Cross Amanda Brown, Mulvey Edward P, Schubert Carol A, Griffin Patricia A, Filone Sarah, Winckworth-Prejsnar Katy, DeMatteo David, Heilbrun Kirk
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):530-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200566.
The popularity of crisis intervention teams (CITs) for law enforcement agencies has grown dramatically over the past decade. Law enforcement agencies and advocates for individuals with mental illness view the model as a clear improvement in the way the criminal justice system handles individuals with mental illness. There is, however, only limited empirical support for the perceived effectiveness of CITs. This Open Forum analyzes research needs in this area and offers recommendations. Two major gaps in CIT research are identified: verifying that changes in officers' attitudes and skills translate into behavioral change and determining how criminal justice-mental health partnerships affect officers' behavior. Research addressing these gaps could help set benchmarks of success and identify evidence-based practices for CIT, substantially increasing the empirical base of support for CIT.
在过去十年中,危机干预小组(CITs)在执法机构中的受欢迎程度急剧上升。执法机构和精神疾病患者权益倡导者认为,该模式是刑事司法系统处理精神疾病患者方式的明显改进。然而,对于CITs的实际效果,仅有有限的实证支持。本公开论坛分析了该领域的研究需求并提出了建议。确定了CIT研究中的两个主要差距:验证警官态度和技能的变化是否转化为行为改变,以及确定刑事司法与心理健康伙伴关系如何影响警官行为。针对这些差距的研究有助于设定成功基准并确定CIT的循证实践,从而大幅增加对CIT的实证支持基础。