Mazzietti Audric, Sellem Virginie, Koenig Olivier
a Laboratoire EMC , Université Lumière Lyon 2 , Bron , France.
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(8):1483-92. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.884488. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
The Component Process Model posits that attention is appraisal-driven rather than stimulus-driven and that the appraisal of relevance is of critical importance in such a mechanism. This means that any stimulus can attract attention or not depending on how relevant it is appraised. This hypothesis was tested in an implicit border similarity judgement task, in which thirsty participants were presented with bottles and vases that were respectively very relevant and weakly relevant to their goal to quench their thirst. These stimuli were also presented to quenched participants for whom none of the stimuli was relevant. The findings support the idea that our attention is more likely to be appraisal-driven than stimulus-driven, since bottles produced an attentional interference in thirsty participants only. It was also observed that, even if vases were judged weakly relevant by thirsty participants, they produced an attentional interference compared to empty stimuli, which was not the case in the quenched participants group. The concept of goal relatedness was proposed as an explanation for this result, and methodological implications were also discussed.
成分加工模型假定,注意力是由评价驱动而非刺激驱动的,并且在这种机制中,相关性评价至关重要。这意味着任何刺激能否吸引注意力取决于其被评价出的相关性程度。该假设在一项内隐边界相似性判断任务中得到了验证,在该任务中,向口渴的参与者展示了分别与他们解渴目标高度相关和弱相关的瓶子和花瓶。这些刺激物也展示给了解渴的参与者,对他们来说所有刺激物都不相关。研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即我们的注意力更有可能是由评价驱动而非刺激驱动的,因为瓶子仅对口渴的参与者产生了注意力干扰。研究还观察到,即使口渴的参与者认为花瓶相关性较弱,但与空白刺激相比,花瓶仍产生了注意力干扰,而在解渴的参与者组中并非如此。目标相关性的概念被提出来解释这一结果,同时也讨论了方法学上的意义。