Suppr超能文献

整骨触诊经验与目标识别的关系。

The relation of experience in osteopathic palpation and object identification.

作者信息

Sabini Rosanna C, Leo Chadwick S, Moore Alton E

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, North Shore LIJ - Southside Hospital, 301 East Main Street, Bay Shore, NY 11706, USA.

出版信息

Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Nov 12;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-38.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine whether osteopathic medical students, fellows, residents, and practicing physicians differ in their ability to identify inanimate objects and if these skills relate to palpatory experience.

METHODS

Fifteen commonly known objects were fixed to a board and blinded with a cotton cloth. In Part I of testing, participants were asked to identify 9 objects, with choices provided. In Part II participants were asked to identify 6 objects using one word only. Part III consisted of identifying the shape of an object in Part II.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine osteopathic medical students, fellows, residents, and practicing physicians participated in the study. Overall, correct identification of objects was higher in Part I with choices than in Part II without choices available. No statistically significant difference was found among osteopathic medical students, fellows, residents, and practicing physicians in the correct identification of the objects.

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy in tactile identification of objects among varying levels of palpatory experience was not found. Correlation with clinical palpation cannot be made as it requires a subset of palpatory skills not tested in this study. Accuracy and measurement of palpation should be studied further to demonstrate if palpatory experience improves palpatory accuracy.

摘要

背景

确定整骨医学专业的学生、研究员、住院医师和执业医师在识别无生命物体的能力上是否存在差异,以及这些技能是否与触诊经验相关。

方法

将15个常见物体固定在一块板上,并用棉布遮盖使其不可见。在测试的第一部分,要求参与者从提供的选项中识别9个物体。在第二部分,要求参与者只用一个词识别6个物体。第三部分包括识别第二部分中一个物体的形状。

结果

89名整骨医学专业的学生、研究员、住院医师和执业医师参与了该研究。总体而言,在第一部分有选项时物体的正确识别率高于第二部分无选项时。在整骨医学专业的学生、研究员、住院医师和执业医师之间,物体的正确识别率未发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

未发现不同触诊经验水平的人在通过触觉识别物体方面的准确性差异。由于临床触诊需要本研究未测试的一部分触诊技能,因此无法建立与临床触诊的相关性。应进一步研究触诊的准确性和测量方法,以证明触诊经验是否能提高触诊准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b7/3843593/2737dcd751bd/2045-709X-21-38-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验