Suppr超能文献

束支传导阻滞合并“不明原因”晕厥患者的评估:一项基于全面电生理检查和阿义马林激发试验的研究

Evaluation of patients with bundle branch block and "unexplained" syncope: a study based on comprehensive electrophysiologic testing and ajmaline stress.

作者信息

Kaul U, Dev V, Narula J, Malhotra A K, Talwar K K, Bhatia M L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Mar;11(3):289-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05006.x.

Abstract

Thirty-five patients with bundle branch block (BBB) and unexplained syncope underwent electrophysiologic study (EPS) including programmed ventricular stimulation and ajmaline administration (1 mg/kg, IV) to induce infra-His block. A prolonged HV interval (greater than 55 ms) was present in 16 of the 35 patients. Ajmaline-induced HV block occurred in 12 patients (complete HV block in 10, and 2:1 HV block in two). Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was inducible in nine (25.7%) and polymorphic VT in two patients (5.7%). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was less than 40% in five patients (45.5%) with inducible VT. Two patients had an unexpected co-existence of inducible HV block and VT. The remaining 14 patients (40%) had no detectable abnormality. The incidence of inducible VT was higher (45% vs 13.3%), and the presence of negative studies was lower (30% vs 53.3%) in patients with structural heart disease (n = 20), when compared to those with no significant heart disease (n = 15) (differences not significant [NS]). During a mean follow-up period of 16.5 +/- 9.2 months, all the patients with inducible HV block have been asymptomatic after having received permanent pacemakers. Patients with inducible monomorphic VT (except one with poor left ventricular function who died suddenly) have also been asymptomatic on antiarrhythmic drugs. Of the remaining patients, seven with normal EPS, two with prolonged HV intervals but no inducible HV block (despite being given permanent pacemakers) and one patient with polymorphic VT on antiarrhythmic drugs continue to have recurrent syncope. Approximately 60% of patients with BBB and unexplained syncope have clinically significant electrophysiologic abnormalities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

35例患有束支传导阻滞(BBB)且原因不明的晕厥患者接受了电生理检查(EPS),包括程控心室刺激和静脉注射阿义马林(1mg/kg)以诱发希氏束下阻滞。35例患者中有16例存在HV间期延长(大于55毫秒)。12例患者出现阿义马林诱发的HV阻滞(10例为完全性HV阻滞,2例为2:1 HV阻滞)。9例患者(25.7%)可诱发出单形性室性心动过速(VT),2例患者(5.7%)可诱发出多形性VT。5例(45.5%)可诱发出VT的患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)小于40%。2例患者意外地同时存在可诱发性HV阻滞和VT。其余14例患者(40%)未检测到异常。与无明显心脏病的患者(n = 15)相比,结构性心脏病患者(n = 20)中可诱发性VT的发生率更高(45%对13.3%),阴性检查结果的比例更低(30%对53.3%)(差异无统计学意义[NS])。在平均16.5±9.2个月的随访期内,所有可诱发性HV阻滞的患者在植入永久性起搏器后均无症状。可诱发出单形性VT的患者(除1例左心室功能差且猝死的患者外)在服用抗心律失常药物后也无症状。其余患者中,7例EPS正常,2例HV间期延长但无诱发性HV阻滞(尽管植入了永久性起搏器),1例服用抗心律失常药物的多形性VT患者仍有反复晕厥。约60%的BBB且原因不明的晕厥患者存在具有临床意义的电生理异常。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验