• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防性植入网片对 BMI 较高患者切口疝发展的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effect of prophylactic mesh implantation on the development of incisional hernias in patients with elevated BMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Study Center of the German Surgical Society, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):225-234. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02675-x. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-022-02675-x
PMID:36103010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10126020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is a common complication after midline laparotomy. In certain risk profiles incidences can reach up to 70%. Large RCTs showed a positive effect of prophylactic mesh reinforcement (PMR) in high-risk populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the effect of prophylactic mesh reinforcement on incisional hernia reduction in obese patients after midline laparotomies.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search in Medline, Web of Science and CENTRAL was conducted. RCTs investigating PMR in patients with a BMI ≥ 27 reporting incisional hernia as primary outcome were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and certainty of evidence was rated according to the GRADE Working Group grading of evidence. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Out of 2298 articles found by a systematic literature search, five RCTs with 1136 patients were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of incisional hernia when comparing PMR with primary suture (odds ratio (OR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-1.01, p = 0.06, GRADE: low). Meta-analyses of seroma formation (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.72-3.65; p = 0.24, GRADE: low) and surgical site infections (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.72-3.22, p = 0.28, GRADE: moderate) showed no significant differences as well as subgroup analyses for BMI ≥ 40 and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe a significant reduction of the incidence of incisional hernia with prophylactic mesh reinforcement used in patients with elevated BMI. These results stand in contrast to the current recommendation for hernia prevention in obese patients.

摘要

背景

切口疝是腹部正中切开术后的常见并发症。在某些高危人群中,发病率可高达 70%。大型随机对照试验显示,预防性补片加固(PMR)对高危人群具有积极作用。

目的

评估预防性补片加固对腹部正中切开术后肥胖患者切口疝发生率的影响。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南,对 Medline、Web of Science 和 CENTRAL 进行系统文献检索。纳入研究 PMR 对 BMI≥27 且切口疝为主要结局的患者的 RCT。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估研究质量,并根据 GRADE 工作组证据分级标准评定证据确定性。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。次要结局包括术后并发症。

结果

系统文献检索共发现 2298 篇文章,纳入 5 项 RCT 共 1136 例患者。与单纯缝合相比,PMR 并未显著降低切口疝的发生率(比值比(OR)0.59,95%置信区间(CI)0.34-1.01,p=0.06,GRADE:低)。对血清肿形成(OR 1.62,95%CI 0.72-3.65;p=0.24,GRADE:低)和手术部位感染(OR 1.52,95%CI 0.72-3.22,p=0.28,GRADE:中)的荟萃分析也未显示出显著差异,且 BMI≥40 和住院时间的亚组分析也无差异。

结论

我们未观察到预防性补片加固在肥胖患者中能显著降低切口疝的发生率。这些结果与当前对肥胖患者预防疝的建议相悖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/f8dd34287e44/10029_2022_2675_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/af3062a0cf30/10029_2022_2675_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/44a22649b88c/10029_2022_2675_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/955d0501103e/10029_2022_2675_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/8ed6e2df5f6b/10029_2022_2675_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/991616980916/10029_2022_2675_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/f8dd34287e44/10029_2022_2675_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/af3062a0cf30/10029_2022_2675_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/44a22649b88c/10029_2022_2675_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/955d0501103e/10029_2022_2675_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/8ed6e2df5f6b/10029_2022_2675_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/991616980916/10029_2022_2675_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4115/10126020/f8dd34287e44/10029_2022_2675_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of prophylactic mesh implantation on the development of incisional hernias in patients with elevated BMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性植入网片对 BMI 较高患者切口疝发展的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):225-234. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02675-x. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Prophylactic mesh reinforcement for midline incisional hernia prevention: systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.预防性网片加固在预防中线切口疝中的应用:系统评价和随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):213-224. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02660-4. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement versus Sutured Closure to Prevent Incisional Hernias after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair via Midline Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.剖腹开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术后应用预防性网片加强与缝线缝合预防切口疝的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;56(1):120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
4
Prevention of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy with prophylactic mesh reinforcement: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.预防性应用网片加固在预防腹正中切口疝中的作用:荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):357-368. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50261. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在择期正中剖腹手术中预防性放置补片是否能降低切口疝的发生率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1149-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性网片覆盖加强与单纯缝合预防中线切口疝的随机对照多中心双盲 2 年随访研究(PRIMA)
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
7
Prophylactic Mesh After Midline Laparotomy: Evidence is out There, but why do Surgeons Hesitate?剖腹术后预防性使用网片:证据已经存在,但为什么外科医生还在犹豫?
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1349-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05898-0. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy.系统评价和荟萃分析:预防性放置网片预防中线剖腹术后切口疝。
Hernia. 2013 Aug;17(4):445-55. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1119-2. Epub 2013 May 28.
9
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement Versus Primary Suture for Abdominal Wall Closure after Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Midline Laparotomy Incision: Updated Systematic Review Including Time-To-Event Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.预防性补片加固与直接缝合在经腹直肌切口行择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后腹壁关闭中的应用:包括时间事件荟萃分析和随机对照试验序贯分析的更新系统评价。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;109:149-161. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.026. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
10
Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性补片在急诊剖腹术后腹壁关闭中的作用?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):441-447. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02060-1. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights into incisional hernia: Factors, symptoms and treatment options.切口疝洞察:相关因素、症状及治疗选择
Bioinformation. 2025 May 31;21(5):1217-1220. doi: 10.6026/973206300211217. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic reviews in surgery-recommendations from the Study Center of the German Society of Surgery.外科学系统评价——德国外科学会研究中心的建议。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):1723-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02204-x. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
2
Prophylactic sublay non-absorbable mesh positioning following midline laparotomy in a clean-contaminated field: randomized clinical trial (PROMETHEUS).预防性下腹膜下非吸收性网片定位在清洁污染区域的正中剖腹术后:随机临床试验(PROMETHEUS)。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):638-643. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab068.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Prophylactic Mesh After Midline Laparotomy: Evidence is out There, but why do Surgeons Hesitate?剖腹术后预防性使用网片:证据已经存在,但为什么外科医生还在犹豫?
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1349-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05898-0. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
The impact of negative pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions on surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.负压伤口疗法对闭合性手术切口的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2020 Jun;167(6):1001-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Prevention of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy with prophylactic mesh reinforcement: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.预防性应用网片加固在预防腹正中切口疝中的作用:荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):357-368. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50261. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
7
Abdominal Closure and the Risk of Incisional Hernia in Aneurysm Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹部闭合术与动脉瘤手术切口疝风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;59(2):227-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.041. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
8
Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开腹手术后使用小缝线腹壁闭合术加或不加网片增强进行疝修补(HULC试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3.
9
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
10
Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of midline laparotomy closure with onlay mesh.一项关于中线剖腹手术用补片覆盖闭合的前瞻性随机试验的长期结果
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):335-340. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01891-2. Epub 2019 Jan 30.