Patt Virginie M, Thomas Michael L, Minassian Arpi, Geyer Mark A, Brown Gregory G, Perry William
a Department of Psychiatry , University of California , San Diego , CA , USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(2):186-204. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2013.877123. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
The neurocognitive processes involved during classic spatial working memory (SWM) assessment were investigated by examining naturally preferred eye movement strategies. Cognitively healthy adult volunteers were tested in a computerized version of the Corsi Block-Tapping Task--a spatial span task requiring the short term maintenance of a series of locations presented in a specific order--coupled with eye tracking. Modeling analysis was developed to characterize eye-tracking patterns across all task phases, including encoding, retention, and recall. Results revealed a natural preference for local gaze maintenance during both encoding and retention, with fewer than 40% fixated targets. These findings contrasted with the stimulus retracing pattern expected during recall as a result of task demands, with 80% fixated targets. Along with participants' self-reported strategies of mentally "making shapes," these results suggest the involvement of covert attention shifts and higher order cognitive Gestalt processes during spatial span tasks, challenging instrument validity as a single measure of SWM storage capacity.
通过研究自然偏好的眼动策略,对经典空间工作记忆(SWM)评估过程中涉及的神经认知过程进行了调查。认知健康的成年志愿者在计算机化的Corsi方块敲击任务(一种空间跨度任务,要求按特定顺序短期维持一系列位置)与眼动追踪相结合的测试中接受测试。开发了建模分析来表征所有任务阶段(包括编码、保持和回忆)的眼动追踪模式。结果显示,在编码和保持过程中,自然倾向于局部注视维持,注视目标少于40%。这些发现与由于任务要求在回忆期间预期的刺激回溯模式形成对比,后者有80%的注视目标。连同参与者自我报告的在脑海中“塑造形状”的策略,这些结果表明在空间跨度任务中存在隐蔽的注意力转移和高阶认知格式塔过程,对作为SWM存储容量单一测量指标的仪器有效性提出了挑战。