯海湾地区普通成年人群中招募、知情同意、补偿及其他研究程序的实证数据。该调查说明了潜在研究参与者对参与研究的看法。从根本上讲,西方伦理研究原则是适用的,但需要灵活性和基于文化的调整。