Kenworthy Nora J
a Nursing and Health Studies Program , University of Washington , Bothell , WA , USA.
Glob Public Health. 2014;9(1-2):25-42. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2013.879728. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
Participation, decentralisation and community partnership have served as prominent motifs and driving philosophies in the global scale-up of HIV programming. Given the fraught histories of these ideas in development studies, it is surprising to encounter their broad appeal as benchmarks and moral practices in global health work. This paper examines three intertwined, government-endorsed projects to deepen democratic processes of HIV policy-making in Lesotho: (1) the 'Gateway Approach' for decentralising and coordinating local HIV responses; (2) the implementation of a community council-driven priority-setting process; and (3) the establishment of community AIDS councils. Taken together, these efforts are striking and well intentioned, but nonetheless struggle in the face of powerful global agendas to establish meaningful practices of participation and decentralisation. Examining these efforts shows that HIV scale-up conveys formidable lessons for citizens about the politics of global health and their place in the world. As global health initiatives continue to remake important dimensions of political functioning, practitioners, agencies and governments implementing similar democratising projects may find the warnings of earlier development critics both useful and necessary.
参与、权力下放和社区伙伴关系一直是全球扩大艾滋病防治规划中的突出主题和驱动理念。鉴于这些理念在发展研究中有着复杂的历史,令人惊讶的是,它们在全球卫生工作中作为基准和道德实践具有广泛的吸引力。本文考察了莱索托政府支持的三个相互交织的项目,这些项目旨在深化艾滋病政策制定的民主进程:(1)“门户方法”,用于权力下放和协调地方艾滋病应对措施;(2)实施由社区委员会推动的确定优先事项的过程;(3)建立社区艾滋病委员会。总体而言,这些努力引人注目且意图良好,但面对强大的全球议程,在建立有意义的参与和权力下放实践方面仍面临困难。审视这些努力表明,扩大艾滋病防治规模给公民带来了有关全球卫生政治及其在世界上地位的深刻教训。随着全球卫生倡议继续重塑政治运作的重要方面,实施类似民主化项目的从业者、机构和政府可能会发现早期发展批评者的警告既有用又必要。