Ziai S, Coriati A, Chabot K, Mailhot M, Richter M V, Rabasa-Lhoret R
Nutrition Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Cystic Fibrosis Clinic, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) & CHUM Research Center (CR-CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Sep;13(5):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
Malnutrition in cystic fibrosis (CF) is associated with increased mortality and can lead to fat-free (FFM) and fat mass (FM) loss. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used and validated to measure FFM and FM. DXA's high cost has led to the utilization of less costly techniques such as bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The aim of this study was to determine the agreement of FFM, FM and %FM measurements taken with DXA and BIA in adults with CF. We measured FFM, FM and %FM in 34 adults with CF with a leg-to-leg BIA and an iDXA and determined agreement using Bland-Altman analysis. While DXA and BIA measurements were well correlated (r > 0.8), mean biases between both methods were between 8 and 11%. BIA underestimated FM and %FM and overestimated FFM. In a clinical research setting where these measurements are used to phenotype patients, BIA cannot replace DXA.
囊性纤维化(CF)患者的营养不良与死亡率增加相关,并且会导致去脂体重(FFM)和脂肪量(FM)减少。双能X线吸收法(DXA)已被用于测量FFM和FM并得到验证。DXA成本高昂,促使人们采用成本较低的技术,如生物电阻抗分析(BIA)。本研究的目的是确定在成年CF患者中,使用DXA和BIA测量FFM、FM和FM百分比的一致性。我们使用腿部对腿部BIA和iDXA测量了34名成年CF患者的FFM、FM和FM百分比,并采用Bland-Altman分析确定一致性。虽然DXA和BIA测量结果相关性良好(r>0.8),但两种方法之间的平均偏差在8%至11%之间。BIA低估了FM和FM百分比,高估了FFM。在这些测量用于对患者进行表型分析的临床研究环境中,BIA无法取代DXA。