• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

束支传导阻滞合并“不明原因”晕厥患者的评估:一项基于全面电生理检查和阿义马林激发试验的研究

Evaluation of patients with bundle branch block and "unexplained" syncope: a study based on comprehensive electrophysiologic testing and ajmaline stress.

作者信息

Kaul U, Dev V, Narula J, Malhotra A K, Talwar K K, Bhatia M L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Mar;11(3):289-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05006.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05006.x
PMID:2452415
Abstract

Thirty-five patients with bundle branch block (BBB) and unexplained syncope underwent electrophysiologic study (EPS) including programmed ventricular stimulation and ajmaline administration (1 mg/kg, IV) to induce infra-His block. A prolonged HV interval (greater than 55 ms) was present in 16 of the 35 patients. Ajmaline-induced HV block occurred in 12 patients (complete HV block in 10, and 2:1 HV block in two). Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was inducible in nine (25.7%) and polymorphic VT in two patients (5.7%). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was less than 40% in five patients (45.5%) with inducible VT. Two patients had an unexpected co-existence of inducible HV block and VT. The remaining 14 patients (40%) had no detectable abnormality. The incidence of inducible VT was higher (45% vs 13.3%), and the presence of negative studies was lower (30% vs 53.3%) in patients with structural heart disease (n = 20), when compared to those with no significant heart disease (n = 15) (differences not significant [NS]). During a mean follow-up period of 16.5 +/- 9.2 months, all the patients with inducible HV block have been asymptomatic after having received permanent pacemakers. Patients with inducible monomorphic VT (except one with poor left ventricular function who died suddenly) have also been asymptomatic on antiarrhythmic drugs. Of the remaining patients, seven with normal EPS, two with prolonged HV intervals but no inducible HV block (despite being given permanent pacemakers) and one patient with polymorphic VT on antiarrhythmic drugs continue to have recurrent syncope. Approximately 60% of patients with BBB and unexplained syncope have clinically significant electrophysiologic abnormalities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

35例患有束支传导阻滞(BBB)且原因不明的晕厥患者接受了电生理检查(EPS),包括程控心室刺激和静脉注射阿义马林(1mg/kg)以诱发希氏束下阻滞。35例患者中有16例存在HV间期延长(大于55毫秒)。12例患者出现阿义马林诱发的HV阻滞(10例为完全性HV阻滞,2例为2:1 HV阻滞)。9例患者(25.7%)可诱发出单形性室性心动过速(VT),2例患者(5.7%)可诱发出多形性VT。5例(45.5%)可诱发出VT的患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)小于40%。2例患者意外地同时存在可诱发性HV阻滞和VT。其余14例患者(40%)未检测到异常。与无明显心脏病的患者(n = 15)相比,结构性心脏病患者(n = 20)中可诱发性VT的发生率更高(45%对13.3%),阴性检查结果的比例更低(30%对53.3%)(差异无统计学意义[NS])。在平均16.5±9.2个月的随访期内,所有可诱发性HV阻滞的患者在植入永久性起搏器后均无症状。可诱发出单形性VT的患者(除1例左心室功能差且猝死的患者外)在服用抗心律失常药物后也无症状。其余患者中,7例EPS正常,2例HV间期延长但无诱发性HV阻滞(尽管植入了永久性起搏器),1例服用抗心律失常药物的多形性VT患者仍有反复晕厥。约60%的BBB且原因不明的晕厥患者存在具有临床意义的电生理异常。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Evaluation of patients with bundle branch block and "unexplained" syncope: a study based on comprehensive electrophysiologic testing and ajmaline stress.束支传导阻滞合并“不明原因”晕厥患者的评估:一项基于全面电生理检查和阿义马林激发试验的研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Mar;11(3):289-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05006.x.
2
Electrophysiologic testing in bundle branch block and unexplained syncope.束支传导阻滞与不明原因晕厥的电生理检查
Am J Cardiol. 1984 Sep 1;54(6):587-91. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90254-6.
3
Electrophysiologic evaluation of syncope in patients with bifascicular block.双分支阻滞患者晕厥的电生理评估
Am Heart J. 1983 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):693-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(83)90089-3.
4
Clinical implications of electrophysiology study findings in patients with chronic bifascicular block and syncope.慢性双分支阻滞合并晕厥患者电生理研究结果的临床意义
Aust N Z J Med. 1988 Dec;18(7):841-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1988.tb01641.x.
5
Electrophysiologic testing in the evaluation of patients with syncope of undetermined origin.电生理检查在不明原因晕厥患者评估中的应用
Am J Cardiol. 1982 Dec;50(6):1309-15. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90468-4.
6
[Progression to 2d and 3d grade atrioventricular block in patients after electrostimulation for bundle-branch block and syncope: a long-term study].[束支传导阻滞和晕厥患者电刺激后进展为二度和三度房室传导阻滞:一项长期研究]
G Ital Cardiol. 1994 Apr;24(4):409-16.
7
Ajmaline Challenge To Unmask Infrahisian Disease In Patients With Recurrent And Unexplained Syncope, Preserved Ejection Fraction, With Or Without Conduction Abnormalities On Surface ECG.阿义马林激发试验用于揭示复发性不明原因晕厥、射血分数保留且体表心电图有或无传导异常患者的希氏束下疾病
J Atr Fibrillation. 2016 Aug 31;9(2):1421. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1421. eCollection 2016 Aug-Sep.
8
Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction.无创和有创检查对患有束支传导阻滞、晕厥及心肌梗死病史患者的价值。
Europace. 2001 Jul;3(3):187-94. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2001.0174.
9
The value of intracardiac electrophysiologic techniques in recurrent syncope of "unknown cause".
Int J Cardiol. 1986 Jan;10(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(86)90162-2.
10
Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block.有症状束支传导阻滞患者中侵入性电生理检查的作用
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Apr 1;59(8):817-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Advantages and disadvantages of drug challenge during electrophysiological study in patients with new left bundle branch block after transaortic valve implantation.经主动脉瓣植入术后新发左束支传导阻滞患者电生理检查期间药物激发试验的利弊
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Jan 28;39:100961. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100961. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Predictors of positive electrophysiological study in patients with syncope and bundle branch block: PR interval and type of conduction disturbance.晕厥合并束支传导阻滞患者电生理检查阳性的预测因素:PR间期及传导障碍类型。
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1537-1542. doi: 10.1002/clc.23079. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
3
Ajmaline Challenge To Unmask Infrahisian Disease In Patients With Recurrent And Unexplained Syncope, Preserved Ejection Fraction, With Or Without Conduction Abnormalities On Surface ECG.
阿义马林激发试验用于揭示复发性不明原因晕厥、射血分数保留且体表心电图有或无传导异常患者的希氏束下疾病
J Atr Fibrillation. 2016 Aug 31;9(2):1421. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1421. eCollection 2016 Aug-Sep.
4
Correlation of noninvasive electrocardiography with invasive electrophysiology in syncope of unknown origin: implications from a large syncope database.不明原因晕厥中非侵入性心电图与侵入性电生理学的相关性:来自大型晕厥数据库的启示
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2009 Apr;14(2):119-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00286.x.
5
[Guideline invasive electrophysiological diagnostics].[侵入性电生理诊断指南]
Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Sep;96(9):634-51. doi: 10.1007/s00392-007-0572-2.
6
Disopyramide stress test: a sensitive and specific tool for predicting impending high degree atrioventricular block in patients with bifascicular block.丙吡胺负荷试验:预测双分支阻滞患者即将发生高度房室传导阻滞的一种敏感且特异的工具。
Br Heart J. 1995 Dec;74(6):650-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.6.650.