• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蛋白质呼吸性过敏原的分类:枯草杆菌蛋白酶为例。

Categorisation of protein respiratory allergens: the case of Subtilisin.

机构信息

Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.

DABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1PR, UK.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;68(3):488-92. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.02.004
PMID:24534002
Abstract

Characterisation of the relative sensitizing potency of protein and chemical allergens remains challenging, particularly for materials causing allergic sensitization of the respiratory tract. There nevertheless remains an appetite, for priority setting and risk management, to develop paradigms that distinguish between individual respiratory allergens according to perceptions of the hazards and risks posed to human health. One manifestation thereof is recent listing of certain respiratory allergens as Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) under the provisions of REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of Chemicals). Although priority setting is a laudable ambition, it is important the process is predicated on evidence-based criteria that are transparent, understood and owned. The danger is that in the absence of rigorous criteria unwanted precedents can be created, and confidence in the process is compromised. A default categorisation of sensitisers as SVHC requiring assessment under the authorisation process is not desirable. We therefore consider here the value and limitations of selective assignment of certain respiratory allergens as being SVHC. The difficulties of sustaining such designations in a sound and equitable way is discussed in the context of the challenges that exist with respect to assessment of potency, and information available regarding the effectiveness of exposure-based risk management.

摘要

对蛋白质和化学过敏原的相对致敏性进行特征描述仍然具有挑战性,特别是对于引起呼吸道过敏的物质。然而,出于优先排序和风险管理的目的,仍然存在一种需求,即根据对人类健康构成的危害和风险的看法,开发区分个体呼吸道过敏原的范式。其中一种表现形式是,根据 REACH(化学品注册、评估、授权和限制)的规定,将某些呼吸道过敏原最近列为高度关注物质 (SVHC)。尽管优先排序是一个值得称赞的目标,但重要的是,该过程基于透明、理解和拥有的基于证据的标准。危险的是,如果没有严格的标准,可能会产生不必要的先例,并且对该过程的信心会受到损害。将敏化剂默认归类为 SVHC,并要求在授权过程中进行评估是不可取的。因此,我们在这里考虑将某些呼吸道过敏原选择性指定为 SVHC 的价值和局限性。在评估效力方面存在挑战的背景下,以及关于基于暴露的风险管理的有效性的信息,讨论了以合理和公平的方式维持此类指定的困难。

相似文献

1
Categorisation of protein respiratory allergens: the case of Subtilisin.蛋白质呼吸性过敏原的分类:枯草杆菌蛋白酶为例。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;68(3):488-92. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
2
Assessing the potency of respiratory allergens: uncertainties and challenges.评估呼吸过敏原的效价:不确定性和挑战。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;61(3):365-72. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
3
Consideration of criteria required for assignment of a (skin) sensitiser a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under the REACH regulation.关于根据《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》(REACH法规)将(皮肤)致敏剂列为高度关注物质(SVHC)所需标准的考量。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;69(3):524-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
4
Trade Union Priority List for REACH authorisation.行业工会优先关注 REACH 授权事宜。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jan;65(1):8-13. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.090811. Epub 2010 May 27.
5
Defining occupational and consumer exposure limits for enzyme protein respiratory allergens under REACH.在 REACH 下定义酶蛋白呼吸过敏原的职业和消费者暴露限值。
Toxicology. 2010 Feb 9;268(3):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.12.014. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
6
Chemical allergy: translating biology into hazard characterization.化学过敏:将生物学转化为危害特征描述。
Toxicol Sci. 2011 Mar;120 Suppl 1:S238-68. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq346. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
7
Decision trees for evaluating skin and respiratory sensitizing potential of chemicals in accordance with European regulations.根据欧洲法规,用于评估化学品皮肤和呼吸道致敏潜力的决策树。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Aug;63(3):371-80. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 11.
8
Chemical reactivity measurements: potential for characterization of respiratory chemical allergens.化学活性测量:用于鉴定呼吸化学过敏原的潜力。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2011 Mar;25(2):433-45. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
9
Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.局部淋巴结试验与人体皮肤致敏试验之间的定量关系。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;39(3):245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.02.002.
10
Semipolar polycyclic aromatic compounds: identification of 15 priority substances and the need for regulatory steps under REACH regulation.半极性多环芳烃化合物:15种优先物质的识别及《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》(REACH法规)下监管措施的必要性
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2014 Jul;10(3):415-28. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1526. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Status of microbial based cleaning products in statutory regulations and ecolabelling in Europe, the USA, and Canada.在欧洲、美国和加拿大,基于微生物的清洁产品在法规和生态标签方面的状况。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Jun;116(Pt A):10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.12.057. Epub 2017 Dec 29.