Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St.Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Health, Nutrition and Management, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 31;9(1):e87579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087579. eCollection 2014.
The main aim of this study was to assess whether a history of abuse, reported during pregnancy, was associated with an operative delivery. Secondly, we assessed if the association varied according to the type of abuse and if the reported abuse had been experienced as a child or an adult.
The Bidens study, a cohort study in six European countries (Belgium, Iceland, Denmark, Estonia, Norway, and Sweden) recruited 6724 pregnant women attending routine antenatal care. History of abuse was assessed through questionnaire and linked to obstetric information from hospital records. The main outcome measure was operative delivery as a dichotomous variable, and categorized as an elective caesarean section (CS), or an operative vaginal birth, or an emergency CS. Non-obstetrically indicated were CSs performed on request or for psychological reasons without another medical reason. Binary and multinomial regression analysis were used to assess the associations.
Among 3308 primiparous women, sexual abuse as an adult (≥ 18 years) increased the risk of an elective CS, Adjusted Odds Ratio 2.12 (1.28-3.49), and the likelihood for a non-obstetrically indicated CS, OR 3.74 (1.24-11.24). Women expressing current suffering from the reported adult sexual abuse had the highest risk for an elective CS, AOR 4.07 (1.46-11.3). Neither physical abuse (in adulthood or childhood <18 years), nor sexual abuse in childhood increased the risk of any operative delivery among primiparous women. Among 3416 multiparous women, neither sexual, nor emotional abuse was significantly associated with any kind of operative delivery, while physical abuse had an increased AOR for emergency CS of 1.51 (1.05-2.19).
Sexual abuse as an adult increases the risk of an elective CS among women with no prior birth experience, in particular for non-obstetrical reasons. Among multiparous women, a history of physical abuse increases the risk of an emergency CS.
本研究的主要目的是评估怀孕期间报告的虐待史是否与剖宫产分娩有关。其次,我们评估这种关联是否因虐待类型而异,以及报告的虐待是在儿童时期还是成年时期经历的。
Bidens 研究是一项在六个欧洲国家(比利时、冰岛、丹麦、爱沙尼亚、挪威和瑞典)进行的队列研究,共招募了 6724 名接受常规产前保健的孕妇。通过问卷评估虐待史,并与医院记录中的产科信息相关联。主要结局指标为剖宫产分娩,作为二分类变量,并分为选择性剖宫产术(CS)、阴道分娩或紧急 CS。非产科指征的 CS 是指出于请求或心理原因进行的 CS,而没有其他医学原因。采用二项式和多项式回归分析评估关联。
在 3308 名初产妇中,成年期(≥18 岁)遭受性虐待会增加选择性 CS 的风险,调整后的优势比为 2.12(1.28-3.49),以及非产科指征 CS 的可能性,OR 为 3.74(1.24-11.24)。报告的成年期性虐待目前正在遭受痛苦的女性进行选择性 CS 的风险最高,AOR 为 4.07(1.46-11.3)。初产妇中,无论是成年期的身体虐待(<18 岁)还是儿童期的性虐待,都不会增加任何剖宫产分娩的风险。在 3416 名经产妇中,性虐待或情感虐待均与任何类型的剖宫产分娩无关,而身体虐待与急诊 CS 的 AOR 增加 1.51(1.05-2.19)。
对于没有先前分娩经验的女性,成年期的性虐待会增加选择性 CS 的风险,尤其是非产科原因。在经产妇中,身体虐待史会增加急诊 CS 的风险。