• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中度无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的疾病进展风险:吸烟及双联抗血小板治疗的影响

Risk of disease progression in patients with moderate asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: implications of tobacco use and dual antiplatelet therapy.

作者信息

Hicks Caitlin W, Talbott Katherine, Canner Joseph K, Qazi Umair, Arhuidese Isibor, Glebova Natalia O, Freischlag Julie A, Perler Bruce A, Malas Mahmoud B

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2014.02.007
PMID:24530720
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of improved medical therapy in contemporary practice, some have advocated that, most if not, all patients with asymptomatic carotid disease should be managed medically without intervention. Disease progression in this patient population is not well established, and data describing risk factors for disease progression in patients with moderate asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ASCAS) are lacking. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for disease progression in this patient population.

METHODS

All patients presenting to a tertiary center between January 2005 and May 2012 with moderate (50-69%) ASCAS as determined by carotid artery duplex were included. Outcomes including disease progression to severe stenosis (≥70%), incidence of symptoms, need for operative intervention, and all-cause mortality were recorded. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify risk factors for disease progression.

RESULTS

A total of 282 carotid arteries in 258 patients with moderate ASCAS were identified from 1555 carotid duplex scans over the 7.5-year study period (mean age: 70.6 ± 0.55 years, 52% male). Mean follow-up time was 2.6 ± 0.10 years. Overall, disease progression to severe stenosis occurred in 25.2% (n = 71) and followed a linear trend. The incidence of symptoms including ipsilateral stroke (2.13%, n = 6) and transient ischemic attack (0.71%; n = 2) was low. Carotid endarterectomy was performed in 15.3% (n = 43) of patients, all with severe disease. Carotid stenting was performed in 3.90% (n = 11) patients. Risk of progression was higher in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-3.15; P = 0.02) and smokers (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.96-3.55; P = 0.05). Age, gender (women), hypertension, statin use, and aspirin use were not significant predictors of progression to severe stenosis. There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality in patients who progressed compared with those who did not (HR 3.39, 95% CI 0.91-12.6; P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, one-quarter of patients with moderate ASCAS progressed to severe disease, although the majority remained asymptomatic. Smoking and dual antiplatelet therapy are independent risk factors for disease progression. Patients with identifiable risk factors may warrant more careful follow-up.

摘要

背景

由于现代医学治疗方法的改进,一些人主张,大多数(即便不是全部)无症状颈动脉疾病患者应接受药物治疗而非干预措施。该患者群体中的疾病进展情况尚未明确,且缺乏描述中度无症状颈动脉狭窄(ASCAS)患者疾病进展风险因素的数据。我们研究的目的是确定该患者群体中疾病进展的发生率及风险因素。

方法

纳入2005年1月至2012年5月期间在一家三级中心就诊、经颈动脉双功超声检查确定为中度(50%-69%)ASCAS的所有患者。记录包括疾病进展至重度狭窄(≥70%)、症状发生率、手术干预需求及全因死亡率等结果。采用Cox比例风险回归模型确定疾病进展的风险因素。

结果

在7.5年的研究期间,从1555次颈动脉双功超声扫描中识别出258例中度ASCAS患者的282条颈动脉(平均年龄:70.6±0.55岁,52%为男性)。平均随访时间为2.6±0.10年。总体而言,25.2%(n=71)的患者疾病进展至重度狭窄,且呈线性趋势。包括同侧卒中(2.13%,n=6)和短暂性脑缺血发作(0.71%;n=2)在内的症状发生率较低。15.3%(n=43)的患者接受了颈动脉内膜切除术,均为重度疾病患者。3.90%(n=11)的患者接受了颈动脉支架置入术。接受双联抗血小板治疗的患者(风险比[HR]1.85,95%置信区间[CI]1.09-3.15;P=0.02)和吸烟者(HR 1.85,95%CI 0.96-3.55;P=0.05)疾病进展风险更高。年龄、性别(女性)、高血压、他汀类药物使用及阿司匹林使用并非进展至重度狭窄的显著预测因素。与未进展患者相比,进展患者的死亡率有升高趋势,但差异无统计学意义(HR 3.39,95%CI 0.91-12.6;P=0.07)。

结论

在我们的研究中,四分之一的中度ASCAS患者进展为重度疾病,尽管大多数患者仍无症状。吸烟和双联抗血小板治疗是疾病进展的独立风险因素。具有可识别风险因素的患者可能需要更密切的随访。

相似文献

1
Risk of disease progression in patients with moderate asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: implications of tobacco use and dual antiplatelet therapy.中度无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的疾病进展风险:吸烟及双联抗血小板治疗的影响
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
2
Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis despite optimal medical therapy.尽管进行了最佳药物治疗,无症状颈动脉狭窄仍在进展。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):128-35.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.04.002.
3
The natural history of asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis.无症状重度颈动脉狭窄的自然病史。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov;60(5):1218-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.047. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
4
Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel and aspirin) is associated with increased all-cause mortality after carotid revascularization for asymptomatic carotid disease.对于无症状性颈动脉疾病,在进行颈动脉血运重建术后,双重抗血小板治疗(氯吡格雷和阿司匹林)与全因死亡率增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):950-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.087. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
5
Role of statin therapy and angiotensin blockade in patients with asymptomatic moderate carotid artery stenosis.他汀类药物治疗和血管紧张素阻断在无症状性中度颈动脉狭窄患者中的作用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;26(3):344-52. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.10.010. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
6
Natural History of Non-operative Management in Asymptomatic Patients with 70%-80% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis by Duplex Criteria.无症状患者经双功能超声检查诊断为 70%-80% 颈内动脉狭窄的非手术治疗自然史。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Sep;60(3):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
7
Perioperative and long-term impact of chronic kidney disease on carotid artery interventions.慢性肾脏病对颈动脉介入治疗的围手术期及长期影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1295-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.038.
8
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
9
Degree of contralateral carotid stenosis improves preoperative risk stratification of patients with asymptomatic ipsilateral carotid stenosis.对侧颈动脉狭窄程度可改善无症状性同侧颈动脉狭窄患者的术前风险分层。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):82-8.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.067. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
10
Development of a duplex-derived velocity risk prediction model of disease progression in patients with moderate asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.中度无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者疾病进展的双功超声衍生速度风险预测模型的开发。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Dec;60(6):1585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.056. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Asymptomatic Females Are at Higher Risk for Perioperative TIA/Stroke and Males Are at Higher Risk for Long-Term Mortality after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Vascular Quality Initiative Analysis.无症状女性在颈动脉支架置入术后围手术期发生短暂性脑缺血发作/中风的风险更高,而男性在术后长期死亡风险更高:一项血管质量改进计划分析。
Int J Angiol. 2020 Sep 16;33(1):36-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712506. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in subjects with asymptomatic mild carotid artery stenosis.无症状性轻度颈动脉狭窄患者发生主要不良心血管事件的风险。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 16;8(1):4700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23125-8.
3
Risks Associated With Primary and Redo Carotid Endarterectomy in the Endovascular Era.
血管内时代初次颈动脉内膜切除术和再次颈动脉内膜切除术的相关风险。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Mar 1;153(3):252-259. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4477.