Suppr超能文献

评估奶牛实验性内脏痛:一项聚焦于脊髓疼痛蛋白质组学的初步、前瞻性、盲法、随机对照研究。

Assessing experimental visceral pain in dairy cattle: A pilot, prospective, blinded, randomized, and controlled study focusing on spinal pain proteomics.

作者信息

Rialland P, Otis C, de Courval M-L, Mulon P-Y, Harvey D, Bichot S, Gauvin D, Livingston A, Beaudry F, Hélie P, Frank D, Del Castillo J R E, Troncy E

机构信息

Quebec Research Group in Animal Pharmacology (GREPAQ), Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire-Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 7C6, Canada.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire-Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 7C6, Canada.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(4):2118-34. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7142. Epub 2014 Feb 15.

Abstract

Few studies have verified the validity of behavioral and physiological methods of pain assessment in cattle. This prospective, blinded, randomized controlled experimental study aimed to validate different methods of pain assessment during acute and chronic (up to 21 d postintervention) conditions in dairy cattle, in response to 3 analgesic treatments for traumatic reticuloperitonitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and mechanical sensitization were measured as indicators of centralized pain. Proteomics in the CSF were examined to detect specific (to pain intensity) and sensitive (responsive to analgesia) markers. Recordings of spontaneous behavior with video analysis, telemetered motor activity, pain scales, electrodermal activity, and plasma cortisol concentration were quantified at regular intervals. Cows were assigned to group 1 (n=4, standard control receiving aspirin), group 2 (n=5, test group receiving preemptive tolfenamic acid), or group 3 (n=3, positive control receiving preemptive multimodal analgesia composed of epidural morphine, plus tolfenamic acid and butorphanol). Rescue analgesia was administered as needed. Generalized estimating equations tested group differences and the influence of rescue analgesia on the measurements. All 3 groups demonstrated a long-term decrease in a CSF protein identified as transthyretin. The decrease in transthyretin expression inversely correlated with the expected level of analgesia (group 1<2<3). Moreover, in group 1, CSF noradrenaline decreased long term, cows were hypersensitive to mechanical stimulation, and they demonstrated signs of discomfort with higher motor activity and "agitation while lying" recorded from video analysis. Decreased "feeding behavior," observer-reported pain scales, electrodermal activity, and plasma cortisol concentration were inconsistent to differentiate pain intensity between groups. In summary, changes in CSF biomarkers and mechanical sensitization reflected modulation of central pain in dairy cows. The spontaneous behavior "agitation while lying" was the only behavioral outcome validated for assessing acute and chronic pain in this visceral pain model.

摘要

很少有研究验证牛疼痛评估的行为和生理方法的有效性。这项前瞻性、盲法、随机对照实验研究旨在验证奶牛在急性和慢性(干预后长达21天)情况下,针对创伤性网胃炎的3种镇痛治疗的不同疼痛评估方法。测量脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物和机械敏化作为中枢性疼痛的指标。检测脑脊液中的蛋白质组学以发现特定的(与疼痛强度相关)和敏感的(对镇痛有反应)标志物。通过视频分析、遥测运动活动、疼痛量表、皮肤电活动和血浆皮质醇浓度定期对自发行为进行记录并量化。奶牛被分为第1组(n = 4,接受阿司匹林的标准对照组)、第2组(n = 5,接受预防性托芬那酸的试验组)或第3组(n = 3,接受由硬膜外吗啡、托芬那酸和布托啡诺组成的预防性多模式镇痛的阳性对照组)。根据需要给予解救镇痛。广义估计方程检验组间差异以及解救镇痛对测量结果的影响。所有3组均显示一种被鉴定为转甲状腺素蛋白的脑脊液蛋白质长期减少。转甲状腺素蛋白表达的减少与预期的镇痛水平呈负相关(第1组<第2组<第3组)。此外,在第1组中,脑脊液去甲肾上腺素长期减少,奶牛对机械刺激过敏,并且视频分析记录显示它们表现出更高运动活动和“躺卧时躁动”的不适迹象。“进食行为”减少、观察者报告的疼痛量表、皮肤电活动和血浆皮质醇浓度在区分组间疼痛强度方面不一致。总之,脑脊液生物标志物和机械敏化的变化反映了奶牛中枢性疼痛的调节。自发行为“躺卧时躁动”是该内脏痛模型中唯一被验证用于评估急性和慢性疼痛的行为结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验