• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么扫视执行会增强情景记忆提取?自上而下的注意力控制假说检验。

Why does saccade execution increase episodic memory retrieval? A test of the top-down attentional control hypothesis.

作者信息

Lyle Keith B, Edlin James M

机构信息

a Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences , University of Louisville , Louisville , KY , USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2015;23(2):187-202. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.877487. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2013.877487
PMID:24499320
Abstract

Making repetitive saccadic eye movements has been found to increase subsequent episodic memory retrieval and also to increase subsequent top-down attentional control. We theorise that these effects are related such that saccade-induced changes in attentional processing facilitate memory retrieval. We tested this idea by examining the effect of saccade execution on retrieval conditions that differed in relative ease of consciously accessing episodic memories. Based on recent theories of episodic retrieval, we reasoned that there is a larger role for top-down attention when memories are more difficult to access. Consequently, we expected saccade execution to have a greater facilitative effect on retrieval when memories were more difficult to access. We obtained the expected result in a recall procedure in Experiment 1 and in a recognition procedure in Experiment 2. We also examined an individual difference factor--consistency of handedness--as a possible moderator of saccade execution effects on retrieval. We discuss how our top-down attentional control hypothesis can be extended to explain beneficial effects of saccade execution on other types of cognition, as well as negative effects on retrieval in some cases.

摘要

研究发现,进行重复性的眼球快速跳动会增强后续的情景记忆提取能力,同时也会增强后续自上而下的注意力控制能力。我们提出理论,认为这些效应是相关联的,即眼球跳动引起的注意力加工变化有助于记忆提取。我们通过研究眼球跳动执行对不同难易程度的有意识提取情景记忆的检索条件的影响来验证这一观点。基于近期的情景记忆检索理论,我们推断,当记忆更难提取时,自上而下的注意力发挥的作用更大。因此,我们预期当记忆更难提取时,眼球跳动执行对检索的促进作用会更大。我们在实验1的回忆程序和实验2的识别程序中都得到了预期结果。我们还考察了一个个体差异因素——利手的一致性——作为眼球跳动执行对检索影响的一个可能调节因素。我们讨论了如何扩展我们的自上而下注意力控制假设,以解释眼球跳动执行对其他类型认知的有益影响,以及在某些情况下对检索的负面影响。

相似文献

1
Why does saccade execution increase episodic memory retrieval? A test of the top-down attentional control hypothesis.为什么扫视执行会增强情景记忆提取?自上而下的注意力控制假说检验。
Memory. 2015;23(2):187-202. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.877487. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
2
The effect of repetitive saccade execution on the attention network test: enhancing executive function with a flick of the eyes.反复扫视对注意网络测试的影响:通过快速眨眼增强执行功能。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Apr;81(3):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
3
Effects of handedness consistency and saccade execution on eyewitness memory in cued- and free-recall procedures.利手一致性和扫视执行对线索回忆和自由回忆程序中目击者记忆的影响。
Memory. 2018 Oct;26(9):1169-1180. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1420802. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Inconsistent handedness and saccade execution benefit face memory without affecting interhemispheric interaction.非一致性利手性和眼跳执行有益于面孔记忆而不影响大脑两半球间的相互作用。
Memory. 2011 Aug;19(6):613-24. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.595418.
5
Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.自上而下和自下而上对记忆的注意:关于顶叶后皮质在记忆检索中作用的一种假设(AtoM)
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1828-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.022. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
6
Is saccade-induced retrieval enhancement a potential means of improving eyewitness evidence?扫视诱发的检索增强是否是提高目击证人证据的一种潜在手段?
Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):581-94. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.493891. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
7
Effects of handedness & saccadic bilateral eye movements on the specificity of past autobiographical memory & episodic future thinking.利手与双眼扫视性双侧眼动对过去自传体记忆及情景性未来思维特异性的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Jun;114:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
Bilateral saccadic eye movements and tactile stimulation, but not auditory stimulation, enhance memory retrieval.双侧扫视眼动和触觉刺激,而不是听觉刺激,增强记忆检索。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Feb;81(1):52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
9
Bilateral saccades increase intrahemispheric processing but not interhemispheric interaction: Implications for saccade-induced retrieval enhancement.双侧扫视增加半球内加工但不增加半球间相互作用:对扫视诱发提取增强的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Jul;73(2):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 8.
10
Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories.双眼运动可增强情景记忆的提取。
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):221-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.221.

引用本文的文献

1
The electrophysiological underpinnings of variation in verbal working memory capacity.言语工作记忆容量变化的电生理基础。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 30;10(1):16090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72940-5.
2
Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.重新评估双眼运动是否影响记忆检索。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 27;15(1):e0227790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227790. eCollection 2020.
3
Saccade-induced retrieval enhancement and the recovery of perceptual item-specific information.扫视诱发的检索增强与特定感知项目信息的恢复
Cogn Process. 2020 May;21(2):223-237. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00943-w. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Saccades and handedness interact to affect scene memory.扫视与利手相互作用以影响情景记忆。
PeerJ. 2018 Nov 15;6:e5969. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5969. eCollection 2018.
5
Replication Requires Psychological Rather than Statistical Hypotheses: The Case of Eye Movements Enhancing Word Recollection.复制需要心理学而非统计学假设:眼动增强单词回忆的案例。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 26;7:2023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02023. eCollection 2016.