Div. of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Dept. of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Vienna, Austria.
Edwin L. Steele Laboratory of Tumor Biology, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Hepatol. 2014 Jun;60(6):1135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Development of the portal-hypertensive syndrome is mediated by splanchnic inflammation and neoangiogenesis. Since peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists like pioglitazone (PIO) regulate inflammatory response and inhibit angiogenesis in endothelial cells, we evaluated PIO as treatment for experimental portal hypertension.
PIO (10 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH) was administered from day 21-28 after bile duct ligation (BDL), from day 0-7 after partial portal vein ligation (PPVL) or sham-operation (SO), respectively. After treatment, systemic hemodynamics, splanchnic blood flow (SMABF), portal pressure (PP), and portosystemic shunting (PSS) were assessed. Splanchnic and hepatic tissues were analyzed for angiogenic and inflammatory markers.
BDL and PPVL showed significantly increased PP, SMABF, and PSS compared to SO-VEH rats. While PIO treatment did not decrease PP or SMABF, PSS was significantly reduced both in cirrhotic (BDL-VEH: 71% to BDL-PIO: 41%; p<0.001) and non-cirrhotic (PPVL-VEH: 62% to PPVL-PIO: 40%; p=0.041) rats. PIO (10 μM, in vitro) inhibited endothelial cell migration and significantly increased PPARγ activity in vivo. In BDL rats, PIO decreased hepatic mRNA levels of PPARγ (p=0.01) and PlGF (p=0.071), and splanchnic mRNA expression of PPARγ (p=0.017), PDGFβ (p=0.053) and TNFα (p=0.075). Accordingly, splanchnic protein expression of PPARγ (p=0.032), VEGFR2 (p=0.035), CD31 (p=0.060) and PDGFβ (p=0.066) were lower in BDL-PIO vs. BDL-VEH animals. In PPVL rats, PIO treatment decreased splanchnic gene expression of Ang2 (-12.4 fold), eNOS (-9.3 fold), PDGF (-7.0 fold), PlGF (-11.9 fold), TGFb (-8.3 fold), VEGF-A (-11.3 fold), VEGFR1 (-5.9 fold), IL1b (-14.4 fold), and IL6 (-9.6 fold).
Pioglitazone treatment decreases portosystemic shunting via modulation of splanchnic inflammation and neoangiogenesis. Pioglitazone should be assessed for potential beneficial effects in patients with portosystemic collaterals due to portal hypertension.
门脉高压综合征的发展是由内脏炎症和新生血管引起的。由于过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARγ)激动剂如吡格列酮(PIO)可调节内皮细胞的炎症反应并抑制血管生成,我们评估了 PIO 作为治疗实验性门脉高压的药物。
分别在胆管结扎(BDL)后第 21-28 天(BDL-PIO)和部分门静脉结扎(PPVL)或假手术(SO)后第 0-7 天(PPVL-PIO)给予 PIO(10mg/kg)或载体(VEH)治疗。治疗后,评估全身血流动力学、内脏血流量(SMABF)、门脉压(PP)和门体分流(PSS)。分析内脏和肝脏组织中的血管生成和炎症标志物。
BDL 和 PPVL 与 SO-VEH 大鼠相比,PP、SMABF 和 PSS 明显增加。虽然 PIO 治疗不能降低 PP 或 SMABF,但在肝硬化(BDL-VEH:71%至 BDL-PIO:41%;p<0.001)和非肝硬化(PPVL-VEH:62%至 PPVL-PIO:40%;p=0.041)大鼠中,PSS 显著降低。PIO(10μM,体外)抑制内皮细胞迁移,并显著增加体内的 PPARγ 活性。在 BDL 大鼠中,PIO 降低了肝组织中 PPARγ(p=0.01)和 PlGF(p=0.071)的 mRNA 水平,以及内脏组织中 PPARγ(p=0.017)、PDGFβ(p=0.053)和 TNFα(p=0.075)的 mRNA 表达。相应地,BDL-PIO 大鼠的内脏组织中 PPARγ(p=0.032)、VEGFR2(p=0.035)、CD31(p=0.060)和 PDGFβ(p=0.066)的蛋白表达降低。在 PPVL 大鼠中,PIO 治疗降低了内脏组织中 Ang2(-12.4 倍)、eNOS(-9.3 倍)、PDGF(-7.0 倍)、PlGF(-11.9 倍)、TGFb(-8.3 倍)、VEGF-A(-11.3 倍)、VEGFR1(-5.9 倍)、IL1b(-14.4 倍)和 IL6(-9.6 倍)的基因表达。
吡格列酮治疗通过调节内脏炎症和新生血管来降低门体分流。由于门脉高压导致的门体侧支循环,吡格列酮应该在患者中评估其潜在的有益作用。