• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磺达肝癸钠联合盐酸替罗非班在接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的临床疗效及安全性

[The clinical efficacy and safety of fondaparinux combined with tirofiban hydrochloride in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention].

作者信息

Li Mu-wei, Zhao Xiang-mei, Rao Li-xin, Chen Yan, Zhu Zhong-yu, Gao Chuan-yu

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003, China. Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;52(12):1037-40.

PMID:24503402
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux combined with tirofiban in patients with high risk unstable angina (UA) undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) .

METHODS

A total of 389 patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups receiving either fondaparinux with tirofiban or enoxaparin with tirofiban. Bleeding, thrombosis and main adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared between the two groups during hospitalization, at week 2 and week 4 after discharge.

RESULTS

No severe bleeding was observed during hospitalization in the both groups, while lower rate of mild and minor bleeding was shown in the fondaparinux group (0 vs 1.5% and 18.2% vs 34.5%, P = 0.04 and P < 0.001 respectively). No difference was found between the two groups in the rate of MACE during hospitalization, at week 2 and week 4 weeks after discharge. The rates of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, refractory myocardial ischemia and target vessel revascularization were 0.5% vs 1.0%, 0.5% vs 1.0%, 1.6% vs 1.0% and 2.1% vs 1.5% during hospitalization; 0 vs 0, 1.0% vs 0.5%, 1.0% vs 1.5%, 0.5% vs 1.0% at week 2 after discharge; 0.5% vs 0.5%, 0.5% vs 0.5%, 2.6% vs 2.0%, 0 vs 0.5% at week 4 after discharge (all P values>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination therapy of fondaparinux and tirofiban is of good safety and efficacy in high risk UA patients undergoing complex PCI.

摘要

目的

探讨磺达肝癸钠联合替罗非班在接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的高危不稳定型心绞痛(UA)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

共纳入389例患者,随机分为两组,分别接受磺达肝癸钠联合替罗非班或依诺肝素联合替罗非班治疗。比较两组患者住院期间、出院后第2周和第4周的出血、血栓形成及主要不良心血管事件(MACE)情况。

结果

两组患者住院期间均未观察到严重出血,而磺达肝癸钠组轻度和轻微出血发生率较低(分别为0 vs 1.5%和18.2% vs 34.5%,P = 0.04和P < 0.001)。两组患者住院期间、出院后第2周和第4周的MACE发生率无差异。住院期间死亡、再发心肌梗死、难治性心肌缺血及靶血管血运重建率分别为0.5% vs 1.0%、0.5% vs 1.0%、1.6% vs 1.0%和2.1% vs 1.5%;出院后第2周分别为0 vs 0、1.0% vs 0.5%、1.0% vs 1.5%、0.5% vs 1.0%;出院后第4周分别为0.5% vs 0.5%、0.5% vs 0.5%、2.6% vs 2.0%、0 vs 0.5%(所有P值>0.05)。

结论

磺达肝癸钠与替罗非班联合治疗在接受复杂PCI的高危UA患者中具有良好的安全性和疗效。

相似文献

1
[The clinical efficacy and safety of fondaparinux combined with tirofiban hydrochloride in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention].磺达肝癸钠联合盐酸替罗非班在接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的临床疗效及安全性
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;52(12):1037-40.
2
Periprocedural use of tirofiban in elective percutaneous coronary intervention for long coronary lesions in stable patients with overlapping drug-eluting stents--the PETITION study: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.替罗非班在置入药物洗脱支架的稳定型患者择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗长冠状动脉病变围手术期的应用——PETITION研究:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Mar;85 Suppl 1:762-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25864.
3
[Short- or long-outcome of early tirofiban in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention].[替罗非班早期应用于接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的短期或长期预后]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;53(4):273-7.
4
Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial.磺达肝癸钠与依诺肝素在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:来自OASIS-5试验的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 30;50(18):1742-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.042. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉内注射与静脉注射替罗非班的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10(6):e0129718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129718. eCollection 2015.
6
Effects of upstream tirofiban versus downstream tirofiban on myocardial damage and 180-day clinical outcomes in high-risk acute coronary syndromes patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.替罗非班上游治疗与下游治疗对高危急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心肌损伤及 180 天临床结局的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Aug 5;122(15):1732-7.
7
[Efficacy and safety of tirofiban use after successful percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with moderate to high risk non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes].替罗非班用于中高危非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功后的疗效及安全性
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;41(9):731-5.
8
Downstream administration of a high-dose tirofiban bolus in high-risk patients with unstable angina undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention.在接受早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高危不稳定型心绞痛患者中进行大剂量替罗非班推注的下游给药。
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Feb 15;107(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.03.025.
9
[Clinical outcomes and safety of primary percutaneous coronary intervention combined with tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction].[急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合替罗非班治疗的临床疗效及安全性]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;35(11):1005-9.
10
Short-term effect of upstream administration in comparison to deferred injection of tirofiban on patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,与延迟替罗非班注射相比,上游给药的短期疗效。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Aug;26(4):332-9. doi: 10.1111/joic.12044. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Pentasaccharides for the prevention of venous thromboembolism.用于预防静脉血栓栓塞的五糖
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 31;10(10):CD005134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005134.pub3.
2
Effects of different routes of tirofiban injection on the left ventricular function and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班不同注射途径对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心肌梗死患者左心室功能及预后的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Jun;9(6):2401-2405. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2401. Epub 2015 Apr 1.