De Lichtenberg Trine Honnens, Hermann Gregers G, Rørth Mikael, Højer Larsen Mari-Janne, Mansourvar Zahra, Holm Mette L, Scheike Thomas
Department of Urology , Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen , Denmark.
Scand J Urol. 2014 Aug;48(4):379-86. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.876550. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) after treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) following the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors.
One-hundred and forty-three consecutive mRCC patients were given immunotherapy (n = 59), TKIs (n = 49) or sequential therapy (IMM → TKI group; n = 35). The TKI group included patients with higher age (p < 0.001), worse performance status (p = 0.005) and higher risk profile (p < 0.001) than the other two treatment groups. Number of metastases and sites and tumour histology did not differ between groups.
First line immunotherapy gave a median OS of 16.3 months and first line TKIs 10.9 months (p = 0.003). Survival longer than 5 years was limited to immunotherapy. Sarcomatoid component, metastatic sites, papillary histology, stage, performance status and white cell blood count were related to poor OS. Using multivariate analyses to adjust for risk predictors the difference in OS disappeared. Median OS before and after introduction of TKIs was 16 months and 14 months, respectively (p = 0.189). Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk groups were related to OS (p < 0.001). Heng's prognostic criteria appeared slightly more predictive than MSKCC (p = 0.12). Metastasectomy (n = 42) may improve OS [surgery: median OS 18.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.3-48.5; no surgery: median OS 15 months, 95% CI 10.4-16.5; p = 0.07].
MSKCC and Heng's prognostic algorithms were valid for prognostication and can be used for individual planning of treatment and follow-up. Surgical removal of metastases may improve OS.
本研究旨在评估在引入酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)和雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mTOR)抑制剂后转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的总生存期(OS)。
143例连续的mRCC患者接受了免疫治疗(n = 59)、TKIs治疗(n = 49)或序贯治疗(免疫治疗→TKIs组;n = 35)。与其他两个治疗组相比,TKIs组患者年龄更大(p < 0.001)、体能状态更差(p = 0.005)且风险特征更高(p < 0.001)。各组之间转移灶数量、部位及肿瘤组织学类型无差异。
一线免疫治疗的中位OS为16.3个月,一线TKIs治疗为10.9个月(p = 0.003)。生存期超过5年的情况仅限于免疫治疗。肉瘤样成分、转移部位、乳头状组织学类型、分期、体能状态及白细胞计数与较差的OS相关。采用多因素分析校正风险预测指标后,OS差异消失。引入TKIs前后的中位OS分别为16个月和14个月(p = 0.189)。纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)风险分组与OS相关(p < 0.001)。恒氏预后标准的预测性似乎略高于MSKCC(p = 0.12)。转移灶切除术(n = 42)可能改善OS[手术:中位OS 18.8个月,95%置信区间(CI)12.3 - 48.5;未手术:中位OS 15个月,95%CI 10.4 - 16.5;p = 0.07]。
MSKCC和恒氏预后算法对预后评估有效,可用于个体化治疗规划及随访。手术切除转移灶可能改善OS。