• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有成本效益:急诊科护理与区域医院信息系统的协调

Cost-effective: emergency department care coordination with a regional hospital information system.

作者信息

Murphy Sean M, Neven Darin

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.

Consistent Care Program, Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's Hospital, Spokane, Washington.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.11.073. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.11.073
PMID:24508115
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frequent and unnecessary utilization of the emergency department (ED) is often a sign of serious latent patient issues, and the associated costs are shared by many. Helping these patients get the care they need in the appropriate setting is difficult given their complexity, and their tendency to visit multiple EDs.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary ED-care-coordination program with a regional hospital information system capable of sharing patients' individualized care plans with cooperating EDs.

METHODS

ED visits, treatment costs, cost per visit, and net income were assessed pre- and postenrollment in the program using nonparametric bootstrapping techniques. Individuals were categorized as frequent (3-11 ED visits in the 365 days preceding enrollment) or extreme (≥12 ED visits) users. Regression to the mean was tested using an adjusted measure of change.

RESULTS

Both frequent and extreme users experienced significant decreases in ED visits (5 and 15, respectively; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 2-5 and 13-17, respectively) and direct-treatment costs ($1285; 95% CI $492-$2364 and $6091; 95% CI $4298-$8998, respectively), leading to significant hospital cost savings and increased net income ($431; 95% CI $112-$878 and $1925; 95% CI $1093-$3159, respectively). The results further indicate that fewer resources were utilized per visit. Regression to the mean did not seem to be an issue.

CONCLUSIONS

When examined as a whole, research on the program suggests that expanding it would be an efficient allocation of hospital, and possibly societal, resources.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)的频繁且不必要的使用往往是患者潜在严重问题的一个迹象,并且相关成本由许多人共同承担。鉴于这些患者情况复杂且倾向于前往多个急诊科就诊,要帮助他们在合适的环境中获得所需的护理是困难的。

研究目的

我们分析了一个多学科急诊科护理协调项目的成本效益,该项目配备了一个能够与合作的急诊科共享患者个性化护理计划的区域医院信息系统。

方法

使用非参数自助法技术评估项目入组前后的急诊科就诊次数、治疗成本、每次就诊成本和净收入。个体被分类为频繁使用者(入组前365天内有3 - 11次急诊科就诊)或极端使用者(≥12次急诊科就诊)。使用调整后的变化量度来检验均值回归。

结果

频繁使用者和极端使用者的急诊科就诊次数均显著减少(分别减少5次和15次;95%置信区间分别为2 - 5次和13 - 17次),直接治疗成本也显著降低(分别为1285美元;95%置信区间为492 - 2364美元和6091美元;95%置信区间为4298 - 8998美元),从而显著节省了医院成本并增加了净收入(分别为431美元;95%置信区间为112 - 878美元和1925美元;95%置信区间为1093 - 3159美元)。结果还表明每次就诊所使用的资源减少。均值回归似乎不是一个问题。

结论

总体来看,对该项目的研究表明扩大该项目将是医院乃至社会资源的有效配置。

相似文献

1
Cost-effective: emergency department care coordination with a regional hospital information system.具有成本效益:急诊科护理与区域医院信息系统的协调
J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.11.073. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
2
Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: implications for health policy.频繁使用者的成本、住院时间及急诊科服务利用情况分析:对卫生政策的启示
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1311-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.008.
3
Cost and utilization analysis of a pediatric emergency department diversion project.儿科急诊科分流项目的成本与利用情况分析
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2093.
4
Rising annual costs of dizziness presentations to U.S. emergency departments.美国急诊部门因头晕就诊导致年度费用不断上升。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):689-96. doi: 10.1111/acem.12168.
5
Unmet substance abuse treatment need, health services utilization, and cost: a population-based emergency department study.未满足的药物滥用治疗需求、医疗服务利用情况及成本:一项基于人群的急诊科研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;45(2):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.003.
6
Pediatric emergency department overcrowding: electronic medical record for identification of frequent, lower acuity visitors. Can we effectively identify patients for enhanced resource utilization?儿科急诊科过度拥挤:利用电子病历识别频繁就诊的低急症患者。我们能否有效识别患者以提高资源利用效率?
J Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;36(3):311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.090. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
7
Epidemiology and characteristics of emergency departments visits by US adults with psychiatric disorder and antipsychotic mention from 2000 to 2004.2000年至2004年美国患有精神疾病并提及使用抗精神病药物的成年人急诊科就诊情况的流行病学及特征
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun;23(6):1375-85. doi: 10.1185/030079907X187900.
8
Anticoagulation monitoring by an anticoagulation service is more cost-effective than routine physician care.抗凝监测服务比常规医生护理更具成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1404-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.021. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
9
Resource utilization and health care charges associated with the most frequent ED users.与最频繁的急诊室使用者相关的资源利用和医疗费用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
Effects of an emergency medical services-based resource access program on frequent users of health services.基于紧急医疗服务的资源获取项目对卫生服务频繁使用者的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):541-7. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.689927. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department.针对频繁到急诊科就诊的患者的干预措施的映射回顾。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00970-7.
2
Strategies for utilisation management of hospital services: a systematic review of interventions.医院服务利用管理策略:干预措施的系统评价。
Global Health. 2022 May 23;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00835-3.
3
Differences between frequent emergency department users in a secondary rural hospital and a tertiary suburban hospital in central Japan: a prevalence study.
日本中部一家二级乡村医院和一家三级郊区医院急诊科频繁使用者之间的差异:一项患病率研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 7;10(9):e039030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039030.
4
Optimizing telehealth pain care after COVID-19.优化新冠疫情后的远程医疗疼痛护理。
Pain. 2020 Nov;161(11):2437-2445. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002048.
5
Costs and effects of interventions targeting frequent presenters to the emergency department: a systematic and narrative review.针对频繁到急诊科就诊的患者的干预措施的成本和效果:系统评价和叙述性综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0296-4.
6
Health care costs of case management for frequent users of the emergency department: Hospital and insurance perspectives.急诊科频繁就诊患者的病例管理的医疗成本:医院和保险视角。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 24;13(9):e0199691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199691. eCollection 2018.
7
Real-Time Emergency Department Electronic Notifications Regarding High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review.关于高危患者的急诊科实时电子通知:一项系统综述
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jul;25(7):604-618. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0117. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
8
The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review.健康信息交换的益处:更新的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1259-1265. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy035.
9
Chronic Pain in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Interdisciplinary Program Demonstrates Improvements in Disability, Psychosocial Function, and Healthcare Utilization.急诊科的慢性疼痛:一项试点跨学科项目显示在残疾、心理社会功能和医疗保健利用方面有所改善。
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Jan 17;2018:1875967. doi: 10.1155/2018/1875967. eCollection 2018.
10
Case Management Reduces Length of Stay, Charges, and Testing in Emergency Department Frequent Users.病例管理可减少急诊科频繁就诊患者的住院时间、费用和检查。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):238-244. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.9.34710. Epub 2018 Feb 12.