Suppr超能文献

帕金森病伴轻度认知障碍和痴呆患者的认知特征分析。

Cognitive profiling of Parkinson disease patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

机构信息

"Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo" - I.R.C.C.S., Parkinson Unit, Venice, Italy.

"Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo" - I.R.C.C.S., Parkinson Unit, Venice, Italy.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Apr;20(4):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Parkinson disease (PD) is variable because different classification criteria are applied and there is lack of consensus about neuropsychological tests and cut-off used for cognitive profiling. Given the important therapeutic consequences for patient management, we aimed at identifying suitable diagnostic cognitive tests and respective screening cut-off values for MCI and dementia in PD (PDD).

METHODS

We evaluated 105 PD patients using an extensive neuropsychological battery categorized as PD without cognitive impairment (PD-CNT) (35%), PD-MCI (47%) and PDD (18%) based on established criteria and calculated Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

We found different sensitivity and specificity among neuropsychological tests in detecting PD-MCI and PDD. In particular performance in attention/set shifting, verbal memory and language abilities, discriminated both PD-MCI and PDD from PD-CNT. Abilities involved mainly in semantic retrieval mechanisms discriminated PD-CNT from PD-MCI but also PD-MCI from PDD. Finally deficits in executive and visual-spatial abilities were only affected in PDD.

CONCLUSION

Our data point to an independent and different load of each test in defining different PD cognitive statuses. These findings can help selection of appropriate cognitive batteries in longitudinal studies and definition of stage-specific therapeutic targets.

摘要

背景

帕金森病(PD)患者轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆的患病率因应用不同的分类标准以及对认知评估使用的神经心理学测试和临界值缺乏共识而存在差异。鉴于对患者管理具有重要的治疗意义,我们旨在为 PD(PDD)患者确定合适的诊断性认知测试和相应的 MCI 和痴呆筛查临界值。

方法

我们使用广泛的神经心理学测试对 105 名 PD 患者进行了评估,根据既定标准将其分为无认知障碍的 PD(PD-CNT)(35%)、PD-MCI(47%)和 PDD(18%)。我们计算了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

我们发现不同的神经心理学测试在检测 PD-MCI 和 PDD 时具有不同的敏感性和特异性。特别是在注意力/转换、言语记忆和语言能力方面的表现,可将 PD-MCI 和 PDD 与 PD-CNT 区分开来。主要涉及语义检索机制的能力可将 PD-CNT 与 PD-MCI 区分开来,也可将 PD-MCI 与 PDD 区分开来。最后,执行能力和视觉空间能力的缺陷仅在 PDD 中受到影响。

结论

我们的数据表明,每个测试在定义不同的 PD 认知状态方面具有独立且不同的作用。这些发现有助于在纵向研究中选择合适的认知测试组合,并确定特定阶段的治疗目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验