Cook N S, Quast U, Hof R P, Baumlin Y, Pally C
Cardiovascular Unit of Preclinical Research, Sandoz Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988 Jan;11(1):90-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198801000-00014.
The present study compares the in vitro and in vivo activities of pinacidil with another new vasodilator drug, BRL 34915, claimed to act via the opening of K+ channels in vascular smooth muscle. In the rabbit aorta, BRL 34915 and pinacidil caused rightward shifts of the KCl concentration-response curve and noncompetitively antagonized angiotensin II contractions, yielding an IC50 of 5 and 10 microM, respectively. In 86Rb-loaded guinea pig portal veins, both BRL 34915 and pinacidil stimulated 86Rb+ efflux over the concentration range 0.3-30 microM. At saturating concentrations, the maximum efflux elicited by pinacidil was only one-third that of BRL 34915. Spontaneous activity measured simultaneously from the same vessels was inhibited by BRL 34915 and pinacidil with an IC50 of 12 and 32 nM, respectively. Effects on mechanical activity were thus observed at drug concentrations 100-fold lower than those required to stimulate 86Rb+ efflux. In anesthetized rats, both compounds rapidly lowered blood pressure, with BRL 34915 being threefold more potent than pinacidil in this respect. Tachycardia was more pronounced after BRL 34915 than after pinacidil. Angiotensin II pressor responses were poorly antagonized by these two vasodilators in rats, in marked contrast to the potent effects of Ca2+ antagonists on these responses at equieffective hypotensive doses. We conclude the pinacidil, like BRL 34915, is a potent antihypertensive that is able to enhance the K+ permeability of vascular smooth muscle. The similarities between these two drugs suggest they have a common mechanism of action. However, the discrepancy between the concentrations of these drugs necessary to stimulate 86Rb efflux, and those at which mechanical effects are seen in the portal vein, do not rule out the possibility that other actions may contribute to their vasodilator activities.
本研究比较了吡那地尔与另一种新型血管扩张药物BRL 34915的体外和体内活性,据称BRL 34915通过开放血管平滑肌中的钾通道发挥作用。在兔主动脉中,BRL 34915和吡那地尔使氯化钾浓度-反应曲线右移,并非竞争性拮抗血管紧张素II的收缩作用,其IC50分别为5和10微摩尔。在装载86Rb的豚鼠门静脉中,BRL 34915和吡那地尔在0.3 - 30微摩尔的浓度范围内均刺激86Rb+外流。在饱和浓度下,吡那地尔引起的最大外流仅为BRL 34915的三分之一。从同一血管同时测量的自发活动被BRL 34915和吡那地尔抑制,其IC50分别为12和32纳摩尔。因此,在刺激86Rb+外流所需药物浓度的100倍以下就观察到了对机械活动的影响。在麻醉大鼠中,这两种化合物均迅速降低血压,在这方面BRL 34915的效力比吡那地尔高三倍。BRL 34915后的心动过速比吡那地尔后更明显。在大鼠中,这两种血管扩张剂对血管紧张素II升压反应的拮抗作用较弱,这与钙拮抗剂在等效降压剂量下对这些反应的强效作用形成显著对比。我们得出结论,吡那地尔与BRL 34915一样,是一种强效抗高血压药物,能够增强血管平滑肌的钾通透性。这两种药物之间的相似性表明它们具有共同的作用机制。然而,刺激86Rb外流所需的这些药物浓度与门静脉中观察到机械效应的浓度之间的差异,并不能排除其他作用可能对其血管扩张活性有贡献的可能性。