Fien Hank, Smith Jean Louise M, Smolkowski Keith, Baker Scott K, Nelson Nancy J, Chaparro Erin
University of Oregon, Eugene, USA
University of Oregon, Eugene, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Nov-Dec;48(6):602-21. doi: 10.1177/0022219414521664. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
This article presents findings of an efficacy trial examining the effect of a multitiered instruction and intervention model on first grade at-risk students' reading outcomes. Schools (N = 16) were randomly assigned to the treatment or control condition. In the fall of Grade 1, students were assigned to an instructional tier on the basis of Stanford Achievement Test-10th Edition scores (31st percentile and above = Tier 1; from the 10th to the 30th percentile = Tier 2). In both conditions, students identified as at risk (i.e., Tier 2; n = 267) received 90 min of whole group instruction (Tier 1) and an additional 30 min of daily small group intervention (Tier 2). In the treatment condition, teachers were trained to enhance core reading instruction by making instruction more explicit and increasing practice opportunities for students in Tier 1. In addition, at-risk readers were provided an additional 30-min daily small group intervention with content that was highly aligned with the Tier 1 core reading program. Results indicate significant, positive effects of the intervention on students' decoding and first semester fluent reading and potentially positive effects on reading comprehension and total reading achievement.
本文介绍了一项效能试验的结果,该试验考察了多层次教学与干预模式对一年级高危学生阅读成绩的影响。学校(N = 16)被随机分配到治疗组或对照组。在一年级秋季,学生根据斯坦福成就测验第10版的分数被分配到一个教学层级(第31百分位及以上 = 第1层级;第10至第30百分位 = 第2层级)。在两种情况下,被确定为高危的学生(即第2层级;n = 267)接受90分钟的全班教学(第1层级)和额外30分钟的每日小组干预(第2层级)。在治疗组中,教师接受培训,通过使教学更加明确并增加第1层级学生的练习机会来加强核心阅读教学。此外,高危阅读者每天还接受额外30分钟的小组干预,其内容与第1层级核心阅读课程高度一致。结果表明,该干预对学生的解码和第一学期流畅阅读有显著的积极影响,对阅读理解和总阅读成绩可能有积极影响。