Durie Brian G M, Hoering Antje, Abidi Muneer H, Rajkumar S Vincent, Epstein Joshua, Kahanic Stephen P, Thakuri Mohan, Reu Frederic, Reynolds Christopher M, Sexton Rachael, Orlowski Robert Z, Barlogie Bart, Dispenzieri Angela
Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):519-527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31594-X. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is a reference treatment for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. The combination of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy in the setting of newly diagnosed myeloma. We aimed to study whether the addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone would improve progression-free survival and provide better response rates in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who were not planned for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant.
In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma aged 18 years and older from participating Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) and National Clinical Trial Network (NCTN) institutions (both inpatient and outpatient settings). Key inclusion criteria were presence of CRAB (C=calcium elevation; R=renal impairment; A=anaemia; B=bone involvement) criteria with measurable disease (measured by assessment of free light chains), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3, haemoglobin concentration 9 g/dL or higher, absolute neutrophil count 1 × 10 cells per mm or higher, and a platelet count of 80 000/mm or higher. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to receive either an initial treatment of bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd group). Randomisation was stratified based on International Staging System stage (I, II, or III) and intent to transplant (yes vs no). The VRd regimen was given as eight 21-day cycles. Bortezomib was given at 1·3 mg/m intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, combined with oral lenalidomide 25 mg daily on days 1-14 plus oral dexamethasone 20 mg daily on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12. The Rd regimen was given as six 28-day cycles. The standard Rd regimen consisted of 25 mg oral lenalidomide once a day for days 1-21 plus 40 mg oral dexamethasone once a day on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival using a prespecified one-sided stratified log rank test at a significance level of 0·02. Analyses were intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00644228.
Between April, 2008, and February, 2012, we randomly assigned 525 patients at 139 participating institutions (264 to VRd and 261 to Rd). In the randomly assigned patients, 21 patients in the VRd group and 31 in the Rd group were deemed ineligible based mainly on missing, insufficient, or early or late baseline laboratory data. Median progression-free survival was significantly improved in the VRd group (43 months vs 30 months in the Rd group; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·712, 96% CI 0·56-0·906; one-sided p value 0·0018). The median overall survival was also significantly improved in the VRd group (75 months vs 64 months in the Rd group, HR 0·709, 95% CI 0·524-0·959; two-sided p value 0·025). The rates of overall response (partial response or better) were 82% (176/216) in the VRd group and 72% (153/214) in the Rd group, and 16% (34/216) and 8% (18/214) of patients who were assessable for response in these respective groups had a complete response or better. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 198 (82%) of 241 patients in the VRd group and 169 (75%) of 226 patients in the Rd group; 55 (23%) and 22 (10%) patients discontinued induction treatment because of adverse events, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths in the Rd group, and two in the VRd group.
In patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, the addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone resulted in significantly improved progression-free and overall survival and had an acceptable risk-benefit profile.
NIH, NCI, NCTN, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Oncology Company, and Celgene Corporation.
来那度胺联合地塞米松是新诊断骨髓瘤患者的标准治疗方案。蛋白酶体抑制剂硼替佐米联合来那度胺和地塞米松在新诊断骨髓瘤患者中已显示出显著疗效。我们旨在研究在来那度胺和地塞米松基础上加用硼替佐米是否能改善未计划立即进行自体干细胞移植的初治多发性骨髓瘤患者的无进展生存期,并提高缓解率。
在这项随机、开放标签的3期试验中,我们从参与研究的西南肿瘤协作组(SWOG)和国家临床试验网络(NCTN)机构(包括住院和门诊)招募18岁及以上新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者。关键纳入标准为符合CRAB(C = 血钙升高;R = 肾功能损害;A = 贫血;B = 骨损害)标准且疾病可测量(通过游离轻链评估)、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为0 - 3、血红蛋白浓度≥9 g/dL、绝对中性粒细胞计数≥1×10⁹细胞/mm³、血小板计数≥80000/mm³。我们将患者按1:1随机分配,分别接受硼替佐米联合来那度胺和地塞米松的初始治疗(VRd组)或单独使用来那度胺和地塞米松(Rd组)。随机分组根据国际分期系统分期(I、II或III期)和移植意向(是与否)进行分层。VRd方案为8个21天周期。硼替佐米在第1、4、8和11天静脉注射,剂量为1.3 mg/m²,联合口服来那度胺25 mg,每日1次,第1 - 14天服用,以及口服地塞米松20 mg,每日1次,在第1、2、4、5、8、9、11和12天服用。Rd方案为6个28天周期。标准Rd方案包括口服来那度胺25 mg,每日1次,第1 - 21天服用,以及口服地塞米松40 mg,每日1次,在第1、8、15和22天服用。主要终点是使用预先设定的单侧分层对数秩检验评估的无进展生存期,显著性水平为0.02。分析采用意向性治疗。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT00644228。
在2008年4月至2012年2月期间,我们在139个参与机构随机分配了525例患者(264例至VRd组,261例至Rd组)。在随机分配的患者中,VRd组有21例和Rd组有31例主要因基线实验室数据缺失、不足或过早或过晚而被判定为不符合纳入标准。VRd组的中位无进展生存期显著延长(43个月 vs Rd组的30个月;分层风险比[HR]为0.712,96%CI为0.56 - 0.906;单侧p值为0.0018)。VRd组的中位总生存期也显著延长(75个月 vs Rd组的64个月,HR为0.709,95%CI为0.524 - 0.959;双侧p值为0.025)。VRd组的总缓解率(部分缓解或更好)为82%(176/216),Rd组为72%(153/214),在这些可评估缓解的组中,分别有16%(34/216)和8%(18/214)的患者获得完全缓解或更好的缓解。VRd组241例患者中有198例(82%)报告了3级或更高等级的不良事件,Rd组226例患者中有169例(75%);分别有55例(23%)和22例(10%)患者因不良事件而停止诱导治疗。Rd组无治疗相关死亡,VRd组有2例。
在新诊断的骨髓瘤患者中,在来那度胺和地塞米松基础上加用硼替佐米可显著改善无进展生存期和总生存期,且风险效益比可接受。
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)、美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)、国家临床试验网络(NCTN)、千年制药公司、武田肿瘤公司和新基公司。