López-Torres Hidalgo Jesús, López Gallardo Yolanda, Párraga Martínez Ignacio, del Campo del Campo José Maria, Villena Ferrer Alejandro, Morena Rayo Susana
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2013 Nov-Dec;87(6):615-25, 627, quiz; 626. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272013000600006.
We have no questionnaires to assess satisfaction with antidepressant treatment, which affects the health related quality of life. The objective was to develop and validate a specific instrument to assess satisfaction with antidepressant treatment, determining convergent validity regarding clinical effectiveness, fulfillment of expectations, adherence and tolerability.
Longitudinal observational study where 168 patients started antidepressant treatment and were followed for one year. The variables included adverse effects, compliance and intensity of depressive symptoms. The questionnaire for the Evaluation of Antidepressant Treatment Satisfaction (ESTA) consists of 11 items answered using Likert scale. We evaluated its reliability, construct validity and concurrent validity with conceptually related measures with the construct assessed.
The Cronbach's alpha statistic ranged between 0.936 and 0.951. In the factor analysis one factor accounted for 64.11% of the variance. The average score of the questionnaire ranged from 40.0 to 44.7 points, showing a negative correlation regarding the Hamilton scale (-0.321 / -0.601) and Montgomery-Asberg scale (-0.491 / -0.307). After a month, the antidepressant treatment satisfaction was 39.5 points in noncompliant patients and 44.3 in compliers. In those who had adverse effects was 39.2 versus 43.3 for those who had not. At the first visit (15 days) the score was 40.0, in a month 42.6, in 3 months 44.4 and in 6 months 44.5. These differences were statistically significant (p <0.05). In test-retest analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.908.
The questionnaire, designed to assess satisfaction with antidepressant treatment, is valid and reliable, and provides a patient-centered instrument which is complementary to the clinical assessment of the effectiveness of antidepressant treatment.
我们没有用于评估对抗抑郁治疗满意度的问卷,而这种满意度会影响与健康相关的生活质量。目的是开发并验证一种专门用于评估对抗抑郁治疗满意度的工具,确定其在临床疗效、期望达成、依从性和耐受性方面的收敛效度。
纵向观察性研究,168例患者开始接受抗抑郁治疗并随访一年。变量包括不良反应、依从性和抑郁症状的强度。抗抑郁治疗满意度评估问卷(ESTA)由11个使用李克特量表回答的项目组成。我们用与所评估结构概念相关的测量方法评估了其信度、结构效度和同时效度。
克朗巴哈系数统计值在0.936至0.951之间。在因子分析中,一个因子解释了64.11%的方差。问卷平均得分在40.0至44.7分之间,与汉密尔顿量表(-0.321 / -0.601)和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格量表(-0.491 / -0.307)呈负相关。一个月后,不依从患者的抗抑郁治疗满意度为39.5分,依从患者为44.3分。有不良反应的患者为39.2分,无不良反应的患者为43.3分。首次就诊(15天)时得分为40.0分,一个月时为42.6分,三个月时为44.4分,六个月时为44.5分。这些差异具有统计学意义(p <0.05)。在重测分析中,组内相关系数为0.908。
该旨在评估对抗抑郁治疗满意度的问卷有效且可靠,提供了一种以患者为中心的工具,可补充抗抑郁治疗效果的临床评估。