• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Transradial versus transfemoral method of two-stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions: comparison of immediate and long-term outcomes.

作者信息

Gao Zhan, Xu Bo, Yang Yuejin, Kandzari David E, Sun Zhongwei, Qiao Shubin, Wu Yongjian, Yan Hongbing, Yuan Jinqing, Chen Jue, Zhao Yelin, Gao Runlin

机构信息

Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Apr;27(2):99-107. doi: 10.1111/joic.12095. Epub 2014 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1111/joic.12095
PMID:24528337
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of two-stent implantation for true bifurcation disease through transradial (TR) versus transfemoral (TF) approaches have not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared procedural and long-term outcomes of a two-stent strategy percutaneous revascularization in 805 consecutive patients with true bifurcation lesions requiring two-stent implantation via either a TR (n = 508) or TF (n = 297) approach from 2004 to 2009. Clinical and angiographic characteristics, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital and long-term clinical events were compared according to vascular access strategy. Using logistic regression to derive a propensity score model, 249 matched patient pairs were compared. The demographic, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were similar between groups, with the exception of less prior percutaneous intervention and left main bifurcation or multivessel disease in the TR group (all P < 0.05). Angiographic success and fluoroscopy time were similar between cohorts. The duration of hospitalization and in-hospital occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium defined bleeding (3.9% vs. 9.1%, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the TR group. During a mean follow-up period of 55 ± 22 months, in a multivariate regression analysis, the TR method was not predictive of major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazards ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-2.14), cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.45-1.93), or stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to TF vascular access, two-stent implantation via TR approach for true bifurcation lesions is associated with similar in-hospital outcomes, shorter hospitalization, reduced bleeding, and comparable long-term clinical safety and efficacy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Transradial versus transfemoral method of two-stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions: comparison of immediate and long-term outcomes.
J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Apr;27(2):99-107. doi: 10.1111/joic.12095. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
2
Transradial versus transfemoral method of percutaneous coronary revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison of procedural and late-term outcomes.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干病变的比较:手术操作及长期预后比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1035-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.003.
3
Comparison of procedural and long-term outcomes between transradial and transfemoral approach in one-stage intervention for triple vessel coronary artery disease.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径在三支血管冠状动脉疾病一期干预中的手术及长期预后比较
J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Apr;27(2):108-16. doi: 10.1111/joic.12101. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
4
Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for the treatment of left main coronary bifurcations: results from the COBIS (COronary BIfurcation Stenting) II Registry.经桡动脉与经股动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉分叉病变:COBIS(冠状动脉分叉支架置入术)II 注册研究结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Jan;27(1):35-40.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes of the one-stent technique versus the two-stent technique for non-left main true coronary bifurcation disease in the era of drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架时代非左主干真性冠状动脉分叉病变中单支架技术与双支架技术的长期临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Jun;26(3):245-53. doi: 10.1111/joic.12025. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
7
Dedicated two-stent technique in complex bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention with use of everolimus-eluting stents: the EES-bifurcation study.专用双支架技术在复杂分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中应用依维莫司洗脱支架的研究:EES 分叉研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 1;174(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.029. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
8
Trends and Outcomes of Radial Approach in Left-Main Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era: A Two-Center Registry.药物洗脱支架时代左主干分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉入路的趋势与结果:一项双中心注册研究
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Jul;27(7):E125-36.
9
Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with unprotected left main bifurcation lesions treated with 2-stent techniques.无保护左主干分叉病变患者应用双支架技术的长期临床结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Jul;126(13):2409-13.
10
Clinical outcome after crush versus culotte stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic Stent Technique Study 36-month follow-up results.经皮冠状动脉分叉病变挤压与 Culotte 支架置入术的临床结果:北欧支架技术研究 36 个月随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex Large-Bore Radial percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale of the COLOR trial study protocol.复杂大腔径经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:COLOR 试验研究方案的原理。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e038042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038042.