Wohlfiel Caroline K, Leu Stephan T, Godfrey Stephanie S, Bull C Michael
School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, Australia ; School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2013 Sep 19;2:271-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.09.005. eCollection 2013 Dec.
We investigated transmission pathways for two tick species, Bothriocroton hydrosauri and Amblyomma limbatum, among their sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa) hosts in a natural population in South Australia. Our aim was to determine whether a transmission network model continued to predict parasite load patterns effectively under varying ecological conditions. Using GPS loggers we identified the refuge sites used by each lizard on each day. We estimated infectious time windows for ticks that detached from a lizard in a refuge. Time windows were from the time when a detached tick molted and become infective, until the time it died from desiccation while waiting for a new host. Previous research has shown that A. limbatum molts earlier and survives longer than B. hydrosauri. We developed two transmission network models based on these differences in infective time windows for the two tick species. Directed edges were generated in the network if one lizard used a refuge that had previously been used by another lizard within the infectious time window. We used those models to generate values of network node in-strength for each lizard, a measure of how strongly connected an individual is to other lizards in the transmission network, and a prediction of infection risk for each host. The consistent correlations over time between B. hydrosauri infection intensity and network derived infection risk suggest that network models can be robust to environmental variation among years. However, the contrasting lack of consistent correlation in A. limbatum suggests that the utility of the same network models may depend on the specific biology of a parasite species.
我们在南澳大利亚一个自然种群中,研究了两种蜱虫——糙鳞钝眼蜱(Bothriocroton hydrosauri)和缘斑钝眼蜱(Amblyomma limbatum)在其睡眠蜥蜴(松果蜥,Tiliqua rugosa)宿主之间的传播途径。我们的目的是确定在不同生态条件下,传播网络模型是否仍能有效预测寄生虫负荷模式。我们使用GPS记录仪确定了每只蜥蜴每天使用的避难所位置。我们估计了在避难所中从蜥蜴身上脱落的蜱虫的感染时间窗口。时间窗口是从蜱虫脱落并开始具有感染性的时刻,到它在等待新宿主时因干燥而死亡的时刻。先前的研究表明,缘斑钝眼蜱比糙鳞钝眼蜱更早蜕皮且存活时间更长。基于这两种蜱虫在感染时间窗口上的差异,我们开发了两个传播网络模型。如果一只蜥蜴使用了另一只蜥蜴在感染时间窗口内曾使用过的避难所,就在网络中生成有向边。我们使用这些模型来生成每个蜥蜴的网络节点入度值,这是衡量个体在传播网络中与其他蜥蜴连接强度的指标,也是对每个宿主感染风险的预测。糙鳞钝眼蜱感染强度与网络得出的感染风险之间随时间的一致相关性表明,网络模型对不同年份的环境变化可能具有稳健性。然而,缘斑钝眼蜱缺乏一致相关性的对比情况表明,相同网络模型的效用可能取决于寄生虫物种的特定生物学特性。