• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利手一致性和扫视执行对线索回忆和自由回忆程序中目击者记忆的影响。

Effects of handedness consistency and saccade execution on eyewitness memory in cued- and free-recall procedures.

作者信息

Lyle Keith B

机构信息

a Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences , University of Louisville , Louisville , KY , USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2018 Oct;26(9):1169-1180. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1420802. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2017.1420802
PMID:29295669
Abstract

Identifying characteristics that distinguish between people with relatively good versus poor episodic memory is an important goal of eyewitness-memory research, as is identifying activities that can improve people's ability to retrieve episodic memories. Consistency of hand preference is a trait associated with the quality of people's episodic memory and repetitive saccade execution is an activity known to improve people's ability to retrieve episodic memories. These factors were examined in relation to cued and free recall of a staged criminal event. Individuals with inconsistent hand preference (versus consistent) remembered more on a cued-recall test and also freely recalled a larger amount of victim information. Repetitive saccade execution did not increase cued recall but did increase free recall of victim information. Theoretical implications are discussed, as is potential practical significance, with an emphasis on the size of the observed effects.

摘要

识别能区分情节记忆相对较好与较差的人的特征,是目击者记忆研究的一个重要目标,识别能提高人们情节记忆提取能力的活动也是如此。用手偏好的一致性是一种与人们情节记忆质量相关的特征,而重复扫视执行是一种已知能提高人们情节记忆提取能力的活动。针对一起模拟犯罪事件的线索回忆和自由回忆,对这些因素进行了研究。用手偏好不一致(相对于一致)的个体在线索回忆测试中记住的更多,并且自由回忆出的受害者信息也更多。重复扫视执行并没有增加线索回忆,但确实增加了对受害者信息的自由回忆。本文讨论了理论意义以及潜在的实际意义,重点是观察到的效应大小。

相似文献

1
Effects of handedness consistency and saccade execution on eyewitness memory in cued- and free-recall procedures.利手一致性和扫视执行对线索回忆和自由回忆程序中目击者记忆的影响。
Memory. 2018 Oct;26(9):1169-1180. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1420802. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
2
Why does saccade execution increase episodic memory retrieval? A test of the top-down attentional control hypothesis.为什么扫视执行会增强情景记忆提取?自上而下的注意力控制假说检验。
Memory. 2015;23(2):187-202. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.877487. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
3
Inconsistent handedness and saccade execution benefit face memory without affecting interhemispheric interaction.非一致性利手性和眼跳执行有益于面孔记忆而不影响大脑两半球间的相互作用。
Memory. 2011 Aug;19(6):613-24. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.595418.
4
Is saccade-induced retrieval enhancement a potential means of improving eyewitness evidence?扫视诱发的检索增强是否是提高目击证人证据的一种潜在手段?
Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):581-94. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.493891. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
5
The effect of repetitive saccade execution on the attention network test: enhancing executive function with a flick of the eyes.反复扫视对注意网络测试的影响:通过快速眨眼增强执行功能。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Apr;81(3):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
6
Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.回忆一个有他人见证的事件会增加目击者的易受暗示性:反向测试效应。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):66-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02245.x. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
7
Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.通过提示回忆进行高度特定学习的条件。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):634-640. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01593-x.
8
Effects of handedness & saccadic bilateral eye movements on the specificity of past autobiographical memory & episodic future thinking.利手与双眼扫视性双侧眼动对过去自传体记忆及情景性未来思维特异性的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Jun;114:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
9
Mechanisms of output interference in cued recall.线索回忆中的输出干扰机制。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jan;48(1):51-68. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00961-1.
10
Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance.使用元记忆测量和记忆测试来估计目击证人的自由回忆表现。
Memory. 2020 Jan;28(1):94-106. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1688835. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
No Incidental Memory Advantage for Mixed Handed vs. Consistent Right Handed Participants: Conflicting Results From Earlier Research.混合利手与一致右利手参与者无偶然记忆优势:早期研究结果存在冲突。
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Dec;131(6):2049-2068. doi: 10.1177/00315125241291266. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
2
On the Effect of Bilateral Eye Movements on Memory Retrieval in Ageing and Dementia.双侧眼球运动对衰老与痴呆患者记忆提取的影响
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 27;12(10):1299. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101299.
3
Saccade-induced retrieval enhancement and the recovery of perceptual item-specific information.
扫视诱发的检索增强与特定感知项目信息的恢复
Cogn Process. 2020 May;21(2):223-237. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00943-w. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
The Return of the Repressed: The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma.被压抑的回归:被长久遗忘的创伤的持续而棘手的主张。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;14(6):1072-1095. doi: 10.1177/1745691619862306. Epub 2019 Oct 4.