Näbauer Michael
Medizinische Klinik I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland,
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2014 Mar;25(1):12-8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-014-0299-5. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common form of persistent arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation frequently causes rapid ventricular response with severe clinical symptoms requiring acute control of the ventricular rate. This leads to hemodynamic stabilization and improvement of symptoms. The long-term treatment target is to minimize patient symptoms and prevention of complications. As a rhythm control strategy does not provide a survival benefit compared to a rate control strategy, decisions on the best long-term treatment have to be individualized. Important factors affecting this decision are age of the patient, chances to re-establish and maintain sinus rhythm, tolerance of antiarrhythmic medication and accompanying diseases of the heart. For younger patients a rhythm control strategy will usually be the preferred option. For rate control beta blockers are considered first line therapy, alternative drugs include calcium antagonists and digoxin. Occasionally, amiodarone may also be used for rate control. If pharmacological rate management fails ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) node may be an option to control the ventricular rate.