Haematologica. 2014 Feb;99(2):232-42. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.099358.
Multiple myeloma management has undergone profound changes in the past thanks to advances in our understanding of the disease biology and improvements in treatment and supportive care approaches. This article presents recommendations of the European Myeloma Network for newly diagnosed patients based on the GRADE system for level of evidence. All patients with symptomatic disease should undergo risk stratification to classify patients for International Staging System stage (level of evidence: 1A) and for cytogenetically defined high- versus standard-risk groups (2B). Novel-agent-based induction and up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in medically fit patients remains the standard of care (1A). Induction therapy should include a triple combination of bortezomib, with either adriamycin or thalidomide and dexamethasone (1A), or with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (2B). Currently, allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be considered for young patients with high-risk disease and preferably in the context of a clinical trial (2B). Thalidomide (1B) or lenalidomide (1A) maintenance increases progression-free survival and possibly overall survival (2B). Bortezomib-based regimens are a valuable consolidation option, especially for patients who failed excellent response after autologous stem cell transplantation (2A). Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone or melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide are the standards of care for transplant-ineligible patients (1A). Melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide with lenalidomide maintenance increases progression-free survival, but overall survival data are needed. New data from the phase III study (MM-020/IFM 07-01) of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone reached its primary end point of a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival as compared to melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide and provides further evidence for the efficacy of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients (2B).
由于对疾病生物学的认识不断提高以及治疗和支持性护理方法的改进,过去多发性骨髓瘤的治疗发生了重大变化。本文根据证据水平的 GRADE 系统,为新诊断的患者提出了欧洲骨髓瘤网络的建议。所有有症状疾病的患者都应进行风险分层,以对国际分期系统(ISS)进行分期(证据水平:1A)和对细胞遗传学定义的高危与标准风险组进行分类(2B)。新型药物为基础的诱导和适合医学的患者的一线自体干细胞移植仍然是标准治疗方法(1A)。诱导治疗应包括硼替佐米联合阿霉素或沙利度胺和地塞米松(1A),或联合环磷酰胺和地塞米松(2B)的三联组合。目前,同种异体干细胞移植可能被认为是高危疾病的年轻患者的选择,并且最好在临床试验的背景下进行(2B)。沙利度胺(1B)或来那度胺(1A)维持治疗可提高无进展生存期,并可能提高总生存期(2B)。硼替佐米为基础的方案是一种有价值的巩固选择,特别是对于自体干细胞移植后反应良好的患者(2A)。硼替佐米-美法仑-泼尼松或美法仑-泼尼松-沙利度胺是不适合移植患者的标准治疗方法(1A)。来那度胺-泼尼松-沙利度胺联合来那度胺维持治疗可提高无进展生存期,但需要总生存期数据。来自 III 期研究(MM-020/IFM 07-01)的新数据表明,来那度胺-低剂量地塞米松在无进展生存期方面显著优于美法仑-泼尼松-沙利度胺,进一步证明了来那度胺-低剂量地塞米松在不适合移植患者中的疗效(2B)。
Front Oncol. 2024-3-18
Sci Rep. 2024-2-21
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2023-6-16
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2023-7
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014-4
Leukemia. 2013-8-26
Blood. 2013-8-22
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015-6
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013-8-6
N Engl J Med. 2013-8-1
Internist (Berl). 2013-8
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013-6-7