Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay, Lancaster, UK.
BJOG. 2014 May;121(6):747-53; discussion 754. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12585. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
To compare long-term outcomes following microwave endometrial ablation (MEA™) and thermal balloon ablation (TBall).
Follow up of a prospective, double-blind randomised controlled trial at 5 years.
A teaching hospital in the UK.
A total of 320 women eligible for and requesting endometrial ablation.
Eligible women were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to undergo MEA or Tball. Postal questionnaires were sent to participants at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively to determine satisfaction with outcome, menstrual status, bleeding scores and quality of life measurement. Subsequent surgery was ascertained from the women and the hospital operative database.
The primary outcome measure was overall satisfaction with treatment. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of menstrual loss, change in quality of life scores and subsequent surgery.
Of the women originally randomised 217/314 (69.1%) returned questionnaires. Nonresponders were assumed to be treatment failures for data analysis. The primary outcome of satisfaction was similar in both groups (58% for MEA™ versus 53% for TBall, difference 5%; 95% CI -6 to 16%). Amenorrhoea rates were high following both techniques (51% versus 45%, difference 6%; 95% CI -5 to 17%). There was no significant difference in the hysterectomy rates between the two arms (9% versus 7%, difference 2%; 95% CI -5 to 9%).
At 5 years post-treatment there were no significant clinical differences in patient satisfaction, menstrual status, quality of life scores or hysterectomy rates between MEA™ and Thermachoice 3, thermal balloon ablation.
比较微波子宫内膜消融术(MEA)和热球消融术(TBall)的长期疗效。
前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验的 5 年随访。
英国一所教学医院。
共 320 名符合条件并要求行子宫内膜消融术的女性。
将符合条件的女性以 1:1 的比例随机分为 MEA 或 Tball 组。术后至少 5 年,通过邮寄问卷的方式向患者询问对治疗结果的满意度、月经状况、出血评分和生活质量测量结果。随后从患者和医院手术数据库中确定是否需要进一步手术。
总治疗满意度为主要观察指标。次要观察指标包括月经失血评分、生活质量评分变化和后续手术。
最初随机分组的 314 名女性中有 217 名(69.1%)返回了问卷。未回复者被假定为治疗失败,用于数据分析。两组的主要结局满意度相似(MEA 组为 58%,TBall 组为 53%,差异为 5%;95%置信区间-6 至 16%)。两种技术的闭经率均较高(MEA 组为 51%,TBall 组为 45%,差异为 6%;95%置信区间-5 至 17%)。两种术式的子宫切除术率无显著差异(MEA 组为 9%,TBall 组为 7%,差异为 2%;95%置信区间-5 至 9%)。
治疗后 5 年,MEA 和 Thermachoice 3 热球消融术在患者满意度、月经状况、生活质量评分或子宫切除术率方面无显著临床差异。