National Centre for Forensic Studies, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Mar;236:30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.028. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
It is generally accepted that the amino acid reagent consisting of 1,2-indanedione and a catalytic amount of zinc chloride, referred to as IND-Zn, is the single best method for the detection of latent fingermarks on paper substrates and that ninhydrin is of limited value when used in sequence after this reagent. However, recent research has suggested that the sequence 1,8-diazafluoren-9-one (DFO) followed by ninhydrin may actually produce a greater number of fingermarks than IND-Zn on its own or IND-Zn followed by ninhydrin. This study focussed on the evaluation of two fingermark detection sequences for porous surfaces: (1) IND-Zn followed by ninhydrin, physical developer (PD) and the lipid stain nile red; and (2) DFO followed by ninhydrin, PD and nile red. The evaluation was undertaken using a range of latent fingermark donors and on a number of paper substrates that are commonly encountered in Australia. In addition, a pseudo-operational trial was completed on 5-year-old university examination booklets. Parallel studies were undertaken at two locations: Sydney (temperate, coastal climate) and Canberra (relatively dry, continental climate). The results of the donor study indicated that there was a negligible difference in performance between the two sequences across all paper types and all time periods evaluated. When considering individual reagents, IND-Zn generally developed better quality fingermarks compared to DFO; however, ninhydrin had a greater enhancement effect on DFO developed marks than after IND-Zn. In the pseudo-operational trials, the IND-Zn sequence outperformed the DFO sequence. Nile red did not develop any additional marks at the end of each sequence and, as a result, the use of this technique at the end of a full sequence is of questionable value. The overall outcome was that the sequence IND-Zn followed by ninhydrin and PD is recommended for the processing of common paper substrates under the conditions typically experienced at the two locations studied.
人们普遍认为,由 1,2-茚二酮和催化量的氯化锌组成的氨基酸试剂,称为 IND-Zn,是检测纸张基质上潜在指纹的最佳方法,而茚三酮在该试剂之后使用时则价值有限。然而,最近的研究表明,1,8-二氮杂芴-9-酮(DFO)继之以茚三酮实际上可能比单独使用 IND-Zn 或 IND-Zn 继之以茚三酮产生更多的指纹。本研究集中于评估两种用于多孔表面的指纹检测序列:(1)IND-Zn 继之以茚三酮、物理显影剂(PD)和脂质染色尼罗红;(2)DFO 继之以茚三酮、PD 和尼罗红。评估使用了一系列潜在指纹供体,并在澳大利亚常见的多种纸张基质上进行。此外,还在五年制大学考试簿上完成了一项模拟操作试验。在两个地点进行了平行研究:悉尼(温带、沿海气候)和堪培拉(相对干燥、大陆性气候)。供体研究的结果表明,在所有评估的纸张类型和时间段内,两种序列之间的性能几乎没有差异。考虑到个别试剂,IND-Zn 通常比 DFO 开发出质量更好的指纹;然而,与 IND-Zn 相比,茚三酮对 DFO 开发的标记具有更大的增强效果。在模拟操作试验中,IND-Zn 序列的表现优于 DFO 序列。尼罗红在每个序列的末尾都没有开发出任何其他标记,因此,在完整序列的末尾使用该技术的价值值得怀疑。总体结果是,推荐在两个研究地点通常经历的条件下,使用 IND-Zn 继之以茚三酮和 PD 的序列来处理常见的纸张基质。