• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence.一项比较一期缝合关闭与补片加强关闭以降低切口疝发生率的双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2013 Oct 28;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-48.
2
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性网片覆盖加强与单纯缝合预防中线切口疝的随机对照多中心双盲 2 年随访研究(PRIMA)
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开腹手术后使用小缝线腹壁闭合术加或不加网片增强进行疝修补(HULC试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3.
4
Abdominal incision defect following AAA-surgery (AIDA): 2-year results of prophylactic onlay-mesh augmentation in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.腹切口缺损在 AAA 手术后(AIDA):多中心、双盲、随机对照试验中预防性覆盖补片增强的 2 年结果。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1105-1116. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01125-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
5
Prevention of Incisional Hernias by Prophylactic Mesh-augmented Reinforcement of Midline Laparotomies for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.预防性使用补片加强腹主动脉瘤治疗中行正中剖腹术切口的疝修补:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):638-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001369.
6
Short-term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture with primary glued mesh augmentation to prevent incisional hernia.比较一期缝合与一期黏合补片加强预防切口疝的随机对照试验的短期结果。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):276-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000798.
7
Prophylactic sublay non-absorbable mesh positioning following midline laparotomy in a clean-contaminated field: randomized clinical trial (PROMETHEUS).预防性下腹膜下非吸收性网片定位在清洁污染区域的正中剖腹术后:随机临床试验(PROMETHEUS)。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):638-643. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab068.
8
Prophylactic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Reinforcement Reduces the Risk of Incisional Hernia, Two-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.预防性腹腔内补片加强可降低切口疝风险:一项随机临床试验的两年结果。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1687-1694. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4363-2.
9
Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在择期正中剖腹手术中预防性放置补片是否能降低切口疝的发生率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1149-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
10
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement vs. primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): long-term outcomes of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性覆盖和衬层网状加强与单纯一期缝合预防中线剖腹术后切口疝的多中心、双盲、随机对照试验(PRIMA):长期结果
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Nov 22;36:100787. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100787. eCollection 2024 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Are eviscerations preventable?脏器脱出能否预防?
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2025 Feb 21;52:e20253814. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20253814-en. eCollection 2025.
2
Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence-a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial).回肠袢式造口还纳术中预防性放置腹横肌后间隙补片对切口疝发生率的影响:一项多中心、随机、患者和观察者双盲临床试验(P.E.L.I.O.N 试验)。
Trials. 2023 Feb 1;24(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07089-3.
3
The effect of prophylactic mesh implantation on the development of incisional hernias in patients with elevated BMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性植入网片对 BMI 较高患者切口疝发展的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):225-234. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02675-x. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Assessment of Quality of Life after Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.血管内修复与开放性腹主动脉瘤修复术后生活质量评估:一项回顾性单中心研究
J Clin Med. 2022 May 27;11(11):3017. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113017.
5
A Biomechanical Analysis of Prophylactic Mesh Reinforced Porcine Laparotomy Incisions.预防性网片加强猪剖腹切口的生物力学分析。
J Surg Res. 2022 Oct;278:196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.058. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Prophylactic Mesh After Midline Laparotomy: Evidence is out There, but why do Surgeons Hesitate?剖腹术后预防性使用网片:证据已经存在,但为什么外科医生还在犹豫?
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1349-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05898-0. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
7
Can Electric Nose Breath Analysis Identify Abdominal Wall Hernia Recurrence and Aortic Aneurysms? A Proof-of-Concept Study.电子鼻呼吸分析能否识别腹壁疝复发和腹主动脉瘤?一项概念验证研究。
Surg Innov. 2020 Aug;27(4):366-372. doi: 10.1177/1553350620917898. Epub 2020 May 23.
8
PRevention of INCisional hernia after liver transplantation (PRINC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.预防肝移植术后切口疝(PRINC 试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 20;20(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3477-2.
9
Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results.使用交联猪真皮胶原蛋白生物补片行造口旁疝修补术:长期结果
Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):321-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1452-8. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
10
BariSurg trial: Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese patients with BMI 35-60 kg/m(2) - a multi-centre randomized patient and observer blind non-inferiority trial.巴里外科手术试验:在体重指数为35 - 60 kg/m²的肥胖患者中,袖状胃切除术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的比较——一项多中心随机、患者和观察者双盲的非劣效性试验。
BMC Surg. 2015 Jul 18;15:87. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0072-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of fibrin sealant (Tisseel/Tissucol) in hernia repair: a systematic review.在疝修补术中使用纤维蛋白密封剂(Tisseel/Tissucol):系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1803-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2156-0. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
2
Long-term outcome with the prophylactic use of polypropylene mesh in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion.肥胖患者行胆胰分流术后应用聚丙烯网预防的长期结果。
Obes Surg. 2012 Feb;22(2):279-82. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0486-y.
3
Does prophylactic biologic mesh placement protect against the development of incisional hernia in high-risk patients?预防性生物补片放置是否能预防高危患者切口疝的发生?
World J Surg. 2011 Jul;35(7):1651-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1131-6.
4
Incisional hernia in patients at risk: can it be prevented?高危患者的切口疝:能否预防?
Hernia. 2011 Aug;15(4):371-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0794-0. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
5
Incisional hernia prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion.肥胖症患者行胆胰分流术后切口疝预防。
Obes Surg. 2011 Oct;21(10):1559-63. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0282-0.
6
Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.开放式腹主动脉瘤手术后网片与缝线缝合伤口闭合的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2010 Oct;97(10):1497-502. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7137.
7
Prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernia: a note of caution.预防切口疝的预防性补片:一则警示
Am J Surg. 2009 May;197(5):595-8; discussion 598. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.002.
8
Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).用于闭合初次择期腹部正中切口的间断或连续可缓慢吸收缝线:一项多中心随机试验(INSECT:ISRCTN24023541)
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):576-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8.
9
Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients.高危患者腹部正中切口的预防性人工加固
Hernia. 2009 Jun;13(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0484-3. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
10
Mesh fixation with fibrin glue (Tissucol/Tisseel) in hernia repair dependent on the mesh structure--is there an optimum fibrin-mesh combination?--investigations on a biomechanical model.网片固定用纤维蛋白胶(Tissucol/Tisseel)在依赖于网片结构的疝修补术中——是否存在最佳的纤维蛋白-网片组合?——生物力学模型研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;395(5):569-74. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0466-z. Epub 2009 Jan 31.

一项比较一期缝合关闭与补片加强关闭以降低切口疝发生率的双盲随机对照试验。

A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence.

作者信息

Nieuwenhuizen Jeroen, Eker Hasan H, Timmermans Lucas, Hop Wim C J, Kleinrensink Gert-Jan, Jeekel Johannes, Lange Johan F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2013 Oct 28;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-48.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2482-13-48
PMID:24499111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3840708/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication after laparotomy causing much morbidity and even mortality. The overall incidence remains 11-20%, despite studies attempting to optimize closing techniques. Two patient groups, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and obese patients, have a risk for incisional hernia after laparotomy of more than 30%. These patients might benefit from mesh augmented midline closure as a means to reduce incisional hernia incidence.

METHODS/DESIGN: The PRImary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wound (PRIMA) trial is a double-blinded international multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing running slowly absorbable suture closure with the same closure augmented with a sublay or onlay mesh. Primary endpoint will be incisional hernia incidence 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will be postoperative complications, pain, quality of life and cost effectiveness.A total of 460 patients will be included in three arms of the study and randomized between running suture closure, onlay mesh closure or sublay mesh closure. Follow-up will be at 1, 3, 12 and 24 months with ultrasound imaging performed at 6 and 24 months to objectify the presence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded throughout the whole follow up.

DISCCUSION

The use of prosthetic mesh has proven effective and safe in incisional hernia surgery however its use in a prophylactic manner has yet to be properly investigated. The PRIMA trial will provide level 1b evidence whether mesh augmented midline abdominal closure reduces incisional hernia incidence in high risk groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial.gov NCT00761475.

摘要

背景

切口疝是剖腹手术后最常见的远期并发症,会导致较高的发病率甚至死亡率。尽管有研究试图优化缝合技术,但总体发病率仍为11%-20%。两组患者,即腹主动脉瘤患者和肥胖患者,剖腹手术后发生切口疝的风险超过30%。这些患者可能会从使用补片加强中线缝合中获益,以此降低切口疝的发生率。

方法/设计:腹部中线伤口初次补片缝合(PRIMA)试验是一项双盲国际多中心随机对照试验,比较连续缓慢可吸收缝线缝合与采用腹膜前或腹膜上补片加强的相同缝合方式。主要终点是术后2年的切口疝发生率。次要结局包括术后并发症、疼痛、生活质量和成本效益。该研究的三个组将共纳入460例患者,并随机分为连续缝线缝合组、腹膜上补片缝合组或腹膜前补片缝合组。随访时间为1、3、12和24个月,在6个月和24个月时进行超声成像,以确定切口疝的存在。在整个随访过程中,患者、研究人员和放射科医生都将处于盲态。

讨论

在切口疝手术中,人工补片的使用已被证明有效且安全,但其预防性使用尚未得到充分研究。PRIMA试验将提供1b级证据,证明补片加强的腹部中线缝合是否能降低高危人群的切口疝发生率。

试验注册

Clinical trial.gov NCT00761475。